Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri, Ali Esparham, Hossein Khadem Sedaghat, Shiva Safari, Seyed Nooredin Daryabari, Abdolreza Pazouki, Mohammad Kermansaravi
{"title":"Investigating the Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Primary Metabolic and Bariatric Restrictive Procedures.","authors":"Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri, Ali Esparham, Hossein Khadem Sedaghat, Shiva Safari, Seyed Nooredin Daryabari, Abdolreza Pazouki, Mohammad Kermansaravi","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07628-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies showed a high conversion rate and failure of restrictive procedures, including sleeve gastrectomy (SG), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), gastric plication (GP), and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) in a long-term follow-up. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) for weight loss and treatment of obesity-related problems after primary metabolic and bariatric restrictive procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study on prospectively collected data was conducted on a sample of 151 patients who experienced insufficient weight loss or weight regain after primary restrictive surgeries and underwent OAGB as a revisional procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 151 patients with a history of previous restrictive metabolic and bariatric surgery who underwent a revisional OAGB were included in this study. The restrictive procedures consisted of SG (n = 79), AGB (n = 45), GP (n = 15), and VBG (n = 12). Total weight loss percent (%TWL) after the revisional OAGB was 27.03 ± 9.12, 27.74 ± 10.05, 24.62 ± 9.87, and 24.34 ± 8.05 after 12, 24, 60, and 84 months, respectively. After 24 months of follow-up, TWL was significantly higher in the GP group compared to the AGB group. However, weight loss outcomes were not significantly different after 60 months of follow-up. The revisional OAGB was associated with a significant resolution of obesity-related problems, including type 2 diabetes (55.55%), hypertension (50%), dyslipidemia (77%), and obstructive sleep apnea (100%) after 2 years of follow-up. There was no serious complication after the revisional OAGB in the short- and long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OAGB is an efficient and safe option as a conversion surgery after restrictive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"525-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07628-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous studies showed a high conversion rate and failure of restrictive procedures, including sleeve gastrectomy (SG), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), gastric plication (GP), and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) in a long-term follow-up. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) for weight loss and treatment of obesity-related problems after primary metabolic and bariatric restrictive procedures.
Methods: A retrospective study on prospectively collected data was conducted on a sample of 151 patients who experienced insufficient weight loss or weight regain after primary restrictive surgeries and underwent OAGB as a revisional procedure.
Results: A total of 151 patients with a history of previous restrictive metabolic and bariatric surgery who underwent a revisional OAGB were included in this study. The restrictive procedures consisted of SG (n = 79), AGB (n = 45), GP (n = 15), and VBG (n = 12). Total weight loss percent (%TWL) after the revisional OAGB was 27.03 ± 9.12, 27.74 ± 10.05, 24.62 ± 9.87, and 24.34 ± 8.05 after 12, 24, 60, and 84 months, respectively. After 24 months of follow-up, TWL was significantly higher in the GP group compared to the AGB group. However, weight loss outcomes were not significantly different after 60 months of follow-up. The revisional OAGB was associated with a significant resolution of obesity-related problems, including type 2 diabetes (55.55%), hypertension (50%), dyslipidemia (77%), and obstructive sleep apnea (100%) after 2 years of follow-up. There was no serious complication after the revisional OAGB in the short- and long-term follow-up.
Conclusion: OAGB is an efficient and safe option as a conversion surgery after restrictive procedures.
期刊介绍：
Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions.
Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
