Catherine R Belanger, J Scott Weese, Maureen E C Anderson, Kelsey L Spence, Katie M Clow
{"title":"A cross-sectional survey examining Canadian veterinarians' experiences with and perceptions of canine importation.","authors":"Catherine R Belanger, J Scott Weese, Maureen E C Anderson, Kelsey L Spence, Katie M Clow","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As numbers of dogs entering Canada from abroad are increasing, it is essential to understand the scope, challenges, and risks associated with canine importation. Canadian veterinarians' collective experience with and clinical knowledge of imported dogs can provide valuable insights into this practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe Canadian veterinarians' experiences with, and perspectives of, imported dogs in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Procedure: </strong>An anonymous, online survey was circulated to Canadian veterinarians, <i>via</i> national and provincial veterinary associations, from April to June 2021. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, univariable logistic regression, and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 524 responses were included. Veterinarians reported imported dogs mainly originating from the United States (89%) and imported <i>via</i> rescue organizations (92%). Few reported imported dogs arriving with core vaccines or parasiticides administered. Despite infectious disease concerns, only 14% routinely implemented enhanced infection-control practices with imported dogs in clinics. Resources outlining country-specific disease risks, foreign disease screening, and client education were deemed highly valuable for supporting clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical relevance: </strong>Canadian veterinarians' experiences reinforced gaps in the healthcare of imported dogs, highlighted inconsistencies in clinical management of these dogs, and identified areas in which educational resources could improve animal health and the practice of importing dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9429,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne","volume":"66 1","pages":"86-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: As numbers of dogs entering Canada from abroad are increasing, it is essential to understand the scope, challenges, and risks associated with canine importation. Canadian veterinarians' collective experience with and clinical knowledge of imported dogs can provide valuable insights into this practice.
Objective: To describe Canadian veterinarians' experiences with, and perspectives of, imported dogs in clinical practice.
Procedure: An anonymous, online survey was circulated to Canadian veterinarians, via national and provincial veterinary associations, from April to June 2021. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, univariable logistic regression, and content analysis.
Results: A total of 524 responses were included. Veterinarians reported imported dogs mainly originating from the United States (89%) and imported via rescue organizations (92%). Few reported imported dogs arriving with core vaccines or parasiticides administered. Despite infectious disease concerns, only 14% routinely implemented enhanced infection-control practices with imported dogs in clinics. Resources outlining country-specific disease risks, foreign disease screening, and client education were deemed highly valuable for supporting clinical practice.
Conclusion and clinical relevance: Canadian veterinarians' experiences reinforced gaps in the healthcare of imported dogs, highlighted inconsistencies in clinical management of these dogs, and identified areas in which educational resources could improve animal health and the practice of importing dogs.
期刊介绍：
The Canadian Veterinary Journal (CVJ) provides a forum for the discussion of all matters relevant to the veterinary profession. The mission of the Journal is to educate by informing readers of progress in clinical veterinary medicine, clinical veterinary research, and related fields of endeavor. The key objective of The CVJ is to promote the art and science of veterinary medicine and the betterment of animal health.
A report suggesting that animals have been unnecessarily subjected to adverse, stressful, or harsh conditions or treatments will not be processed for publication. Experimental studies using animals will only be considered for publication if the studies have been approved by an institutional animal care committee, or equivalent, and the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, or equivalent, have been followed by the author(s).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
