Predicting All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Sleep-Related Features: A Machine-Learning Approach.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hyun-Ji Kim, Hakseung Kim, Dong-Joo Kim
{"title":"Predicting All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Sleep-Related Features: A Machine-Learning Approach.","authors":"Hyun-Ji Kim, Hakseung Kim, Dong-Joo Kim","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2024.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including mortality. Machine-learning algorithms have shown potential in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with OSA. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine-learning algorithm for predicting 10- and 15-year all-cause mortality in patients with OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with OSA were stratified into deceased and alive groups based on mortality outcomes. Various sleep-related features were analyzed, including objective sleep measures and the heart-rate variability during various sleep stages. The light gradient-boosting machine (LGBM) algorithm was employed to construct a risk-stratification model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting mortality over 10 and 15 years. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional-hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that parasympathetic activity was higher in OSA patients with worse outcomes than in those with better outcomes. The LGBM-based prediction model with sleep-related features was moderately accurate, with a mean AUC of 0.806 for predicting 10- and 15-year mortality. Furthermore, survival analysis demonstrated that LGBM could significantly distinguish the high- and low-risk groups, as evidenced by Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has confirmed the potential of sleep-related feature analysis and the LGBM algorithm for evaluating the mortality risk in OSA patients. The developed risk-stratification model offers an efficient and interpretable tool for clinicians that emphasizes the significance of patient-specific autonomic responses in mortality prediction. Incorporating survival analysis further validated the robustness of the model in predicting long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":"21 1","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2024.0038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including mortality. Machine-learning algorithms have shown potential in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with OSA. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine-learning algorithm for predicting 10- and 15-year all-cause mortality in patients with OSA.

Methods: Patients with OSA were stratified into deceased and alive groups based on mortality outcomes. Various sleep-related features were analyzed, including objective sleep measures and the heart-rate variability during various sleep stages. The light gradient-boosting machine (LGBM) algorithm was employed to construct a risk-stratification model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting mortality over 10 and 15 years. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional-hazards model.

Results: This study found that parasympathetic activity was higher in OSA patients with worse outcomes than in those with better outcomes. The LGBM-based prediction model with sleep-related features was moderately accurate, with a mean AUC of 0.806 for predicting 10- and 15-year mortality. Furthermore, survival analysis demonstrated that LGBM could significantly distinguish the high- and low-risk groups, as evidenced by Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression results.

Conclusions: This study has confirmed the potential of sleep-related feature analysis and the LGBM algorithm for evaluating the mortality risk in OSA patients. The developed risk-stratification model offers an efficient and interpretable tool for clinicians that emphasizes the significance of patient-specific autonomic responses in mortality prediction. Incorporating survival analysis further validated the robustness of the model in predicting long-term outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurology
Journal of Clinical Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信