PANORAMA: A 2021 Clinician Survey of Treatment Approaches for People With New Diagnoses of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United Kingdom.

Q1 Nursing
International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2023-079
Nikos Evangelou, Miriam Mattoscio, Mhairi Coutts, Manoharan Andiappan, Teresa Sawtell, Katherine Rhys
{"title":"PANORAMA: A 2021 Clinician Survey of Treatment Approaches for People With New Diagnoses of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Nikos Evangelou, Miriam Mattoscio, Mhairi Coutts, Manoharan Andiappan, Teresa Sawtell, Katherine Rhys","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2023-079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The PANORAMA survey aimed to assess current treatment practice for individuals with new diagnoses of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the United Kingdom and to explore variations in treatment approaches with an emphasis on escalation vs early high-efficacy treatment (HET) and treatment goals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health care professionals (HCPs) from the UK treating patients with RRMS took part in interviews facilitated by a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively using quantitative or qualitative methods, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight HCPs from 38 UK centers took part in the survey, including 20 MS consultants and 13 MS specialist nurses. Seventy-four percent (n = 28 of 38) of HCPs strongly agreed and 24% (9 of 38) agreed that early treatment is essential for better outcomes. HCPs reported that they currently treat a mean (SD) of 58.3% (20.8%) and 42.1% (21.8%) of patients with new diagnoses of RRMS with early HET or escalation approaches, respectively. Thirty-four percent (13 of 38) of HCPs reported a discrepancy between current treatment approach and the approach they would like to take, which would be 66.2% favoring early HET and 33.8% favoring escalation approaches. The factors influencing the choice of treatment approach were overall patient health profile (45%, 17 of 38) and patient choice (39%, 15 of 38). The most important treatment goals were to reduce relapses (63%, 24 of 38), delay disability progression (58%, 22 of 38), and maintain quality of life (50%, 19 of 38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survey highlights variation among HCPs in the UK in current vs ideal use of escalation or early HET approaches and factors influencing choice of treatment approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"27 Q1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2023-079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The PANORAMA survey aimed to assess current treatment practice for individuals with new diagnoses of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the United Kingdom and to explore variations in treatment approaches with an emphasis on escalation vs early high-efficacy treatment (HET) and treatment goals.

Methods: Health care professionals (HCPs) from the UK treating patients with RRMS took part in interviews facilitated by a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively using quantitative or qualitative methods, as appropriate.

Results: Thirty-eight HCPs from 38 UK centers took part in the survey, including 20 MS consultants and 13 MS specialist nurses. Seventy-four percent (n = 28 of 38) of HCPs strongly agreed and 24% (9 of 38) agreed that early treatment is essential for better outcomes. HCPs reported that they currently treat a mean (SD) of 58.3% (20.8%) and 42.1% (21.8%) of patients with new diagnoses of RRMS with early HET or escalation approaches, respectively. Thirty-four percent (13 of 38) of HCPs reported a discrepancy between current treatment approach and the approach they would like to take, which would be 66.2% favoring early HET and 33.8% favoring escalation approaches. The factors influencing the choice of treatment approach were overall patient health profile (45%, 17 of 38) and patient choice (39%, 15 of 38). The most important treatment goals were to reduce relapses (63%, 24 of 38), delay disability progression (58%, 22 of 38), and maintain quality of life (50%, 19 of 38).

Conclusions: The survey highlights variation among HCPs in the UK in current vs ideal use of escalation or early HET approaches and factors influencing choice of treatment approach.

PANORAMA: 2021年英国复发-缓解型多发性硬化症新诊断患者治疗方法临床医生调查
背景:PANORAMA调查旨在评估英国新诊断的复发-缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者的当前治疗实践,并探讨治疗方法的变化,重点是升级治疗与早期高效治疗(HET)和治疗目标。方法:来自英国的治疗RRMS患者的卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)通过结构化问卷进行访谈。酌情使用定量或定性方法对数据进行描述性分析。结果:来自英国38个中心的38名HCPs参与了调查,其中包括20名MS顾问和13名MS专科护士。74%(38人中有28人)的HCPs强烈同意,24%(38人中有9人)同意早期治疗对于获得更好的结果至关重要。HCPs报告说,他们目前分别治疗58.3%(20.8%)和42.1%(21.8%)的新诊断RRMS患者采用早期HET或升级方法。34%(38人中有13人)的HCPs报告了当前治疗方法与他们希望采取的方法之间的差异,其中66.2%的人倾向于早期HET, 33.8%的人倾向于升级方法。影响治疗方法选择的因素是患者总体健康状况(45%,38人中有17人)和患者选择(39%,38人中有15人)。最重要的治疗目标是减少复发(63%,38人中的24人),延缓残疾进展(58%,38人中的22人),维持生活质量(50%,38人中的19人)。结论:该调查强调了英国HCPs在当前与理想使用升级或早期HET方法的差异以及影响治疗方法选择的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信