Effect of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on Speech Discrimination in Noise in Multiple Sclerosis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Noise & Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.4103/nah.nah_71_23
Asuman Küçüköner, Ömer Küçüköner, Abdulkadir Özgür, Murat Terzi
{"title":"Effect of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on Speech Discrimination in Noise in Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Asuman Küçüköner, Ömer Küçüköner, Abdulkadir Özgür, Murat Terzi","doi":"10.4103/nah.nah_71_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience difficulties in understanding speech in noise despite having normal hearing.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the relationship between speech discrimination in noise (SDN) and medial olivocochlear reflex levels and to compare MS patients with a control group.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixty participants with normal hearing, comprising 30 MS patients and 30 healthy controls, were included. For both groups, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were recorded at frequencies of 1000, 1400, 2000, 2800, 4000, 5600 and 8000 in the presence and absence of contralateral white sound at 65 dB SPL. Speech discrimination tests in the presence and absence of noise, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale were applied to all participants to evaluate their cognitive skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In age- and sex-matched groups, the DPOAE signal-to-noise ratio value was 6.50 ± 1.30 in the right ear at a frequency of 8000 Hz in the control group and 2.40 ± 1.75 in the MS group (P < 0.05). In the comparison of suppression between ears, lower suppression was found at 1400 and 2000 Hz in the left ear and 1000 Hz in the right ear in the MS group (P < 0.05). In the control group, a moderately significant positive correlation existed between right ear SDN scores and left ear suppression values (P < 0.05). The cognitive functions of the MS group were lower in MoCA and SDMT (P < 0.05). Patients who scored less than 21 points in MoCA also had low suppression results (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive evaluations are necessary to uncover the presence of auditory perception disorders, such as noise sensitivity or speech disorders in noise, amongst MS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19195,"journal":{"name":"Noise & Health","volume":"26 123","pages":"507-513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_71_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience difficulties in understanding speech in noise despite having normal hearing.

Aim: This study aimed to determine the relationship between speech discrimination in noise (SDN) and medial olivocochlear reflex levels and to compare MS patients with a control group.

Material and methods: Sixty participants with normal hearing, comprising 30 MS patients and 30 healthy controls, were included. For both groups, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were recorded at frequencies of 1000, 1400, 2000, 2800, 4000, 5600 and 8000 in the presence and absence of contralateral white sound at 65 dB SPL. Speech discrimination tests in the presence and absence of noise, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale were applied to all participants to evaluate their cognitive skills.

Results: In age- and sex-matched groups, the DPOAE signal-to-noise ratio value was 6.50 ± 1.30 in the right ear at a frequency of 8000 Hz in the control group and 2.40 ± 1.75 in the MS group (P < 0.05). In the comparison of suppression between ears, lower suppression was found at 1400 and 2000 Hz in the left ear and 1000 Hz in the right ear in the MS group (P < 0.05). In the control group, a moderately significant positive correlation existed between right ear SDN scores and left ear suppression values (P < 0.05). The cognitive functions of the MS group were lower in MoCA and SDMT (P < 0.05). Patients who scored less than 21 points in MoCA also had low suppression results (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Comprehensive evaluations are necessary to uncover the presence of auditory perception disorders, such as noise sensitivity or speech disorders in noise, amongst MS patients.

内侧耳蜗传出神经对多发性硬化症噪声中言语辨别的影响。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)患者尽管听力正常,但在噪音环境中理解言语有困难。目的:本研究旨在确定噪声中言语辨别(SDN)与内侧耳蜗反射水平的关系,并将MS患者与对照组进行比较。材料和方法:60名听力正常的受试者,包括30名MS患者和30名健康对照。在对侧白声存在和不存在65 dB SPL的情况下,记录两组在1000、1400、2000、2800、4000、5600和8000频率下的畸变产物耳声发射(dpoae)。采用有噪声和无噪声情况下的语音辨别测试、符号数字模态测试(SDMT)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)量表对所有被试进行认知能力评估。结果:在年龄和性别匹配组中,在8000hz频率下,对照组右耳DPOAE信噪比为6.50±1.30,MS组为2.40±1.75 (P < 0.05)。两耳间抑制比较,MS组左耳1400、2000 Hz和右耳1000 Hz抑制较低(P < 0.05)。对照组右耳SDN评分与左耳抑制值呈中显著正相关(P < 0.05)。MS组的MoCA、SDMT认知功能明显降低(P < 0.05)。MoCA评分低于21分的患者抑制效果较差(P < 0.05)。结论:需要综合评价以发现MS患者是否存在听觉感知障碍,如噪声敏感性或噪声中的言语障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Noise & Health
Noise & Health AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Noise and Health is the only International Journal devoted to research on all aspects of noise and its effects on human health. An inter-disciplinary journal for all professions concerned with auditory and non-auditory effects of occupational, environmental, and leisure noise. It aims to provide a forum for presentation of novel research material on a broad range of topics associated with noise pollution, its control and its detrimental effects on hearing and health. It will cover issues from basic experimental science through clinical evaluation and management, technical aspects of noise reduction systems and solutions to environmental issues relating to social and public health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信