ASTHMAXcel perception: a mobile health application for training in the perception of airflow limitation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Matthew Wysocki, Juliana Rodriguez, Talia Simpson, Bassit Malam, Nicole Maewsky, Aneela Bidiwala, Wenzhu Mowrey, Sunit Jariwala, Marina Reznik, Jonathan M Feldman
{"title":"ASTHMAXcel perception: a mobile health application for training in the perception of airflow limitation.","authors":"Matthew Wysocki, Juliana Rodriguez, Talia Simpson, Bassit Malam, Nicole Maewsky, Aneela Bidiwala, Wenzhu Mowrey, Sunit Jariwala, Marina Reznik, Jonathan M Feldman","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2024.2449232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>ASTHMAXcel Perception is an expansion of prior ASTHMAXcel mobile health applications for children with asthma. ASTHMAXcel Perception was evaluated for its ability to improve asthma control and perception of airflow limitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with asthma ages 15-21 were randomized to receive ASTHMAXcel Perception with peak expiratory flow (PEF) feedback or usual care (UC). A baseline visit was followed by 3 intervention sessions across 6 wk in the intervention group. Assessments in both groups were designed to occur at baseline, 6-week (primary time point), and 3-month follow-up. Self-reported asthma control (primary outcome), asthma quality of life, asthma knowledge, medication adherence, healthcare utilization, app usage, and perception of airflow limitation (measured by comparing self-reported PEF guess to actual PEF) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 patients were enrolled (PEF <i>n</i> = 22, UC <i>n</i> = 23). At 6 wk, the PEF group reported better asthma control than the UC group (18.7 vs 16.7, <i>p</i> < .05). In the PEF group, accurate perception increased from baseline to 6 wk (48% vs 77%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and from baseline to 3 months (48% vs 74%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Over-perception decreased from baseline to 6 wk (26% vs 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.041). The number of logins was associated with greater accuracy in perception of airflow limitation from baseline to 2 wk (<i>r</i> = 0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and 2 wk to 4 wk (<i>r</i> = 0.77, <i>p</i> < .05). No significant differences were found in asthma quality of life, asthma knowledge, medication adherence, or healthcare utilization between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASTHMAXcel Perception improved asthma control and was associated with greater accuracy in perception of airflow limitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2024.2449232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: ASTHMAXcel Perception is an expansion of prior ASTHMAXcel mobile health applications for children with asthma. ASTHMAXcel Perception was evaluated for its ability to improve asthma control and perception of airflow limitation.

Methods: Patients with asthma ages 15-21 were randomized to receive ASTHMAXcel Perception with peak expiratory flow (PEF) feedback or usual care (UC). A baseline visit was followed by 3 intervention sessions across 6 wk in the intervention group. Assessments in both groups were designed to occur at baseline, 6-week (primary time point), and 3-month follow-up. Self-reported asthma control (primary outcome), asthma quality of life, asthma knowledge, medication adherence, healthcare utilization, app usage, and perception of airflow limitation (measured by comparing self-reported PEF guess to actual PEF) were assessed.

Results: 45 patients were enrolled (PEF n = 22, UC n = 23). At 6 wk, the PEF group reported better asthma control than the UC group (18.7 vs 16.7, p < .05). In the PEF group, accurate perception increased from baseline to 6 wk (48% vs 77%, p = 0.01) and from baseline to 3 months (48% vs 74%, p = 0.009). Over-perception decreased from baseline to 6 wk (26% vs 5%, p = 0.041). The number of logins was associated with greater accuracy in perception of airflow limitation from baseline to 2 wk (r = 0.91, p = 0.002) and 2 wk to 4 wk (r = 0.77, p < .05). No significant differences were found in asthma quality of life, asthma knowledge, medication adherence, or healthcare utilization between the two groups.

Conclusion: ASTHMAXcel Perception improved asthma control and was associated with greater accuracy in perception of airflow limitation.

ASTHMAXcel感知:用于气流限制感知训练的移动健康应用程序。
目的:ASTHMAXcel感知是对先前哮喘儿童哮喘病移动健康应用的扩展。评估哮喘maxcel感知改善哮喘控制和感知气流限制的能力。方法:将15 ~ 21岁哮喘患者随机分为两组,分别接受呼气峰流量反馈(PEF)和常规护理(UC)治疗。在基线访问之后,干预组在6周内进行了3次干预。两组的评估均在基线、6周(主要时间点)和3个月随访时进行。评估自我报告的哮喘控制(主要结局)、哮喘生活质量、哮喘知识、药物依从性、医疗保健利用、应用程序使用和气流限制感知(通过比较自我报告的PEF猜测与实际PEF来测量)。结果:纳入45例患者(PEF n = 22, UC n = 23)。6周时,PEF组哮喘控制优于UC组(18.7 vs 16.7, p < 0.05)。在PEF组中,从基线到6周(48%对77%,p = 0.01)和从基线到3个月(48%对74%,p = 0.009),准确感知增加。从基线到6周,过度知觉减少(26% vs 5%, p = 0.041)。从基线到2周(r = 0.91, p = 0.002)和2周到4周(r = 0.77, p < 0.05),登录次数与感知气流限制的更高准确性相关。两组患者在哮喘生活质量、哮喘知识、药物依从性或医疗保健利用方面均无显著差异。结论:ASTHMAXcel感知改善了哮喘控制,并与气流限制感知的准确性相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信