A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block for Pain Management in Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tianwen Chen, Mingying Li, Yuchen Liu, Xiaoxia Zhang, Xiaoli Sun, Jie Li, Miao He, Zhenyuan Wang
{"title":"A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block for Pain Management in Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh.","authors":"Tianwen Chen, Mingying Li, Yuchen Liu, Xiaoxia Zhang, Xiaoli Sun, Jie Li, Miao He, Zhenyuan Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S481853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 patients scheduled for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with IPOM were selected and randomly assigned to either the group receiving general anesthesia combined with bilateral rectus sheath block (Group GR, 71 patients) or the group receiving general anesthesia alone (Group G, 68 patients). We monitored the patients' heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at four time points: before anesthesia induction (T1), at the start of surgery (T2), during mesh fixation (T3), and upon removal of the laryngeal mask (T4). Postoperative pain levels were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 hour (T5), 6 hours (T6), and 12 hours (T7) after surgery while resting, as well as at 24 hours (T8) during activity. We also compared the number of times the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump was pressed and the use of additional analgesics within 24 hours post-surgery, along with recording any adverse reactions and complications associated with RSB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At time points T2 and T3, the HR and MAP in Group GR were significantly lower than those in Group G (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, VAS scores at various postoperative intervals were lower in Group GR, with significant differences noted at T5, T7, and T8 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Group GR also had significantly fewer presses on the analgesia pump within 24 hours post-surgery compared to Group G, while the incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided RSB is a straightforward and safe technique for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with IPOM. It offers clear analgesic benefits and significantly reduces early postoperative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S481853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM).

Methods: A total of 139 patients scheduled for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with IPOM were selected and randomly assigned to either the group receiving general anesthesia combined with bilateral rectus sheath block (Group GR, 71 patients) or the group receiving general anesthesia alone (Group G, 68 patients). We monitored the patients' heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at four time points: before anesthesia induction (T1), at the start of surgery (T2), during mesh fixation (T3), and upon removal of the laryngeal mask (T4). Postoperative pain levels were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 hour (T5), 6 hours (T6), and 12 hours (T7) after surgery while resting, as well as at 24 hours (T8) during activity. We also compared the number of times the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump was pressed and the use of additional analgesics within 24 hours post-surgery, along with recording any adverse reactions and complications associated with RSB.

Results: At time points T2 and T3, the HR and MAP in Group GR were significantly lower than those in Group G (P < 0.05). Additionally, VAS scores at various postoperative intervals were lower in Group GR, with significant differences noted at T5, T7, and T8 (P < 0.05). Group GR also had significantly fewer presses on the analgesia pump within 24 hours post-surgery compared to Group G, while the incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided RSB is a straightforward and safe technique for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with IPOM. It offers clear analgesic benefits and significantly reduces early postoperative pain.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信