Susceptibility Patterns in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium avium Complex from a Hospital in Southern Spain.

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Adrián González Martínez, María Aguilera, María Tarriño, Ana Alberola, Juan Antonio Reguera, Antonio Sampedro, Jose María Navarro, Javier Rodríguez Granger
{"title":"Susceptibility Patterns in Clinical Isolates of <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Complex from a Hospital in Southern Spain.","authors":"Adrián González Martínez, María Aguilera, María Tarriño, Ana Alberola, Juan Antonio Reguera, Antonio Sampedro, Jose María Navarro, Javier Rodríguez Granger","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms12122613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of infections caused by the <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex (MAC) has risen significantly, posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study analyzed 134 clinical isolates of the <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex from southern Spain, performing in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing using a commercial microdilution technique to generate additional data, refine treatment strategies, and improve patient outcomes. Phenotypic susceptibility testing revealed clarithromycin and amikacin as the most effective antibiotics, with susceptibility rates exceeding 90%, while linezolid and moxifloxacin exhibited limited activity, with resistance rates of 49.3% and 41.8%. A comparative analysis between <i>M. avium</i> and <i>M. intracellulare</i> showed significant differences in resistance to amikacin and linezolid, with <i>M. avium</i> exhibiting higher resistance rates. Additionally, species-specific differences were observed in MIC distributions for ethionamide, ciprofloxacin, and streptomycin. Our data reveal regional variability in resistance patterns, particularly for moxifloxacin and linezolid, which exhibit differing resistance rates compared to studies from other regions. The significant MIC differences for several antibiotics between <i>M. avium</i> and <i>M. intracellulare</i> underscore the importance of species-level identification and the heterogeneity in resistance mechanisms within MAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of infections caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) has risen significantly, posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study analyzed 134 clinical isolates of the Mycobacterium avium complex from southern Spain, performing in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing using a commercial microdilution technique to generate additional data, refine treatment strategies, and improve patient outcomes. Phenotypic susceptibility testing revealed clarithromycin and amikacin as the most effective antibiotics, with susceptibility rates exceeding 90%, while linezolid and moxifloxacin exhibited limited activity, with resistance rates of 49.3% and 41.8%. A comparative analysis between M. avium and M. intracellulare showed significant differences in resistance to amikacin and linezolid, with M. avium exhibiting higher resistance rates. Additionally, species-specific differences were observed in MIC distributions for ethionamide, ciprofloxacin, and streptomycin. Our data reveal regional variability in resistance patterns, particularly for moxifloxacin and linezolid, which exhibit differing resistance rates compared to studies from other regions. The significant MIC differences for several antibiotics between M. avium and M. intracellulare underscore the importance of species-level identification and the heterogeneity in resistance mechanisms within MAC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信