Acute hypoalgesic and neurophysiological responses to lower-limb ischaemic preconditioning.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Ryan Norbury, Ian Grant, Alex Woodhead, Stephen D Patterson
{"title":"Acute hypoalgesic and neurophysiological responses to lower-limb ischaemic preconditioning.","authors":"Ryan Norbury, Ian Grant, Alex Woodhead, Stephen D Patterson","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06985-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess if ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) can reduce pain perception and enhance corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions. In a randomised, within-subject design, healthy participants took part in three experimental visits after a familiarisation session. Measures of pressure pain threshold (PPT), maximum voluntary isometric force, voluntary activation, resting twitch force, corticospinal excitability and corticospinal inhibition were performed before and ≥10 min after either, unilateral IPC on the right leg (3 × 5 min); a sham protocol (3 × 1 min); or a control (no occlusion). Pain perception was then assessed in response to a hypertonic saline injection into the vastus lateralis muscle. In the right (occluded) leg, PPT was 10% greater after IPC compared to sham (P = 0.004). PPTs were also 9.5% greater in the contralateral leg for IPC compared to sham (P = 0.031). Maximum voluntary force, voluntary activation and resting twitch force were not different between conditions (all P ≥ 0.133). Measures of corticospinal excitability and inhibition also revealed no significant differences between conditions (all P ≥ 0.240). Hypertonic saline evoked pain revealed no difference in reported intensity or duration between conditions (P ≥ 0.082). IPC can reduce pain sensitivity in local and remote areas but does not subsequently impact neurophysiological measures of excitability or inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06985-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess if ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) can reduce pain perception and enhance corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions. In a randomised, within-subject design, healthy participants took part in three experimental visits after a familiarisation session. Measures of pressure pain threshold (PPT), maximum voluntary isometric force, voluntary activation, resting twitch force, corticospinal excitability and corticospinal inhibition were performed before and ≥10 min after either, unilateral IPC on the right leg (3 × 5 min); a sham protocol (3 × 1 min); or a control (no occlusion). Pain perception was then assessed in response to a hypertonic saline injection into the vastus lateralis muscle. In the right (occluded) leg, PPT was 10% greater after IPC compared to sham (P = 0.004). PPTs were also 9.5% greater in the contralateral leg for IPC compared to sham (P = 0.031). Maximum voluntary force, voluntary activation and resting twitch force were not different between conditions (all P ≥ 0.133). Measures of corticospinal excitability and inhibition also revealed no significant differences between conditions (all P ≥ 0.240). Hypertonic saline evoked pain revealed no difference in reported intensity or duration between conditions (P ≥ 0.082). IPC can reduce pain sensitivity in local and remote areas but does not subsequently impact neurophysiological measures of excitability or inhibition.

下肢缺血预处理的急性镇痛和神经生理反应。
本研究的目的是评估缺血预处理(IPC)是否可以减少痛觉并增强自愿收缩时的皮质脊髓兴奋性。在随机的受试者设计中,健康的参与者在熟悉会议后参加了三次实验访问。测量压力痛阈值(PPT)、最大自主等距力、自主激活、静息抽搐力、皮质脊髓兴奋性和皮质脊髓抑制,分别在右腿单侧IPC (3 × 5 min)之前和之后≥10 min进行测量;假协议(3 × 1 min);或者一个控制(没有遮挡)。然后评估对股外侧肌注射高渗生理盐水的反应。在右腿(闭塞),IPC后的PPT比假手术高10% (P = 0.004)。与假手术相比,IPC对侧腿的PPTs也高出9.5% (P = 0.031)。两组最大自主力、自主激活力和静息抽搐力无显著差异(P均≥0.133)。皮质脊髓兴奋性和抑制性的测量也显示两组间无显著差异(P均≥0.240)。高渗盐水引起的疼痛在两种情况下报告的强度和持续时间没有差异(P≥0.082)。IPC可以降低局部和远处区域的疼痛敏感性,但随后不会影响兴奋性或抑制性的神经生理测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信