The utility of brief instruments for depression screening in dialysis patients.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae369
Isabel Vázquez, Adolfo Figueiras, Ángel Salgado-Barreira
{"title":"The utility of brief instruments for depression screening in dialysis patients.","authors":"Isabel Vázquez, Adolfo Figueiras, Ángel Salgado-Barreira","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is a frequent but often underdiagnosed comorbid disorder in dialysis patients. The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) is a reliable and valid instrument for depression screening but is relatively long for repeated use in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare the BDI-II with the shorter questionnaires Beck Depression Inventory-FastScreen (BDI-FS), the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS-D), the Mental Health (MH) scale of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and two items of the MH ('So down in the dumps that nothing could cheer you up' and 'Downhearted and blue') to determine the most efficient instruments for screening depressive symptoms in dialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted involving patients from 14 health centres undergoing in-centre haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. All patients completed the BDI-II, HADS-D and MH scale. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for each brief instrument were assessed relative to BDI-II ≥16.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 145 patients included in the study (mean age 62 years; 66% male), 24.8% had depressive symptoms (BDI ≥16). The cut-off points with the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value for BDI-FS were ≥3 (91.7% and 96.1%, respectively) and ≥4 (80.6% and 92.4%, respectively) and for the HADS-D these were ≥4 (91.7% and 95.8%, respectively) and ≥5 (83.3% and 92.6%, respectively). The cut-off points for the total MH and the two items (considered separately or together) resulted in lower sensitivity (<80%) and lower negative predictive values (<90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the BDI-FS and HADS-D are adequate screening tools for depression in the dialysis population. As the BDI-FS is easier to complete and score and enables identification of patients at risk of suicide, it may be the best alternative to the BDI-II for depression screening in dialysis patients in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"sfae369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression is a frequent but often underdiagnosed comorbid disorder in dialysis patients. The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) is a reliable and valid instrument for depression screening but is relatively long for repeated use in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare the BDI-II with the shorter questionnaires Beck Depression Inventory-FastScreen (BDI-FS), the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS-D), the Mental Health (MH) scale of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and two items of the MH ('So down in the dumps that nothing could cheer you up' and 'Downhearted and blue') to determine the most efficient instruments for screening depressive symptoms in dialysis patients.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving patients from 14 health centres undergoing in-centre haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. All patients completed the BDI-II, HADS-D and MH scale. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for each brief instrument were assessed relative to BDI-II ≥16.

Results: Of the 145 patients included in the study (mean age 62 years; 66% male), 24.8% had depressive symptoms (BDI ≥16). The cut-off points with the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value for BDI-FS were ≥3 (91.7% and 96.1%, respectively) and ≥4 (80.6% and 92.4%, respectively) and for the HADS-D these were ≥4 (91.7% and 95.8%, respectively) and ≥5 (83.3% and 92.6%, respectively). The cut-off points for the total MH and the two items (considered separately or together) resulted in lower sensitivity (<80%) and lower negative predictive values (<90%).

Conclusions: Both the BDI-FS and HADS-D are adequate screening tools for depression in the dialysis population. As the BDI-FS is easier to complete and score and enables identification of patients at risk of suicide, it may be the best alternative to the BDI-II for depression screening in dialysis patients in clinical settings.

简易仪器在透析患者抑郁筛查中的应用。
背景:抑郁症是透析患者中一种常见但常被误诊的合并症。贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)是一种可靠有效的抑郁症筛查工具,但在临床实践中重复使用的时间相对较长。本研究的目的是比较BDI-II与较短的问卷贝克抑郁量表-快速筛选(BDI-FS),医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS-D)的抑郁子量表,36项简短健康调查(SF-36)的心理健康(MH)量表和MH中的两个项目(“如此沮丧,没有什么能让你高兴起来”和“沮丧和忧郁”),以确定筛选透析患者抑郁症状的最有效工具。方法:一项横断面研究涉及来自14个保健中心的接受中心内血液透析或腹膜透析的患者。所有患者均完成BDI-II、HADS-D和MH量表。相对于BDI-II≥16,评估每种简短工具的敏感性、特异性和阳性、阴性预测值。结果:纳入研究的145例患者(平均年龄62岁;66%男性),24.8%有抑郁症状(BDI≥16)。BDI-FS的最高敏感性和阴性预测值分界点分别为≥3(分别为91.7%和96.1%)和≥4(分别为80.6%和92.4%),HADS-D的最高敏感性分界点分别为≥4(分别为91.7%和95.8%)和≥5(分别为83.3%和92.6%)。总MH和这两个项目(单独或一起考虑)的分界点导致敏感性较低(结论:BDI-FS和HADS-D都是透析人群中抑郁症的足够筛查工具)。由于BDI-FS更容易完成和评分,并且能够识别有自杀风险的患者,因此它可能是临床透析患者抑郁症筛查中BDI-II的最佳替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信