Brenda de Almeida Perret Magalhães, Jéssica Medeiros Minasi, Rubens Caurio Lobato, Luiza Curi Lemos, Laryssa Saez de Britto, Rhaysa Madruga Barros, Ana Maria Barral de Martínez, Vanusa Pousada da Hora
{"title":"Globally approved vaccines for COVID-19: a systematic review.","authors":"Brenda de Almeida Perret Magalhães, Jéssica Medeiros Minasi, Rubens Caurio Lobato, Luiza Curi Lemos, Laryssa Saez de Britto, Rhaysa Madruga Barros, Ana Maria Barral de Martínez, Vanusa Pousada da Hora","doi":"10.1007/s42770-024-01600-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 caused a public health emergency, which instituted a global effort to develop vaccines using different platforms, such as basic types and new-generation vaccines. Considering the importance of vaccination in preventing the severity of infectious diseases and the success in developing and approving vaccines against COVID-19 in record time, it is essential to learn about the characteristics of these vaccines. This study aimed to conduct a structured, systematic review following the PRISMA guideline, to analyze the general characteristics of vaccines approved globally for use against COVID-19. We used the list of approved vaccines available by the WHO as guidance to search for studies in the literature. We searched the terms \"SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine and safety and efficacy\" in the MEDLINE via PUBMED and Web of Science databases. We conducted the research on both bases, including complete articles published from January 2020 to June 2023. The selection of files occurred between May/2021 and June/2023. Therefore, the paper did not consider articles published after this period or vaccines approved after this moment. This study only included approved vaccines; phase three studies published in English. We found 11 published articles from phase three that met the established criteria. The vaccines included in this study were: Cominarty, mRNA-1273 or Spikevax, Vaxzevria or AZD1222 or Covishield, CoronaVac or PicoVacc, and Ad26.COV2.S, SputnikV or Gam-Covid-Vac, Covaxin, NVX-CoV2373 or Covovax or Nuvaxovid, WIV04 and HB02, CoVLP or Covifenz and Convidecia or Ad5-nCoV. We summarized the main findings of each vaccine, considering the vaccine composition, number of doses, efficacy analyses, and main adverse effects. In general, the vaccines had high efficacy rates and few adverse effects. Efficacy values are important for vaccine approval, but they will not necessarily reflect the real-world impact of vaccination. It was seen that the effectiveness of COV2.S, CoronaVac/PicoVacc, Cominarty, and Covaxin vaccines was lower than the efficacy, whereas, for AZD1222/Vaxzevria/Covishield, the two parameters remained at similar rates. All vaccines evaluated have different compositions, dosages, populations, and study designs. All are effective in at least preventing symptomatic COVID-19, causing mild or moderate adverse effects when present.</p>","PeriodicalId":9090,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-024-01600-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
COVID-19 caused a public health emergency, which instituted a global effort to develop vaccines using different platforms, such as basic types and new-generation vaccines. Considering the importance of vaccination in preventing the severity of infectious diseases and the success in developing and approving vaccines against COVID-19 in record time, it is essential to learn about the characteristics of these vaccines. This study aimed to conduct a structured, systematic review following the PRISMA guideline, to analyze the general characteristics of vaccines approved globally for use against COVID-19. We used the list of approved vaccines available by the WHO as guidance to search for studies in the literature. We searched the terms "SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine and safety and efficacy" in the MEDLINE via PUBMED and Web of Science databases. We conducted the research on both bases, including complete articles published from January 2020 to June 2023. The selection of files occurred between May/2021 and June/2023. Therefore, the paper did not consider articles published after this period or vaccines approved after this moment. This study only included approved vaccines; phase three studies published in English. We found 11 published articles from phase three that met the established criteria. The vaccines included in this study were: Cominarty, mRNA-1273 or Spikevax, Vaxzevria or AZD1222 or Covishield, CoronaVac or PicoVacc, and Ad26.COV2.S, SputnikV or Gam-Covid-Vac, Covaxin, NVX-CoV2373 or Covovax or Nuvaxovid, WIV04 and HB02, CoVLP or Covifenz and Convidecia or Ad5-nCoV. We summarized the main findings of each vaccine, considering the vaccine composition, number of doses, efficacy analyses, and main adverse effects. In general, the vaccines had high efficacy rates and few adverse effects. Efficacy values are important for vaccine approval, but they will not necessarily reflect the real-world impact of vaccination. It was seen that the effectiveness of COV2.S, CoronaVac/PicoVacc, Cominarty, and Covaxin vaccines was lower than the efficacy, whereas, for AZD1222/Vaxzevria/Covishield, the two parameters remained at similar rates. All vaccines evaluated have different compositions, dosages, populations, and study designs. All are effective in at least preventing symptomatic COVID-19, causing mild or moderate adverse effects when present.
COVID-19引发了突发公共卫生事件,促使全球努力利用基本类型和新一代疫苗等不同平台开发疫苗。考虑到疫苗接种在预防传染病严重程度方面的重要性,以及在创纪录的时间内成功开发和批准了COVID-19疫苗,了解这些疫苗的特点至关重要。本研究旨在根据PRISMA指南进行结构化、系统的审查,以分析全球批准用于抗COVID-19的疫苗的一般特征。我们使用世界卫生组织提供的已批准疫苗列表作为在文献中搜索研究的指导。我们通过PUBMED和Web of Science数据库在MEDLINE中搜索了“SARS-CoV-2和疫苗以及安全性和有效性”。我们在两个基地进行了研究,包括2020年1月至2023年6月发表的完整文章。文件的选择发生在2021年5月至2023年6月之间。因此,本文不考虑这一时期之后发表的文章,也不考虑这一时期之后批准的疫苗。这项研究只包括批准的疫苗;第三阶段的研究以英文发表。我们从第三阶段找到了11篇符合既定标准的已发表文章。本研究纳入的疫苗包括:Cominarty、mRNA-1273或Spikevax、Vaxzevria或AZD1222或Covishield、CoronaVac或PicoVacc和Ad26.COV2。S、SputnikV或Gam-Covid-Vac、Covaxin、NVX-CoV2373或Covovax或Nuvaxovid、WIV04和HB02、CoVLP或Covifenz和convidia或Ad5-nCoV。我们总结了每种疫苗的主要发现,考虑了疫苗组成、剂量数、疗效分析和主要不良反应。总的来说,疫苗的有效率高,不良反应少。效力值对疫苗批准很重要,但它们不一定反映疫苗接种的实际影响。可以看出,COV2的有效性。S、CoronaVac/PicoVacc、Cominarty和Covaxin疫苗的有效性低于有效性,而对于AZD1222/Vaxzevria/Covishield,这两个参数保持相似的比率。所有评估的疫苗都有不同的成分、剂量、人群和研究设计。所有这些药物至少可有效预防有症状的COVID-19,出现时可引起轻度或中度不良反应。
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Microbiology is an international peer reviewed journal that covers a wide-range of research on fundamental and applied aspects of microbiology.
The journal considers for publication original research articles, short communications, reviews, and letters to the editor, that may be submitted to the following sections: Biotechnology and Industrial Microbiology, Food Microbiology, Bacterial and Fungal Pathogenesis, Clinical Microbiology, Environmental Microbiology, Veterinary Microbiology, Fungal and Bacterial Physiology, Bacterial, Fungal and Virus Molecular Biology, Education in Microbiology. For more details on each section, please check out the instructions for authors.
The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Microbiology and currently publishes 4 issues per year.