Efficacy and Safety of Specific Immunotherapy Combined with Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Dayu Guan, Yijun Liu, Yue Gu, Bowen Zheng, Rong Sun, Yang Shen, Yucheng Yang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Specific Immunotherapy Combined with Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dayu Guan, Yijun Liu, Yue Gu, Bowen Zheng, Rong Sun, Yang Shen, Yucheng Yang","doi":"10.1159/000543023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Allergic diseases are common clinical diseases. Although allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) and biologics have been widely recognized, the clinical efficacy, safety, advantages and disadvantages of the combined application have not yet been sufficiently recognized. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of AIT combined with biologics in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify RCTs investigating AIT combined with biologics for treating allergic rhinitis and asthma. The relevant outcome indicators, including incidences of emergency drugs use, severe nasal symptoms, severe adverse effects (AEs), local reactions at the site of administration, headache, and general AEs, were collected and extracted. Routine and network meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan-5.4 and STATA-MP-14 to assess efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs and a retrospective study involving 1494 patients aged 5 to 65 years with allergic rhinitis and asthma were included in this review. ① Routine meta-analysis revealed that AIT combined with biologics was significantly better than control treatment (placebo, AIT or biologics) in terms of the incidence of emergency drugs use, severe nasal symptoms, and severe AEs (P=0.0002; P=0.01; P=0.02). However, the differences in the incidence of local reactions at the site of administration, headache and general AEs were not significant. ② In the network meta-analysis, compared with AIT or placebo alone, AIT combined with biologics observably reduced the incidence of emergency drugs use and severe nasal symptoms (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.73; OR=0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.63). Furthermore, AIT combined with biologics yielded an evidently lower incidence of serious adverse reactions than AIT alone (OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined application of AIT and biologics has promising prospects in the clinical treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma due to the improvement of both clinical efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION (PROSPERO #CRD42024496277).</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Allergic diseases are common clinical diseases. Although allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) and biologics have been widely recognized, the clinical efficacy, safety, advantages and disadvantages of the combined application have not yet been sufficiently recognized. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of AIT combined with biologics in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify RCTs investigating AIT combined with biologics for treating allergic rhinitis and asthma. The relevant outcome indicators, including incidences of emergency drugs use, severe nasal symptoms, severe adverse effects (AEs), local reactions at the site of administration, headache, and general AEs, were collected and extracted. Routine and network meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan-5.4 and STATA-MP-14 to assess efficacy and safety.

Results: Eight RCTs and a retrospective study involving 1494 patients aged 5 to 65 years with allergic rhinitis and asthma were included in this review. ① Routine meta-analysis revealed that AIT combined with biologics was significantly better than control treatment (placebo, AIT or biologics) in terms of the incidence of emergency drugs use, severe nasal symptoms, and severe AEs (P=0.0002; P=0.01; P=0.02). However, the differences in the incidence of local reactions at the site of administration, headache and general AEs were not significant. ② In the network meta-analysis, compared with AIT or placebo alone, AIT combined with biologics observably reduced the incidence of emergency drugs use and severe nasal symptoms (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.73; OR=0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.63). Furthermore, AIT combined with biologics yielded an evidently lower incidence of serious adverse reactions than AIT alone (OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.74).

Conclusion: The combined application of AIT and biologics has promising prospects in the clinical treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma due to the improvement of both clinical efficacy and safety.

Trial registration: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION (PROSPERO #CRD42024496277).

特异性免疫治疗联合生物制剂治疗变应性鼻炎和哮喘的疗效和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
变态反应性疾病是临床上常见的疾病。虽然过敏原特异性免疫疗法(AIT)和生物制剂已经得到了广泛的认可,但它们联合应用的临床疗效、安全性、优缺点尚未得到充分的认识。我们的目的是探讨AIT联合生物制剂治疗变应性鼻炎和哮喘患者的疗效和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和Web of Science,以确定研究AIT联合生物制剂治疗变应性鼻炎和哮喘的随机对照试验。收集并提取相关结局指标,包括急诊用药发生率、严重鼻症状发生率、严重不良反应发生率、给药部位局部反应发生率、头痛发生率和一般不良反应发生率。采用RevMan-5.4和STATA-MP-14进行常规和网络meta分析,评估疗效和安全性。结果:本综述纳入了8项随机对照试验和1项回顾性研究,涉及1494例5 ~ 65岁变应性鼻炎和哮喘患者。①常规荟萃分析显示,AIT联合生物制剂在急诊用药、严重鼻症状和严重不良反应发生率方面显著优于对照组(安慰剂、AIT或生物制剂)(P=0.0002;P = 0.01;P = 0.02)。然而,给药部位局部反应、头痛和一般不良反应的发生率差异无统计学意义。②在网络荟萃分析中,与AIT或安慰剂单独比较,AIT联合生物制剂显著降低了急诊用药和严重鼻症状的发生率(or =0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.73;Or =0.41, 95% ci 0.26-0.63)。此外,AIT联合生物制剂的严重不良反应发生率明显低于单独使用AIT (OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.74)。结论:AIT与生物制剂联合应用在变应性鼻炎和哮喘的临床治疗中,临床疗效和安全性均有提高,具有广阔的应用前景。试验注册:系统评价注册(PROSPERO #CRD42024496277)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信