Quality of life among geriatric population living with functional disabilities: A comparison between urban and rural populations of West Bengal.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Aritraa Hazra, Sukanta Majumdar, Shuvankar Mukherjee, Avijit Paul, Nabanita Bhattacharyya
{"title":"Quality of life among geriatric population living with functional disabilities: A comparison between urban and rural populations of West Bengal.","authors":"Aritraa Hazra, Sukanta Majumdar, Shuvankar Mukherjee, Avijit Paul, Nabanita Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1861_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Global elderly population's growth is evident, with projections reaching 2 billion by 2050, while India's geriatric population is expected to rise to 11.6% by 2026. Disparity in quality of life (QOL) and disabilities between urban and rural elderly exist, where rural elderly maintain active roles, while urban counterparts face economic insecurity post retirement.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study explores QOL differences among geriatric individuals with functional disabilities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional descriptive observational study conducted among geriatric populations from urban Dhapa and rural Khalia, who were surveyed. The sample size was 100 for both urban and rural areas. Data collection involved interviews with predesigned, pretested, semistructured schedules. Systematic random sampling was used for participant selection.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Among the study populations, 64% and 62% were male population, 63% and 76% were from general caste, 43% and 42% were in the age group of old to very old (70-79 years), 41% and 26% were gainfully employed, 18% and 96% were belonging to lower-middle to lower socioeconomic class in urban and rural areas, respectively. The study revealed 28% urban and 49% rural study population and 28% were disabled. While assessing QOL, statistically significant differences were found in the environmental domain and social relationship domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Around 1/3<sup>rd</sup> in urban areas and nearly ½ in rural regions were disabled. Older individuals, Muslim community, general caste, and lower socioeconomic class were predicting factors. Physical, psychological, and social-relationship domain scores were higher among rural population, and the environmental domain mean score was higher among the urban populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"13 12","pages":"5500-5505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11709047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1861_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Global elderly population's growth is evident, with projections reaching 2 billion by 2050, while India's geriatric population is expected to rise to 11.6% by 2026. Disparity in quality of life (QOL) and disabilities between urban and rural elderly exist, where rural elderly maintain active roles, while urban counterparts face economic insecurity post retirement.

Aims: The study explores QOL differences among geriatric individuals with functional disabilities.

Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive observational study conducted among geriatric populations from urban Dhapa and rural Khalia, who were surveyed. The sample size was 100 for both urban and rural areas. Data collection involved interviews with predesigned, pretested, semistructured schedules. Systematic random sampling was used for participant selection.

Result: Among the study populations, 64% and 62% were male population, 63% and 76% were from general caste, 43% and 42% were in the age group of old to very old (70-79 years), 41% and 26% were gainfully employed, 18% and 96% were belonging to lower-middle to lower socioeconomic class in urban and rural areas, respectively. The study revealed 28% urban and 49% rural study population and 28% were disabled. While assessing QOL, statistically significant differences were found in the environmental domain and social relationship domain.

Conclusion: Around 1/3rd in urban areas and nearly ½ in rural regions were disabled. Older individuals, Muslim community, general caste, and lower socioeconomic class were predicting factors. Physical, psychological, and social-relationship domain scores were higher among rural population, and the environmental domain mean score was higher among the urban populations.

功能性残疾老年人口的生活质量:西孟加拉邦城乡人口的比较。
导读:全球老年人口增长明显,预计到2050年将达到20亿,而印度的老年人口预计到2026年将上升到11.6%。城乡老年人在生活质量和残疾方面存在差距,农村老年人发挥着积极的作用,而城市老年人在退休后面临经济不安全。目的:探讨老年功能障碍患者生活质量的差异。材料和方法:这是一项横断面描述性观察研究,对来自Dhapa城市和Khalia农村的老年人群进行了调查。城市和农村地区的样本量为100人。数据收集包括预先设计、预先测试、半结构化时间表的访谈。采用系统随机抽样进行参与者选择。结果:在研究人群中,男性占64%和62%,普通种姓占63%和76%,老年至高龄年龄组(70-79岁)占43%和42%,有酬就业占41%和26%,城市和农村社会经济阶层分别占18%和96%。研究显示,28%的研究对象为城市人口,49%为农村人口,28%为残疾人。在评估生活质量时,环境领域和社会关系领域的差异有统计学意义。结论:城市残疾人约占1/3,农村残疾人约占1/ 2。老年人、穆斯林社区、一般种姓和较低的社会经济阶层是预测因素。农村人口的生理、心理和社会关系领域得分较高,城市人口的环境领域平均得分较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信