Effect of Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation on Esophageal Motility in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Study Based on High-resolution Impedance Manometry.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chien-Chuan Chen, Chu-Kuang Chou, Ming-Ching Yuan, Kun-Feng Tsai, Jia-Feng Wu, Wei-Chi Liao, Han-Mo Chiu, Hsiu-Po Wang, Ming-Shiang Wu, Ping-Huei Tseng
{"title":"Effect of Anti-reflux Mucosal Ablation on Esophageal Motility in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Study Based on High-resolution Impedance Manometry.","authors":"Chien-Chuan Chen, Chu-Kuang Chou, Ming-Ching Yuan, Kun-Feng Tsai, Jia-Feng Wu, Wei-Chi Liao, Han-Mo Chiu, Hsiu-Po Wang, Ming-Shiang Wu, Ping-Huei Tseng","doi":"10.5056/jnm24055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) is a promising endoscopic intervention for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the effect of ARMA on esophageal motility remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with PPI-dependent GERD receiving ARMA were prospectively enrolled. Comprehensive self-report symptom questionnaires, endoscopy, 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring, and high-resolution impedance manometry were performed and analyzed before and 3 months after ARMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All ARMA procedures were performed successfully. Symptom scores, including GerdQ (11.16 ± 2.67 to 9.11 ± 2.64, <i>P</i> = 0.026) and reflux symptom index (11.63 ± 5.62 to 6.11 ± 3.86, <i>P</i> = 0.001), improved significantly, while 13 patients (65%) reported discontinuation of PPI. Total acid exposure time (5.84 ± 4.63% to 2.83 ± 3.41%, <i>P</i> = 0.024) and number of reflux episodes (73.05 ± 19.34 to 37.55 ± 22.71, <i>P</i> < 0.001) decreased significantly after ARMA. Improved esophagogastric junction (EGJ) barrier function, including increased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (13.89 ± 10.78 mmHg to 21.68 ± 11.5 mmHg, <i>P</i> = 0.034), 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (5.75 ± 6.42 mmHg to 9.99 ± 5.89 mmHg, <i>P</i> = 0.020), and EGJ-contractile integral (16.42 ± 16.93 mmHg·cm to 31.95 ± 21.25 mmHg·cm, <i>P</i> = 0.016), were observed. Esophageal body contractility also increased significantly (distal contractile integral, 966.85 ± 845.84 mmHg·s·cm to 1198.8 ± 811.74 mmHg·s·cm, <i>P</i> = 0.023). Patients with symptom improvement had better pre-AMRA esophageal body contractility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ARMA effectively improves symptoms and reflux burden, EGJ barrier function, and esophageal body contractility in patients with PPIdependent GERD during short-term evaluation. Longer follow-up to clarify the sustainability of ARMA is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":"31 1","pages":"75-85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm24055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) is a promising endoscopic intervention for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the effect of ARMA on esophageal motility remains unclear.

Methods: Twenty patients with PPI-dependent GERD receiving ARMA were prospectively enrolled. Comprehensive self-report symptom questionnaires, endoscopy, 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring, and high-resolution impedance manometry were performed and analyzed before and 3 months after ARMA.

Results: All ARMA procedures were performed successfully. Symptom scores, including GerdQ (11.16 ± 2.67 to 9.11 ± 2.64, P = 0.026) and reflux symptom index (11.63 ± 5.62 to 6.11 ± 3.86, P = 0.001), improved significantly, while 13 patients (65%) reported discontinuation of PPI. Total acid exposure time (5.84 ± 4.63% to 2.83 ± 3.41%, P = 0.024) and number of reflux episodes (73.05 ± 19.34 to 37.55 ± 22.71, P < 0.001) decreased significantly after ARMA. Improved esophagogastric junction (EGJ) barrier function, including increased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (13.89 ± 10.78 mmHg to 21.68 ± 11.5 mmHg, P = 0.034), 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (5.75 ± 6.42 mmHg to 9.99 ± 5.89 mmHg, P = 0.020), and EGJ-contractile integral (16.42 ± 16.93 mmHg·cm to 31.95 ± 21.25 mmHg·cm, P = 0.016), were observed. Esophageal body contractility also increased significantly (distal contractile integral, 966.85 ± 845.84 mmHg·s·cm to 1198.8 ± 811.74 mmHg·s·cm, P = 0.023). Patients with symptom improvement had better pre-AMRA esophageal body contractility.

Conclusions: ARMA effectively improves symptoms and reflux burden, EGJ barrier function, and esophageal body contractility in patients with PPIdependent GERD during short-term evaluation. Longer follow-up to clarify the sustainability of ARMA is needed.

基于高分辨率阻抗测压法的抗反流粘膜消融对胃食管反流病患者食管运动的影响
背景/目的:抗反流粘膜消融(ARMA)是治疗质子泵抑制剂(PPI)依赖性胃食管反流病(GERD)的一种有前景的内镜干预方法。然而,ARMA对食管运动的影响尚不清楚。方法:前瞻性纳入20例接受ARMA治疗的ppi依赖型胃食管反流患者。在ARMA前和ARMA后3个月进行全面的自我报告症状问卷调查、内窥镜检查、24小时阻抗- ph监测和高分辨率阻抗测压。结果:所有ARMA手术均成功。症状评分GerdQ(11.16±2.67 ~ 9.11±2.64,P = 0.026)和反流症状指数(11.63±5.62 ~ 6.11±3.86,P = 0.001)明显改善,13例(65%)患者报告停用PPI。总酸暴露时间(5.84±4.63% ~ 2.83±3.41%,P = 0.024)和反流次数(73.05±19.34 ~ 37.55±22.71次,P < 0.001)均显著降低。食管胃交界(EGJ)屏障功能改善,包括食管下括括肌静息压(13.89±10.78 mmHg至21.68±11.5 mmHg, P = 0.034)、4秒综合松弛压(5.75±6.42 mmHg至9.99±5.89 mmHg, P = 0.020)和EGJ-收缩积分(16.42±16.93 mmHg·cm至31.95±21.25 mmHg·cm, P = 0.016)增加。远端收缩积分从966.85±845.84 mmHg·s·cm增至1198.8±811.74 mmHg·s·cm, P = 0.023)。症状改善的患者amra前食管体收缩力较好。结论:在短期评估中,ARMA有效改善了pp依赖型胃食管反流患者的症状和反流负担、EGJ屏障功能和食管体收缩力。需要更长的后续行动,以澄清ARMA的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (J Neurogastroenterol Motil) is a joint official journal of the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Thai Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society, the Japanese Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Indian Motility and Functional Disease Association, the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Motility, the South East Asia Gastro-Neuro Motility Association, the Taiwan Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association, launched in January 2010 after the title change from the Korean Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, published from 1994 to 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信