Short-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample of 2005-2018.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cho-Hsing Chung, I-Shen Huang, Wei-Tang Kao
{"title":"Short-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample of 2005-2018.","authors":"Cho-Hsing Chung, I-Shen Huang, Wei-Tang Kao","doi":"10.7150/ijms.102667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse surgical outcomes, and is a risk factor for bladder cancer and subsequent oncological outcomes. This study evaluated outcomes robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC) in patients with DM. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: Data of adults ≥ 18 years old with DM who underwent radical cystectomy were extracted from the United States National Inpatient Sample database 2005-2018. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. <b>Results</b>: Data of 2,765 patients were analyzed. Patients who received RARC had a significantly lower odds of prolonged LOS (adjusted odd ratio (aOR) = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.71), unfavorable discharge (aOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97), urinary complications (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.98) and wound and device-related complications (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.86) than ORC. Of patients < 70 years old, RARC was significantly associated with decreased odds for urinary complications (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.84) and wound and device-related complications (aOR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.94) compared to ORC. In patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 0-1, RARC was associated with a lower risk of urinary complications (aOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.98) and wound and device-related complications (aOR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.93) compared to ORC. <b>Conclusions</b>: In patients with DM and bladder cancer, RARC appears to be associated with better short-term outcomes in terms of reduced risks of prolonged LOS, unfavorable discharge, urinary complications, and wound and device-related complications compared to ORC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 2","pages":"409-416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.102667","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse surgical outcomes, and is a risk factor for bladder cancer and subsequent oncological outcomes. This study evaluated outcomes robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC) in patients with DM. Materials and Methods: Data of adults ≥ 18 years old with DM who underwent radical cystectomy were extracted from the United States National Inpatient Sample database 2005-2018. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. Results: Data of 2,765 patients were analyzed. Patients who received RARC had a significantly lower odds of prolonged LOS (adjusted odd ratio (aOR) = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.71), unfavorable discharge (aOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97), urinary complications (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.98) and wound and device-related complications (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.86) than ORC. Of patients < 70 years old, RARC was significantly associated with decreased odds for urinary complications (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.84) and wound and device-related complications (aOR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.94) compared to ORC. In patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 0-1, RARC was associated with a lower risk of urinary complications (aOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.98) and wound and device-related complications (aOR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.93) compared to ORC. Conclusions: In patients with DM and bladder cancer, RARC appears to be associated with better short-term outcomes in terms of reduced risks of prolonged LOS, unfavorable discharge, urinary complications, and wound and device-related complications compared to ORC.

机器人辅助与开放式根治性膀胱切除术治疗糖尿病患者膀胱癌的短期疗效:2005-2018年美国全国住院患者样本分析
导论:糖尿病(DM)与较差的手术结果相关,是膀胱癌及其后续肿瘤预后的危险因素。本研究评估了机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)与开放式根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)在糖尿病患者中的疗效。材料和方法:从2005-2018年美国国家住院患者样本数据库中提取了接受根治性膀胱切除术的≥18岁糖尿病患者的数据。结果是住院死亡率、住院时间延长(LOS)和术后并发症。结果:共分析2765例患者资料。与ORC相比,接受RARC的患者出现延长的LOS(调整奇数比(aOR) = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.71)、不良出院(aOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97)、泌尿系统并发症(aOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.98)和伤口及器械相关并发症(aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.86)的几率显著降低。在< 70岁的患者中,与ORC相比,RARC与泌尿系统并发症(aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.84)和伤口和器械相关并发症(aOR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.94)的发生率降低显著相关。在Charlson合病指数评分为0-1的患者中,与ORC相比,RARC与泌尿系统并发症(aOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.98)和伤口和器械相关并发症(aOR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.93)的风险较低相关。结论:在糖尿病和膀胱癌患者中,与ORC相比,RARC似乎在降低长期LOS、不良出院、泌尿系统并发症以及伤口和器械相关并发症的风险方面具有更好的短期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信