Heterogeneity in Category Recognition across the Visual Field.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-01-27 Print Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0331-24.2024
Farideh Shakerian, Roxana Kushki, Maryam Vaziri Pashkam, Mohammad-Reza A Dehaqani, Hossein Esteky
{"title":"Heterogeneity in Category Recognition across the Visual Field.","authors":"Farideh Shakerian, Roxana Kushki, Maryam Vaziri Pashkam, Mohammad-Reza A Dehaqani, Hossein Esteky","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0331-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual information emerging from the extrafoveal locations is important for visual search, saccadic eye movement control, and spatial attention allocation. Our everyday sensory experience with visual object categories varies across different parts of the visual field which may result in location-contingent variations in visual object recognition. We used a body, animal body, and chair two-forced choice object category recognition task to investigate this possibility. Animal body and chair images with various levels of visual ambiguity were presented at the fovea and different extrafoveal locations across the vertical and horizontal meridians. We found heterogeneous body and chair category recognition across the visual field. Specifically, while the recognition performance of the body and chair presented at the fovea were similar, it varied across different extrafoveal locations. The largest difference was observed when the body and chair images were presented at the lower-left and upper-right visual fields, respectively. The lower/upper visual field bias of the body/chair recognition was particularly observed in low/high stimulus visual signals. Finally, when subjects' performances were adjusted for a potential location-contingent decision bias in category recognition by subtracting the category detection in full noise condition, location-dependent category recognition was observed only for the body category. These results suggest heterogeneous body recognition bias across the visual field potentially due to more frequent exposure of the lower visual field to body stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0331-24.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual information emerging from the extrafoveal locations is important for visual search, saccadic eye movement control, and spatial attention allocation. Our everyday sensory experience with visual object categories varies across different parts of the visual field which may result in location-contingent variations in visual object recognition. We used a body, animal body, and chair two-forced choice object category recognition task to investigate this possibility. Animal body and chair images with various levels of visual ambiguity were presented at the fovea and different extrafoveal locations across the vertical and horizontal meridians. We found heterogeneous body and chair category recognition across the visual field. Specifically, while the recognition performance of the body and chair presented at the fovea were similar, it varied across different extrafoveal locations. The largest difference was observed when the body and chair images were presented at the lower-left and upper-right visual fields, respectively. The lower/upper visual field bias of the body/chair recognition was particularly observed in low/high stimulus visual signals. Finally, when subjects' performances were adjusted for a potential location-contingent decision bias in category recognition by subtracting the category detection in full noise condition, location-dependent category recognition was observed only for the body category. These results suggest heterogeneous body recognition bias across the visual field potentially due to more frequent exposure of the lower visual field to body stimuli.

跨视野类别识别的异质性。
从中央凹外位置产生的视觉信息对于视觉搜索、眼动控制和空间注意力分配是重要的。我们对视觉对象类别的日常感官体验在视野的不同部分是不同的,这可能导致视觉对象识别的位置变化。我们使用身体、动物身体和椅子两种强制选择对象类别识别任务来研究这种可能性。在垂直和水平子午线的中央窝和不同的中央窝外位置呈现不同程度的视觉模糊的动物身体和椅子图像。我们发现在整个视野中,身体和椅子类别的识别是异质的。具体来说,虽然在中央凹处呈现的身体和椅子的识别性能相似,但在不同的中央凹外位置则有所不同。当身体和椅子图像分别出现在左下方和右上方的视野时,观察到的差异最大。在低/高刺激视觉信号中,身体/椅子识别的上下视野偏差尤为明显。最后,在排除全噪声条件下的类别检测,调整被试的行为以排除类别识别中可能存在的位置偶然决策偏差时,只观察到身体类别的位置依赖类别识别。这些结果表明,跨视野的异质身体识别偏差可能是由于更频繁地暴露于下视野的身体刺激。我们的研究表明,视觉物体识别在不同的视野区域表现出显著的差异,在识别下视野区域的身体图像方面存在明显的偏见。这种识别性能的异质性表明,经常将某些视野区域暴露于特定对象类别(如身体)会影响我们的视觉处理能力。这些发现强调了在理解视觉物体识别中考虑空间注意力和眼球跳动的重要性,并对设计更有效的视觉信息显示和界面具有潜在的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信