Plasma effects on bacterial time-kill dynamics: Insights from a PK/PD modelling analysis.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Salma M Bahnasawy, Hifza Ahmed, Markus Zeitlinger, Lena E Friberg, Elisabet I Nielsen
{"title":"Plasma effects on bacterial time-kill dynamics: Insights from a PK/PD modelling analysis.","authors":"Salma M Bahnasawy, Hifza Ahmed, Markus Zeitlinger, Lena E Friberg, Elisabet I Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro time-kill curve (TKC) experiments are an important part of the pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic (PKPD) characterisation of antibiotics. Traditional TKCs use Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB), which lacks specific plasma components that could potentially influence the bacterial growth and killing dynamics, and affect translation to in vivo. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of plasma on the PKPD characterisation of two antibiotics; cefazolin and clindamycin. TKC experiments were conducted in pure MHB, and MHB spiked with 20% and 70% human plasma. Plasma protein binding (PPB) data were available, and a linear model described cefazolin's PPB, while clindamycin's PPB was best described by a second-order polynomial model. PKPD models were developed based on pure MHB and described drug effects using an E<sub>max</sub> model, with consideration of adaptive resistance for cefazolin. The observed bacterial growth and killing in the plasma-spiked MHB TKC data was insufficiently described when applying the developed PPB and PKPD models. In plasma spiked MHB, a growth delay was observed, estimated to 0.25 h (20% plasma), or 2.90 h (70% plasma) for cefazolin, and 0.64 h (20% plasma), or 1.40 h (70% plasma) for clindamycin. Furthermore, the drug effect was higher than expected in plasma-spiked MHB, with bacterial stasis and/or killing at unbound concentrations below MIC, necessitating drug effect parameter scaling (C<sub>50</sub> for cefazolin, Hill coefficient for clindamycin). The findings highlight significant differences in bacterial growth and killing dynamics between pure MHB and plasma-spiked MHB and exemplify how PKPD modelling may be used to improve the translation of in vitro results.</p>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":" ","pages":"107441"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro time-kill curve (TKC) experiments are an important part of the pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic (PKPD) characterisation of antibiotics. Traditional TKCs use Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB), which lacks specific plasma components that could potentially influence the bacterial growth and killing dynamics, and affect translation to in vivo. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of plasma on the PKPD characterisation of two antibiotics; cefazolin and clindamycin. TKC experiments were conducted in pure MHB, and MHB spiked with 20% and 70% human plasma. Plasma protein binding (PPB) data were available, and a linear model described cefazolin's PPB, while clindamycin's PPB was best described by a second-order polynomial model. PKPD models were developed based on pure MHB and described drug effects using an Emax model, with consideration of adaptive resistance for cefazolin. The observed bacterial growth and killing in the plasma-spiked MHB TKC data was insufficiently described when applying the developed PPB and PKPD models. In plasma spiked MHB, a growth delay was observed, estimated to 0.25 h (20% plasma), or 2.90 h (70% plasma) for cefazolin, and 0.64 h (20% plasma), or 1.40 h (70% plasma) for clindamycin. Furthermore, the drug effect was higher than expected in plasma-spiked MHB, with bacterial stasis and/or killing at unbound concentrations below MIC, necessitating drug effect parameter scaling (C50 for cefazolin, Hill coefficient for clindamycin). The findings highlight significant differences in bacterial growth and killing dynamics between pure MHB and plasma-spiked MHB and exemplify how PKPD modelling may be used to improve the translation of in vitro results.

等离子体对细菌时间杀伤动力学的影响从PKPD建模分析的见解。
体外时间杀伤曲线(TKC)实验是抗生素药代动力学-药效学(PKPD)表征的重要组成部分。传统的TKCs使用穆勒-辛顿肉汤(MHB),缺乏可能影响细菌生长和杀伤动力学的特定血浆成分,并影响到体内的转化。本研究旨在评估血浆对两种抗生素PKPD表征的影响;头孢唑林和克林霉素。TKC实验在纯MHB中进行,MHB加入20%和70%的人血浆。血浆蛋白结合(PPB)数据可用,头孢唑林的PPB为线性模型,而克林霉素的PPB为二阶多项式模型。基于纯MHB建立PKPD模型,使用Emax模型描述药物效应,并考虑头孢唑啉的自适应耐药。当应用已开发的PPB和PKPD模型时,在血浆加钉的MHB TKC数据中观察到的细菌生长和杀死没有得到充分的描述。在血浆中添加MHB,观察到生长延迟,头孢唑林估计为0.25小时(20%血浆)或2.90小时(70%血浆),克林霉素为0.64小时(20%血浆)或1.40小时(70%血浆)。此外,血浆加标MHB的药物效应高于预期,在低于MIC的未结合浓度下,细菌停滞和/或死亡,需要对药物效应参数进行缩放(头孢唑林的C50,克林霉素的Hill系数)。这些发现强调了纯MHB和血浆加标MHB在细菌生长和杀伤动力学方面的显著差异,并举例说明了PKPD建模如何用于改善体外结果的翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信