Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Amit Saxena, Cristina Sorrento, Peter Izmirly, Janine Sullivan, Monica Gamez-Perez, Jammie Law, Howard Michael Belmont, Jill P Buyon
{"title":"Low versus high initial oral glucocorticoid dose for lupus nephritis: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.","authors":"Amit Saxena, Cristina Sorrento, Peter Izmirly, Janine Sullivan, Monica Gamez-Perez, Jammie Law, Howard Michael Belmont, Jill P Buyon","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traditional initial treatment regimens for lupus nephritis (LN) used oral glucocorticoids (GC) in starting doses up to 1.0 mg/kg/day prednisone equivalent with or without a preceding intravenous methylprednisolone pulse. More recent management guidelines recommend lower starting oral GC doses following intravenous pulse therapy. As there have been no large studies directly comparing patients receiving low versus high initial oral GC doses, this pooled analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate differences in efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published data were analysed from RCTs that assessed variable GC doses in the standard of care (SOC) treatment arms. Patients receiving starting prednisone doses up to 0.5 mg/kg/day (low dose) were compared with 1.0 mg/kg/day (high dose). Complete renal response requiring urine protein-creatinine ratio <0.5 mg/mg (CRR 0.5), CRR or partial renal response (PRR), serious adverse events (SAE) and SAE due to infections at 12 months of treatment were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>417 patients from SOC arms of five studies were exposed to low-dose initial GC after intravenous pulse, while 521 patients from four studies were treated with high-dose oral GC. In patients with low-dose oral GC, 25.2% achieved CRR 0.5 at 12 months compared with 27.2% in high-dose groups, p=0.54. CRR or PRR was attained in 48.7% low-dose vs 43.6% high-dose patients, p=0.14. SAEs and infection SAEs were less common in the low-dose GC group (19.4% vs 31.6%, p<0.001 and 9.8% vs 16.5%, p=0.012, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on pooled RCT data, there was no significant difference in 12-month renal responses between patients receiving low-dose prednisone following intravenous GC compared with those receiving initial high doses. SAEs were less frequent in patients receiving low-dose initial GC. These findings support the use of lower oral GC doses in LN treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Traditional initial treatment regimens for lupus nephritis (LN) used oral glucocorticoids (GC) in starting doses up to 1.0 mg/kg/day prednisone equivalent with or without a preceding intravenous methylprednisolone pulse. More recent management guidelines recommend lower starting oral GC doses following intravenous pulse therapy. As there have been no large studies directly comparing patients receiving low versus high initial oral GC doses, this pooled analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate differences in efficacy and safety.

Methods: Published data were analysed from RCTs that assessed variable GC doses in the standard of care (SOC) treatment arms. Patients receiving starting prednisone doses up to 0.5 mg/kg/day (low dose) were compared with 1.0 mg/kg/day (high dose). Complete renal response requiring urine protein-creatinine ratio <0.5 mg/mg (CRR 0.5), CRR or partial renal response (PRR), serious adverse events (SAE) and SAE due to infections at 12 months of treatment were compared between groups.

Results: 417 patients from SOC arms of five studies were exposed to low-dose initial GC after intravenous pulse, while 521 patients from four studies were treated with high-dose oral GC. In patients with low-dose oral GC, 25.2% achieved CRR 0.5 at 12 months compared with 27.2% in high-dose groups, p=0.54. CRR or PRR was attained in 48.7% low-dose vs 43.6% high-dose patients, p=0.14. SAEs and infection SAEs were less common in the low-dose GC group (19.4% vs 31.6%, p<0.001 and 9.8% vs 16.5%, p=0.012, respectively).

Conclusions: Based on pooled RCT data, there was no significant difference in 12-month renal responses between patients receiving low-dose prednisone following intravenous GC compared with those receiving initial high doses. SAEs were less frequent in patients receiving low-dose initial GC. These findings support the use of lower oral GC doses in LN treatment.

低与高初始口服糖皮质激素剂量狼疮肾炎:随机对照临床试验的汇总分析。
目的:狼疮性肾炎(LN)的传统初始治疗方案是口服糖皮质激素(GC),起始剂量高达1.0 mg/kg/天,相当于强的松,之前静脉注射甲基强的松。最近的管理指南建议在静脉脉冲治疗后降低起始口服GC剂量。由于没有大型研究直接比较患者接受低剂量和高剂量的初始口服GC,本高质量随机对照试验(rct)的汇总分析旨在评估疗效和安全性的差异。方法:从评估标准护理(SOC)治疗组中可变GC剂量的随机对照试验中分析已发表的数据。开始接受强的松剂量高达0.5 mg/kg/天(低剂量)的患者与1.0 mg/kg/天(高剂量)的患者进行比较。结果:来自5项研究的417例SOC组患者接受静脉脉冲后低剂量初始GC治疗,而来自4项研究的521例患者接受高剂量口服GC治疗。在低剂量口服GC患者中,25.2%在12个月时达到CRR 0.5,而高剂量组为27.2%,p=0.54。低剂量患者达到CRR或PRR的比例为48.7%,高剂量患者为43.6%,p=0.14。在低剂量GC组中,SAEs和感染性SAEs的发生率较低(19.4% vs 31.6%)。结论:基于汇总的RCT数据,静脉GC后接受低剂量泼尼松治疗的患者与初始接受高剂量泼尼松治疗的患者在12个月的肾脏反应方面没有显著差异。初始接受低剂量GC的患者发生SAEs的频率较低。这些发现支持在LN治疗中使用低剂量的口服GC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信