{"title":"Glutamine metabolism is systemically different between primary and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived brain microvascular endothelial cells.","authors":"Callie M Weber, Bilal Moiz, Marzyeh Kheradmand, Arielle Scott, Claire Kettula, Brooke Wunderler, Viviana Alpízar Vargas, Alisa Morss Clyne","doi":"10.1177/0271678X241310729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human primary (hpBMEC) and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived brain microvascular endothelial-like cells (hiBMEC) are interchangeably used in blood-brain barrier models to study neurological diseases and drug delivery. Both hpBMEC and hiBMEC use glutamine as a source of carbon and nitrogen to produce metabolites and build proteins essential to cell function and communication. We used metabolomic, transcriptomic, and computational methods to examine how hpBMEC and hiBMEC metabolize glutamine, which may impact their utility in modeling the blood-brain barrier. We found that glutamine metabolism was systemically different between the two cell types. hpBMEC had a higher metabolic rate and produced more glutamate and GABA, while hiBMEC rerouted glutamine to produce more glutathione, fatty acids, and asparagine. Higher glutathione production in hiBMEC correlated with higher oxidative stress compared to hpBMEC. α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) supplementation increased glutamate secretion from hiBMEC to match that of hpBMEC; however, α-KG also decreased hiBMEC glycolytic rate. These fundamental metabolic differences between BMEC types may impact <i>in vitro</i> blood-brain barrier model function, particularly communication between BMEC and surrounding cells, and emphasize the importance of evaluating the metabolic impacts of iPSC-derived cells in disease models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"271678X241310729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X241310729","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human primary (hpBMEC) and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived brain microvascular endothelial-like cells (hiBMEC) are interchangeably used in blood-brain barrier models to study neurological diseases and drug delivery. Both hpBMEC and hiBMEC use glutamine as a source of carbon and nitrogen to produce metabolites and build proteins essential to cell function and communication. We used metabolomic, transcriptomic, and computational methods to examine how hpBMEC and hiBMEC metabolize glutamine, which may impact their utility in modeling the blood-brain barrier. We found that glutamine metabolism was systemically different between the two cell types. hpBMEC had a higher metabolic rate and produced more glutamate and GABA, while hiBMEC rerouted glutamine to produce more glutathione, fatty acids, and asparagine. Higher glutathione production in hiBMEC correlated with higher oxidative stress compared to hpBMEC. α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) supplementation increased glutamate secretion from hiBMEC to match that of hpBMEC; however, α-KG also decreased hiBMEC glycolytic rate. These fundamental metabolic differences between BMEC types may impact in vitro blood-brain barrier model function, particularly communication between BMEC and surrounding cells, and emphasize the importance of evaluating the metabolic impacts of iPSC-derived cells in disease models.
期刊介绍:
JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.