Daniel A Baur, Caroline M Lassalle, Stephanie P Kurti
{"title":"Thoracic load carriage impairs the acute physiological response to hypoxia in healthy males.","authors":"Daniel A Baur, Caroline M Lassalle, Stephanie P Kurti","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the impact of thoracic load carriage on the physiological response to exercise in hypoxia. Healthy males (n = 12) completed 3 trials consisting of 45 min walking in the following conditions: (1) unloaded normoxia (UN; F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub>:20.93%); (2) unloaded hypoxia (UH; F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub>:~13.0%); and (3) loaded hypoxia (LH; 29.5 kg; F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub>:~13.0%). Intensity was matched for absolute VO<sub>2</sub> (2.0 ± 0.2 L·min<sup>-1</sup>) across conditions and relative VO<sub>2</sub> (64.0 ± 2.6 %VO<sub>2max</sub>) across hypoxic conditions. With LH versus UH, there were increases in breathing frequency (5-11 breaths·min<sup>-1</sup>; p < 0.05) and decreases in tidal volume (10%-18%; p < 0.05) throughout exercise due to reductions in end inspiratory lung volumes (p < 0.05). Consequently, deadspace (11%-23%; p < 0.05) and minute ventilation (7%-11%; p < 0.05) were increased starting at 20 and 30 min, respectively. In addition, LH increased perceived exertion/dyspnea and induced inspiratory (~12%; p < 0.05 vs. UN) and expiratory (~10%; p < 0.05 vs. pre-exercise) respiratory muscle fatigue. Expiratory flow limitation was present in 50% of subjects during LH. Cardiac output and muscle oxygenation were maintained during LH despite reduced stroke volume (6%-8%; p < 0.05). Finally, cerebral oxygenated/total hemoglobin were elevated in the LH condition versus UH starting at 15 min (p < 0.05). Thoracic load carriage increases physiological strain and interferes with the compensatory response to hypoxic exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 1","pages":"e70197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11710892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To assess the impact of thoracic load carriage on the physiological response to exercise in hypoxia. Healthy males (n = 12) completed 3 trials consisting of 45 min walking in the following conditions: (1) unloaded normoxia (UN; FIO2:20.93%); (2) unloaded hypoxia (UH; FIO2:~13.0%); and (3) loaded hypoxia (LH; 29.5 kg; FIO2:~13.0%). Intensity was matched for absolute VO2 (2.0 ± 0.2 L·min-1) across conditions and relative VO2 (64.0 ± 2.6 %VO2max) across hypoxic conditions. With LH versus UH, there were increases in breathing frequency (5-11 breaths·min-1; p < 0.05) and decreases in tidal volume (10%-18%; p < 0.05) throughout exercise due to reductions in end inspiratory lung volumes (p < 0.05). Consequently, deadspace (11%-23%; p < 0.05) and minute ventilation (7%-11%; p < 0.05) were increased starting at 20 and 30 min, respectively. In addition, LH increased perceived exertion/dyspnea and induced inspiratory (~12%; p < 0.05 vs. UN) and expiratory (~10%; p < 0.05 vs. pre-exercise) respiratory muscle fatigue. Expiratory flow limitation was present in 50% of subjects during LH. Cardiac output and muscle oxygenation were maintained during LH despite reduced stroke volume (6%-8%; p < 0.05). Finally, cerebral oxygenated/total hemoglobin were elevated in the LH condition versus UH starting at 15 min (p < 0.05). Thoracic load carriage increases physiological strain and interferes with the compensatory response to hypoxic exposure.
期刊介绍:
Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.