The Overlap between Type 1 Diabetes and Celiac Disease in Children and the Role of Tissue Transglutaminase-IgA Positivity in Endoscopy Decision.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Elif Eviz, Sinan Sari, Nuray Uslu Kizilkan, Esra Doger, Gul Yesiltepe Mutlu, Ödül Eğritaş, Cigdem Arikan, Aysun Bideci, Buket Dalgic, Sukru Hatun
{"title":"The Overlap between Type 1 Diabetes and Celiac Disease in Children and the Role of Tissue Transglutaminase-IgA Positivity in Endoscopy Decision.","authors":"Elif Eviz, Sinan Sari, Nuray Uslu Kizilkan, Esra Doger, Gul Yesiltepe Mutlu, Ödül Eğritaş, Cigdem Arikan, Aysun Bideci, Buket Dalgic, Sukru Hatun","doi":"10.1159/000543168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Celiac disease (CD)-related antibody positivity in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) may fluctuate and become negative spontaneously. There are uncertainties about the optimal tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) titre and timing of endoscopy in the diagnosis of CD, and this study aimed to contribute to the debate on the tTG-IgA threshold titre for endoscopy decisions in children with T1D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 991 children with T1D who had undergone serologic evaluation for CD were analysed retrospectively. The tTG-IgA positivity rate and the upper limit of normal (ULN) tTG-IgA positivity were assessed. Participants were grouped according to the frequency, course, and test results of tTG-IgA tests. Those with and without histopathologic diagnosis of CD by endoscopic biopsy were compared in terms of tTG-IgA screening time and tTG-IgA predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 10.2% (n:101) of all cases, tTG-IgA antibody was positive and endoscopic biopsy was performed in 68.3% (n:69) of these cases. Of all cases, 4.3% (n:43) were diagnosed with CD by endoscopic biopsy. A tTG-IgA titre of 7×ULN and above was found to be the best predictive value for the diagnosis of CD with 79.1% sensitivity, 80.8% specificity 87.2% positive predictive value, and 70% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 10% of antibody positive cases showed fluctuating and low-titre positivity, and no CD was detected by endoscopic biopsy in the group with fluctuating antibody course. The results of our study suggest that endoscopy in children with tTG-IgA levels 7×ULN or above may prevent both false-positive results and missed cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Celiac disease (CD)-related antibody positivity in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) may fluctuate and become negative spontaneously. There are uncertainties about the optimal tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) titre and timing of endoscopy in the diagnosis of CD, and this study aimed to contribute to the debate on the tTG-IgA threshold titre for endoscopy decisions in children with T1D.

Methods: The data of 991 children with T1D who had undergone serologic evaluation for CD were analysed retrospectively. The tTG-IgA positivity rate and the upper limit of normal (ULN) tTG-IgA positivity were assessed. Participants were grouped according to the frequency, course, and test results of tTG-IgA tests. Those with and without histopathologic diagnosis of CD by endoscopic biopsy were compared in terms of tTG-IgA screening time and tTG-IgA predictive values.

Results: In 10.2% (n:101) of all cases, tTG-IgA antibody was positive and endoscopic biopsy was performed in 68.3% (n:69) of these cases. Of all cases, 4.3% (n:43) were diagnosed with CD by endoscopic biopsy. A tTG-IgA titre of 7×ULN and above was found to be the best predictive value for the diagnosis of CD with 79.1% sensitivity, 80.8% specificity 87.2% positive predictive value, and 70% negative predictive value.

Conclusions: Approximately 10% of antibody positive cases showed fluctuating and low-titre positivity, and no CD was detected by endoscopic biopsy in the group with fluctuating antibody course. The results of our study suggest that endoscopy in children with tTG-IgA levels 7×ULN or above may prevent both false-positive results and missed cases.

儿童1型糖尿病和乳糜泻的重叠及tTG-IgA阳性在内镜检查决策中的作用
1型糖尿病(T1D)患儿乳糜泻(CD)相关抗体阳性可能波动并自发变为阴性。在CD诊断中,tTG-IgA的最佳滴度和内镜检查的时机尚不确定,本研究旨在为T1D儿童内镜检查决策中tTGA-IgA阈值滴度的争论做出贡献。方法:回顾性分析991例T1D患儿行CD血清学检查的资料。评估tTG-IgA阳性率及正常(ULN) tTG-IgA阳性上限。根据tTG-IgA检测的频次、病程和检测结果进行分组。比较经内镜活检诊断为CD的患者和未诊断为CD的患者的tTG-IgA筛查时间和tTG-IgA预测值。结果:10.2%(101例)的病例tTG-IgA抗体阳性,68.3%(69例)的病例行内镜活检。在所有病例中,4.3% (n:43)通过内镜活检诊断为CD。tTG-IgA滴度为7xULN及以上为诊断CD的最佳预测值,敏感性79.1%,特异性80.8%,阳性预测值87.2%,阴性预测值70%。结论:约10%的抗体阳性病例呈波动和低滴度阳性,抗体波动组的内镜活检未检出CD。我们的研究结果表明,tTG-IgA水平为7xULN或以上的儿童进行内窥镜检查可以预防假阳性结果和漏诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信