Trigeminal neuralgia improvement following Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yazan AlHabil, Khulood Al-Sayed, Ashraf Salameh
{"title":"Trigeminal neuralgia improvement following Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yazan AlHabil, Khulood Al-Sayed, Ashraf Salameh","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-04014-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a prevalent and debilitating craniofacial pain disorder characterized by severe, unilateral, shock-like pain. Standard treatments include anti-epileptic drugs and surgical interventions, but many patients experience limited relief or adverse effects. Non-invasive therapies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), have emerged as alternative options. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TENS in managing primary trigeminal neuralgia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted, yielding 89 papers. Following selection criteria, five clinical trials involving 101 patients with primary TN and TENS treatment were included. Data on pain severity, TENS parameters, and outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan software, with outcomes assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores before and after TENS treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-treatment VAS scores averaged 8.75 ± 0.18, indicating severe pain. Post-treatment, the mean VAS score significantly decreased to 1.17 ± 0.55, demonstrating substantial pain relief. The meta-analysis revealed a mean difference of 7.49 (95% CI: 7.05 to 7.93) in VAS scores, with a p-value < 0.05, indicating statistically significant pain reduction. Heterogeneity among studies was moderate (I<sup>2</sup> = 57%). Complications were infrequently reported, with one study noting paresthesia in a small number of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TENS appears to be an effective and safe intervention for reducing pain in patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia. Despite variability in treatment protocols and follow-up periods, the overall evidence supports TENS as a viable option for managing TN pain. Future research should focus on standardizing TENS protocols and evaluating long-term efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"25 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-04014-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a prevalent and debilitating craniofacial pain disorder characterized by severe, unilateral, shock-like pain. Standard treatments include anti-epileptic drugs and surgical interventions, but many patients experience limited relief or adverse effects. Non-invasive therapies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), have emerged as alternative options. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TENS in managing primary trigeminal neuralgia.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted, yielding 89 papers. Following selection criteria, five clinical trials involving 101 patients with primary TN and TENS treatment were included. Data on pain severity, TENS parameters, and outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan software, with outcomes assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores before and after TENS treatment.

Results: Pre-treatment VAS scores averaged 8.75 ± 0.18, indicating severe pain. Post-treatment, the mean VAS score significantly decreased to 1.17 ± 0.55, demonstrating substantial pain relief. The meta-analysis revealed a mean difference of 7.49 (95% CI: 7.05 to 7.93) in VAS scores, with a p-value < 0.05, indicating statistically significant pain reduction. Heterogeneity among studies was moderate (I2 = 57%). Complications were infrequently reported, with one study noting paresthesia in a small number of patients.

Conclusion: TENS appears to be an effective and safe intervention for reducing pain in patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia. Despite variability in treatment protocols and follow-up periods, the overall evidence supports TENS as a viable option for managing TN pain. Future research should focus on standardizing TENS protocols and evaluating long-term efficacy and safety.

经皮神经电刺激(TENS)后三叉神经痛的改善:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:三叉神经痛(TN)是一种常见的、使人衰弱的颅面疼痛疾病,其特征是严重的、单侧的、休克样疼痛。标准治疗包括抗癫痫药物和手术干预,但许多患者的缓解有限或不良反应。非侵入性治疗,如经皮神经电刺激(TENS),已成为替代选择。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评价TENS治疗原发性三叉神经痛的疗效。方法:综合检索PubMed、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar,共收录89篇论文。按照选择标准,纳入5项临床试验,涉及101例原发性TN和TENS治疗患者。提取疼痛严重程度、TENS参数和结果的数据。采用RevMan软件进行统计学分析,采用视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)评价TENS治疗前后的疗效。结果:治疗前VAS评分平均为8.75±0.18,疼痛剧烈。治疗后,VAS平均评分显著降低至1.17±0.55,疼痛明显缓解。meta分析显示VAS评分的平均差异为7.49 (95% CI: 7.05 ~ 7.93), p值2 = 57%)。并发症很少报道,一项研究指出少数患者感觉异常。结论:TENS是减轻原发性三叉神经痛患者疼痛的一种安全有效的干预手段。尽管治疗方案和随访时间存在差异,但总体证据支持TENS作为治疗TN疼痛的可行选择。未来的研究重点应放在标准化TENS方案和评估长期疗效和安全性上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信