Glutamine metabolism is systemically different between primary and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived brain microvascular endothelial cells.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Callie M Weber, Bilal Moiz, Marzyeh Kheradmand, Arielle Scott, Claire Kettula, Brooke Wunderler, Viviana Alpízar Vargas, Alisa Morss Clyne
{"title":"Glutamine metabolism is systemically different between primary and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived brain microvascular endothelial cells.","authors":"Callie M Weber, Bilal Moiz, Marzyeh Kheradmand, Arielle Scott, Claire Kettula, Brooke Wunderler, Viviana Alpízar Vargas, Alisa Morss Clyne","doi":"10.1177/0271678X241310729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human primary (hpBMEC) and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived brain microvascular endothelial-like cells (hiBMEC) are interchangeably used in blood-brain barrier models to study neurological diseases and drug delivery. Both hpBMEC and hiBMEC use glutamine as a source of carbon and nitrogen to produce metabolites and build proteins essential to cell function and communication. We used metabolomic, transcriptomic, and computational methods to examine how hpBMEC and hiBMEC metabolize glutamine, which may impact their utility in modeling the blood-brain barrier. We found that glutamine metabolism was systemically different between the two cell types. hpBMEC had a higher metabolic rate and produced more glutamate and GABA, while hiBMEC rerouted glutamine to produce more glutathione, fatty acids, and asparagine. Higher glutathione production in hiBMEC correlated with higher oxidative stress compared to hpBMEC. α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) supplementation increased glutamate secretion from hiBMEC to match that of hpBMEC; however, α-KG also decreased hiBMEC glycolytic rate. These fundamental metabolic differences between BMEC types may impact <i>in vitro</i> blood-brain barrier model function, particularly communication between BMEC and surrounding cells, and emphasize the importance of evaluating the metabolic impacts of iPSC-derived cells in disease models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"271678X241310729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X241310729","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human primary (hpBMEC) and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived brain microvascular endothelial-like cells (hiBMEC) are interchangeably used in blood-brain barrier models to study neurological diseases and drug delivery. Both hpBMEC and hiBMEC use glutamine as a source of carbon and nitrogen to produce metabolites and build proteins essential to cell function and communication. We used metabolomic, transcriptomic, and computational methods to examine how hpBMEC and hiBMEC metabolize glutamine, which may impact their utility in modeling the blood-brain barrier. We found that glutamine metabolism was systemically different between the two cell types. hpBMEC had a higher metabolic rate and produced more glutamate and GABA, while hiBMEC rerouted glutamine to produce more glutathione, fatty acids, and asparagine. Higher glutathione production in hiBMEC correlated with higher oxidative stress compared to hpBMEC. α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) supplementation increased glutamate secretion from hiBMEC to match that of hpBMEC; however, α-KG also decreased hiBMEC glycolytic rate. These fundamental metabolic differences between BMEC types may impact in vitro blood-brain barrier model function, particularly communication between BMEC and surrounding cells, and emphasize the importance of evaluating the metabolic impacts of iPSC-derived cells in disease models.

谷氨酰胺代谢在原代和诱导多能干细胞衍生的脑微血管内皮细胞之间存在系统性差异。
人原代(hpBMEC)和诱导多能干细胞(iPSC)衍生的脑微血管内皮样细胞(hiBMEC)可互换用于研究神经系统疾病和药物传递的血脑屏障模型。hpBMEC和hiBMEC都使用谷氨酰胺作为碳和氮的来源来产生代谢物和构建细胞功能和通讯所必需的蛋白质。我们使用代谢组学、转录组学和计算方法来研究hpBMEC和hiBMEC如何代谢谷氨酰胺,这可能会影响它们在血脑屏障建模中的效用。我们发现谷氨酰胺代谢在两种细胞类型之间存在系统性差异。hpBMEC具有更高的代谢率,产生更多的谷氨酸和GABA,而hiBMEC改变谷氨酰胺的路线,产生更多的谷胱甘肽、脂肪酸和天冬酰胺。与hpBMEC相比,hiBMEC中较高的谷胱甘肽生成与较高的氧化应激相关。α-酮戊二酸(α-KG)的添加增加了hiBMEC的谷氨酸分泌,与hpBMEC相匹配;α-KG也能降低hiBMEC糖酵解率。BMEC类型之间的这些基本代谢差异可能会影响体外血脑屏障模型功能,特别是BMEC与周围细胞之间的通讯,并强调评估ipsc来源细胞在疾病模型中的代谢影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信