{"title":"Potential challenges to harmonize post-stroke cognitive assessment and its prognostic value: a narrative review.","authors":"Margarita Alexandrova","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With advances in scientific and clinical knowledge, stroke has evolved from a major cause of death to a chronic condition affecting the daily lives of sufferers, their relatives, and society. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is common even among individuals with good neurological recovery. When deciding on interventions aimed to improve the life quality of post-stroke patients, identifying those at high risk of cognitive decline proves crucial. Given the complexity of PSCI assessment, this narrative review discusses the feasibility of developing standardized criteria for selecting cognitive instruments. Potential approaches for establishing harmonized procedures for post-stroke cognitive assessment are presented depending on how the cognitive impairment is defined, the cognitive domains examined, the methods used to generalize cognitive data by components/domains, and their normalization against standardized normative samples. The prognostic value of cognitive assessment to identify patients at high risk of PSCI, functional dependence, and poor survival is also discussed. Implementing harmonized criteria for assessing the cognitive status of stroke patients could reduce the now considerable heterogeneity between studies and serve as a reliable basis for determining the prevalence and predicting the occurrence/aggravation of PSCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 11","pages":"963-977"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With advances in scientific and clinical knowledge, stroke has evolved from a major cause of death to a chronic condition affecting the daily lives of sufferers, their relatives, and society. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is common even among individuals with good neurological recovery. When deciding on interventions aimed to improve the life quality of post-stroke patients, identifying those at high risk of cognitive decline proves crucial. Given the complexity of PSCI assessment, this narrative review discusses the feasibility of developing standardized criteria for selecting cognitive instruments. Potential approaches for establishing harmonized procedures for post-stroke cognitive assessment are presented depending on how the cognitive impairment is defined, the cognitive domains examined, the methods used to generalize cognitive data by components/domains, and their normalization against standardized normative samples. The prognostic value of cognitive assessment to identify patients at high risk of PSCI, functional dependence, and poor survival is also discussed. Implementing harmonized criteria for assessing the cognitive status of stroke patients could reduce the now considerable heterogeneity between studies and serve as a reliable basis for determining the prevalence and predicting the occurrence/aggravation of PSCI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.