The Predictive Significance of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Xiaoyi Wang, Yanfang Zhao, Yangyang Fan, Yun Liu
{"title":"The Predictive Significance of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Xiaoyi Wang,&nbsp;Yanfang Zhao,&nbsp;Yangyang Fan,&nbsp;Yun Liu","doi":"10.1002/iid3.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy, and its underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms remains unclear. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), a prothrombotic and inflammatory marker, has been controversially discussed as a potential predictor of miscarriage. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the predictive significance of the PLR in women with miscarriage compared to healthy pregnancies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciencey, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Articles were identified, screened, and evaluated for quality to determine the predictive value of PLR for miscarriage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen eligible articles, comprising a total of 3745 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis found comparable PLR levels between miscarriage and non-miscarriage groups (SMD = 0.25; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −0.05 to 0.54). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in PLR levels in the missed miscarriage group (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.01–0.56). and in studies with sample sizes smaller than 200 (SMD = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.05–0.56). Other subgroups did not exhibit significant differences. Subgroup analysis of PLR levels and miscarriage risk demonstrated no significant differences across all subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PLR is not a reliable predictor of miscarriage in general. However, for missed miscarriage cases, elevated PLR levels may serve as a practical and cost-effective marker for prediction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13289,"journal":{"name":"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy, and its underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms remains unclear. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), a prothrombotic and inflammatory marker, has been controversially discussed as a potential predictor of miscarriage. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the predictive significance of the PLR in women with miscarriage compared to healthy pregnancies.

Material and Methods

Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciencey, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Articles were identified, screened, and evaluated for quality to determine the predictive value of PLR for miscarriage.

Results

Fourteen eligible articles, comprising a total of 3745 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis found comparable PLR levels between miscarriage and non-miscarriage groups (SMD = 0.25; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −0.05 to 0.54). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in PLR levels in the missed miscarriage group (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.01–0.56). and in studies with sample sizes smaller than 200 (SMD = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.05–0.56). Other subgroups did not exhibit significant differences. Subgroup analysis of PLR levels and miscarriage risk demonstrated no significant differences across all subgroups.

Conclusion

PLR is not a reliable predictor of miscarriage in general. However, for missed miscarriage cases, elevated PLR levels may serve as a practical and cost-effective marker for prediction.

Abstract Image

血小板与淋巴细胞比值对流产的预测意义:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:流产是妊娠的常见并发症,其潜在的病理生理机制尚不清楚。血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)是一种血栓形成和炎症标志物,作为流产的潜在预测指标一直存在争议。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估与健康妊娠相比,PLR在流产妇女中的预测意义。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library,截止2023年12月31日的相关研究。遵循PRISMA指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。对文章进行鉴定、筛选和质量评估,以确定PLR对流产的预测价值。结果:14篇符合条件的文章,共包括3745名患者,被纳入meta分析。合并分析发现,流产组和非流产组的PLR水平相当(SMD = 0.25;95%置信区间(CI): -0.05 ~ 0.54)。亚组分析显示,漏流产组PLR水平差异有统计学意义(SMD = 0.29;95% ci: 0.01-0.56)。在样本量小于200的研究中(SMD = 0.31;95% ci: 0.05-0.56)。其他亚组无显著差异。亚组分析显示,所有亚组间PLR水平和流产风险无显著差异。结论:一般来说,PLR不是流产的可靠预测指标。然而,对于遗漏的流产病例,升高的PLR水平可以作为一种实用的、具有成本效益的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Immunity, Inflammation and Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research across the broad field of immunology. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease gives rapid consideration to papers in all areas of clinical and basic research. The journal is indexed in Medline and the Science Citation Index Expanded (part of Web of Science), among others. It welcomes original work that enhances the understanding of immunology in areas including: • cellular and molecular immunology • clinical immunology • allergy • immunochemistry • immunogenetics • immune signalling • immune development • imaging • mathematical modelling • autoimmunity • transplantation immunology • cancer immunology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信