Effects of Different Bowel Preparation Regimens and Age Factors on the Gut Microbiota: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yuhang Zhou, Huihui Ji, Shuang Zhang, Xiangrong Zhang, Junhai Zhang, Yujing Wang, Huifen Wang, Yanli Zhang, Shiyu Du
{"title":"Effects of Different Bowel Preparation Regimens and Age Factors on the Gut Microbiota: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Yuhang Zhou, Huihui Ji, Shuang Zhang, Xiangrong Zhang, Junhai Zhang, Yujing Wang, Huifen Wang, Yanli Zhang, Shiyu Du","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opinions about the impact of bowel preparation on the gut microbiota are divided. This study investigated the effects of different regimens on the gut microbiota post-bowel preparation and the differences in responses across different age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial included 194 patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: one group receiving polyethylene glycol (n = 108) and one receiving sodium picosulfate (n = 86) for bowel preparation. Fecal samples were collected at baseline and on days 7 and 14 post-bowel preparation. The microbiota's diversity and composition were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, followed by comparative analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gut microbiota's abundance and diversity in patients significantly decreased post-bowel preparation, which did not recover to the level of pre-bowel preparation on Day 14. When comparing different regimens, the polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulfate groups recovered faster in richness and diversity, respectively. Patients aged < 65 years had higher richness and diversity of the gut microbiota, whereas the microbiota structure in those aged ≥ 65 years returned to the baseline state faster. The structure of beta diversity is significantly altered and did not return in the short term. However, in the elderly population aged ≥ 65 years, it can rebound quickly. This study also identified a number of significantly altered bacterial genera.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following the use of different bowel preparation regimens, the gut microbiota recovers in diverse ways, with older people over 65 experiencing a faster recovery of the microbial structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opinions about the impact of bowel preparation on the gut microbiota are divided. This study investigated the effects of different regimens on the gut microbiota post-bowel preparation and the differences in responses across different age groups.

Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial included 194 patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: one group receiving polyethylene glycol (n = 108) and one receiving sodium picosulfate (n = 86) for bowel preparation. Fecal samples were collected at baseline and on days 7 and 14 post-bowel preparation. The microbiota's diversity and composition were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, followed by comparative analyses.

Results: The gut microbiota's abundance and diversity in patients significantly decreased post-bowel preparation, which did not recover to the level of pre-bowel preparation on Day 14. When comparing different regimens, the polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulfate groups recovered faster in richness and diversity, respectively. Patients aged < 65 years had higher richness and diversity of the gut microbiota, whereas the microbiota structure in those aged ≥ 65 years returned to the baseline state faster. The structure of beta diversity is significantly altered and did not return in the short term. However, in the elderly population aged ≥ 65 years, it can rebound quickly. This study also identified a number of significantly altered bacterial genera.

Conclusions: Following the use of different bowel preparation regimens, the gut microbiota recovers in diverse ways, with older people over 65 experiencing a faster recovery of the microbial structure.

不同肠道准备方案和年龄因素对肠道微生物群的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
背景:关于肠道准备对肠道微生物群的影响,意见不一。本研究调查了不同方案对肠道准备后肠道微生物群的影响,以及不同年龄组的反应差异。方法:本研究为单中心、前瞻性、随机对照临床试验,纳入194例患者。患者分为两组:一组接受聚乙二醇(n = 108),另一组接受pico硫酸钠(n = 86)进行肠道准备。在基线和肠道准备后第7天和第14天收集粪便样本。采用16S核糖体RNA基因测序分析微生物群的多样性和组成,并进行对比分析。结果:患者肠道菌群的丰度和多样性在肠道准备后显著降低,在第14天没有恢复到肠道准备前的水平。当比较不同的方案时,聚乙二醇和皮硫酸钠基团在丰富度和多样性上分别恢复得更快。结论:在使用不同的肠道准备方案后,肠道微生物群以不同的方式恢复,65岁以上的老年人的微生物结构恢复得更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信