Using Transcranial Magnetic Nerve Stimulation to Differentiate Motor and Sensory Fascicles in a Mixed Nerve: Experimental Rat Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Kota Hayashi, Tsung-Hsun Hsieh, Yen-Lin Huang, David Chwei-Chin Chuang
{"title":"Using Transcranial Magnetic Nerve Stimulation to Differentiate Motor and Sensory Fascicles in a Mixed Nerve: Experimental Rat Study.","authors":"Kota Hayashi, Tsung-Hsun Hsieh, Yen-Lin Huang, David Chwei-Chin Chuang","doi":"10.1055/a-2483-5556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Accurately matching the correct fascicles in a ruptured mixed nerve is critical for functional recovery. This study investigates the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to differentiate motor and sensory fascicles in a mixed nerve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> In all 40 rats, the median nerve in the left upper arm was evenly split into three segments. The rats were separated into two groups. In Group A (20 rats), the segment with the highest amplitude during TMS was selected as the motor neurotizer and transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. In Group B (20 rats), only the medial one-third segment was selected and transferred without using TMS. The results were compared using grooming tests, nerve electrophysiological studies, muscle tetanus contraction force measurements, muscle weight, and axon counts at 16 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The grooming test showed that Group A performed significantly better than Group B at 12 and 16 weeks postoperatively. Tetanic muscle contraction force measurements also revealed that Group A had significantly better outcomes than Group B. However, electrophysiological testing, muscle weight, and axon counts showed no significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study suggests that TMS can be used to distinguish motor fascicles from sensory fascicles in a mixed nerve. It is desirable to apply this technique intraoperatively to differentiate motor and sensory fascicles for appropriate nerve matching and to select the motor fascicles as a motor neurotizer for functioning free muscle innervation in human mixed nerve injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2483-5556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Accurately matching the correct fascicles in a ruptured mixed nerve is critical for functional recovery. This study investigates the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to differentiate motor and sensory fascicles in a mixed nerve.

Methods:  In all 40 rats, the median nerve in the left upper arm was evenly split into three segments. The rats were separated into two groups. In Group A (20 rats), the segment with the highest amplitude during TMS was selected as the motor neurotizer and transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. In Group B (20 rats), only the medial one-third segment was selected and transferred without using TMS. The results were compared using grooming tests, nerve electrophysiological studies, muscle tetanus contraction force measurements, muscle weight, and axon counts at 16 weeks.

Results:  The grooming test showed that Group A performed significantly better than Group B at 12 and 16 weeks postoperatively. Tetanic muscle contraction force measurements also revealed that Group A had significantly better outcomes than Group B. However, electrophysiological testing, muscle weight, and axon counts showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion:  This study suggests that TMS can be used to distinguish motor fascicles from sensory fascicles in a mixed nerve. It is desirable to apply this technique intraoperatively to differentiate motor and sensory fascicles for appropriate nerve matching and to select the motor fascicles as a motor neurotizer for functioning free muscle innervation in human mixed nerve injury.

经颅磁神经刺激分化混合神经运动束和感觉束的实验研究。
背景:在混合神经断裂中准确匹配正确的神经束对功能恢复至关重要。本研究探讨了使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)来区分混合神经的运动束和感觉束。方法:将40只大鼠左上臂正中神经均匀分成3段。大鼠被分成两组。A组(20只大鼠)选取经颅磁刺激时振幅最大的段作为运动神经毒剂,转移至肌皮神经。B组(20只大鼠)只选取内侧三分之一节段,不经经颅磁刺激转移。通过梳理试验、神经电生理研究、肌肉破伤风收缩力测量、肌肉重量和16周轴突计数对结果进行比较。结果:术后12周和16周,毛发整理试验显示A组明显优于B组。强直肌收缩力测量也显示A组的结果明显优于b组。然而,电生理测试、肌肉重量和轴突计数在两组之间没有显着差异。结论:本研究提示经颅磁刺激可以区分混合神经的运动束和感觉束。术中应用该技术区分运动神经束和感觉神经束以进行适当的神经匹配,并选择运动神经束作为运动神经毒剂用于人类混合神经损伤的自由肌肉神经支配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信