Alejandro de la Sierra, Luis M Ruilope, Natalie Staplin, George S Stergiou, Bryan Williams
{"title":"Mortality risks in different subtypes of masked hypertension in the Spanish ambulatory blood pressure monitoring registry.","authors":"Alejandro de la Sierra, Luis M Ruilope, Natalie Staplin, George S Stergiou, Bryan Williams","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the risks of death and cardiovascular death of different subtypes of masked hypertension, defined by either isolated daytime or nighttime blood pressure (BP) elevation, or both, compared with patients with normal both office and 24-h BP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 4999 patients with masked hypertension (normal office BP and elevated 24-h BP). They were divided in three different categories: isolated daytime masked hypertension (elevated daytime BP and normal nighttime BP, 800 patients), isolated nighttime masked hypertension (elevated nighttime BP and normal daytime BP, 1069 patients) and daytime and nighttime masked hypertension (elevation of both daytime and nighttime BP, 2989). All-cause and cardiovascular death (median follow-up 9.7 years) were assessed in each of these subtypes in comparison to 10 006 patients with normal both office and 24-h BP. Hazard ratios from Cox models after adjustment for clinical confounders were used for such comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with patients with normal both office and 24-h BP, isolated daytime masked hypertension was not associated with an increased risk of death in models adjusted for clinical confounders [hazard ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-1.43]. In contrast, isolated nighttime masked hypertension (hazard ratio: 1.39; 95% CI 1.19-1.63) and daytime and nighttime masked hypertension (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI 1.08-1.37) had an increased risk of death in comparison to patients with BP in the normal range. Similar results were observed for cardiovascular death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of death in masked hypertension is not homogeneous and requires nocturnal BP elevation, either isolated or with daytime elevation. Isolated daytime masked hypertension is not associated with an increased risk of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the risks of death and cardiovascular death of different subtypes of masked hypertension, defined by either isolated daytime or nighttime blood pressure (BP) elevation, or both, compared with patients with normal both office and 24-h BP.
Methods: We selected 4999 patients with masked hypertension (normal office BP and elevated 24-h BP). They were divided in three different categories: isolated daytime masked hypertension (elevated daytime BP and normal nighttime BP, 800 patients), isolated nighttime masked hypertension (elevated nighttime BP and normal daytime BP, 1069 patients) and daytime and nighttime masked hypertension (elevation of both daytime and nighttime BP, 2989). All-cause and cardiovascular death (median follow-up 9.7 years) were assessed in each of these subtypes in comparison to 10 006 patients with normal both office and 24-h BP. Hazard ratios from Cox models after adjustment for clinical confounders were used for such comparisons.
Results: Compared with patients with normal both office and 24-h BP, isolated daytime masked hypertension was not associated with an increased risk of death in models adjusted for clinical confounders [hazard ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-1.43]. In contrast, isolated nighttime masked hypertension (hazard ratio: 1.39; 95% CI 1.19-1.63) and daytime and nighttime masked hypertension (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI 1.08-1.37) had an increased risk of death in comparison to patients with BP in the normal range. Similar results were observed for cardiovascular death.
Conclusion: The risk of death in masked hypertension is not homogeneous and requires nocturnal BP elevation, either isolated or with daytime elevation. Isolated daytime masked hypertension is not associated with an increased risk of death.
目的:与办公室和24小时血压正常的患者相比,我们旨在评估不同亚型隐性高血压的死亡和心血管死亡风险,隐性高血压的定义是白天或夜间单独血压(BP)升高,或两者兼有。方法:我们选择了4999例隐蔽性高血压患者(办公室血压正常,24小时血压升高)。他们被分为三种不同的类别:孤立性白天隐蔽性高血压(白天血压升高和夜间血压正常,800例)、孤立性夜间隐蔽性高血压(夜间血压升高和白天血压正常,1069例)和白天和夜间隐蔽性高血压(白天和夜间血压均升高,2989例)。与1006例办公室血压和24小时血压正常的患者相比,对每种亚型的全因死亡和心血管死亡(中位随访9.7年)进行了评估。校正临床混杂因素后的Cox模型风险比用于此类比较。结果:与办公室血压和24小时血压均正常的患者相比,在经临床混杂因素校正的模型中,孤立性白天隐蔽性高血压与死亡风险增加无关[危险比1.07;95%置信区间(CI): 0.80-1.43]。单独夜间隐匿性高血压(风险比:1.39;95% CI 1.19-1.63)和白天和夜间隐匿性高血压(风险比:1.22;95% CI 1.08-1.37)与血压正常范围的患者相比,死亡风险增加。在心血管死亡中也观察到类似的结果。结论:隐蔽性高血压的死亡风险不均匀,需要夜间血压升高,可以单独升高,也可以日间升高。孤立的日间隐蔽性高血压与死亡风险增加无关。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.