Laennec approach for anatomical liver resection assisted by laparoscopy or robotics: a multicenter cohort study.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Binghua Li, Dalong Yin, Qifan Zhang, Lei Qin, Jianwei Li, Zhixian Hong, Peng Zhu, Guangyu Ding, Zhitian Shi, Changhe Zhang, Kai Zhang, Jin Peng, Yang Yue, Chaobo Chen, Lianxin Liu, Shuguo Zheng, Xiaoping Chen, Qiang Gao, Bixiang Zhang, Decai Yu
{"title":"Laennec approach for anatomical liver resection assisted by laparoscopy or robotics: a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Binghua Li, Dalong Yin, Qifan Zhang, Lei Qin, Jianwei Li, Zhixian Hong, Peng Zhu, Guangyu Ding, Zhitian Shi, Changhe Zhang, Kai Zhang, Jin Peng, Yang Yue, Chaobo Chen, Lianxin Liu, Shuguo Zheng, Xiaoping Chen, Qiang Gao, Bixiang Zhang, Decai Yu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laennec's capsule serves as a critical anatomical landmark in liver resection. Despite its potential, a lack of large-scale prospective studies limits the widespread use of the Laennec approach for minimally invasive hepatectomy. This multicenter cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of the traditional and Laennec approaches in minimally invasive anatomical hepatectomy across multiple centers in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 445 patients from 11 centers were included, with 339 undergoing the Laennec approach and 106 receiving the traditional approach. Intraoperative parameters such as the duration of hepatic pedicle isolation, hepatic vein exposure, parenchymal transection, and liver mobilization were analyzed. Postoperative outcomes, including recurrence-free survival and R0 resection rates, were also assessed. Additionally, a series of subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the Laennec approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Laennec approach demonstrated notable intraoperative advantages, including reduced durations for hepatic pedicle isolation, liver mobilization, hepatic vein exposure, and parenchymal transection. Robotic-assisted procedures, in particular, showed superior outcomes when compared with laparoscopic platform. The Laennec approach proved highly effective across various liver diseases, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, hemangioma, and hepatolithiasis. The Laennec gap, a distinct gap between the liver parenchyma and surrounding vasculature, played a key role in identifying candidates for the Laennec approach. Subgroup analysis revealed that although the Laennec approach provides significant intraoperative benefits, these advantages do not seem not to translate into substantial postoperative improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Laennec approach offers clear intraoperative advantages over the traditional approach when utilizing laparoscopic or robotic systems. These findings support the Laennec approach as a standardized technique for anatomical liver resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1929-1938"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laennec's capsule serves as a critical anatomical landmark in liver resection. Despite its potential, a lack of large-scale prospective studies limits the widespread use of the Laennec approach for minimally invasive hepatectomy. This multicenter cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of the traditional and Laennec approaches in minimally invasive anatomical hepatectomy across multiple centers in China.

Methods: A total of 445 patients from 11 centers were included, with 339 undergoing the Laennec approach and 106 receiving the traditional approach. Intraoperative parameters such as the duration of hepatic pedicle isolation, hepatic vein exposure, parenchymal transection, and liver mobilization were analyzed. Postoperative outcomes, including recurrence-free survival and R0 resection rates, were also assessed. Additionally, a series of subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the Laennec approach.

Results: The Laennec approach demonstrated notable intraoperative advantages, including reduced durations for hepatic pedicle isolation, liver mobilization, hepatic vein exposure, and parenchymal transection. Robotic-assisted procedures, in particular, showed superior outcomes when compared with laparoscopic platform. The Laennec approach proved highly effective across various liver diseases, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, hemangioma, and hepatolithiasis. The Laennec gap, a distinct gap between the liver parenchyma and surrounding vasculature, played a key role in identifying candidates for the Laennec approach. Subgroup analysis revealed that although the Laennec approach provides significant intraoperative benefits, these advantages do not seem not to translate into substantial postoperative improvements.

Conclusions: The Laennec approach offers clear intraoperative advantages over the traditional approach when utilizing laparoscopic or robotic systems. These findings support the Laennec approach as a standardized technique for anatomical liver resection.

Laennec入路在腹腔镜或机器人辅助下进行解剖性肝切除术:一项多中心队列研究。
Laennec包膜是解剖性肝切除术的重要解剖标志。尽管有潜力,但缺乏大规模的前瞻性研究限制了Laennec入路在微创肝切除术中的广泛应用。本多中心队列研究旨在比较中国多个中心的传统和Laennec微创解剖肝切除术的结果。方法:纳入来自11个中心的445例患者,其中339例采用Laennec入路,106例采用传统入路。分析术中参数,如肝蒂分离时间、肝静脉暴露时间、肝实质横断时间和肝脏活动时间。术后结果,包括无复发生存(RFS)和R0切除率,也进行了评估。此外,还进行了一系列亚组分析来评估Laennec方法的疗效。结果:Laennec入路具有明显的术中优势,包括缩短肝蒂分离、肝动员、肝静脉暴露和实质横断的时间。与腹腔镜平台相比,机器人辅助手术尤其表现出更好的结果。Laennec方法被证明对多种肝脏疾病非常有效,特别是肝细胞癌(HCC)、血管瘤和肝内结石。Laennec间隙,肝实质和周围血管之间的明显间隙,在确定Laennec入路候选人中发挥了关键作用。亚组分析显示,尽管Laennec入路提供了显著的术中益处,但这些优势似乎并没有转化为实质性的术后改善。结论:在使用腹腔镜或机器人系统时,Laennec入路比传统入路具有明显的术中优势。这些发现支持Laennec入路作为解剖性肝切除术的标准化技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信