Validation of the uncertainty stress scale-high-risk pregnancy - Chinese brief version: Rasch analysis.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yi Jing Tsai, Chi Chen Chen, Yu Yun Hsu, Chuan Chuan Chen
{"title":"Validation of the uncertainty stress scale-high-risk pregnancy - Chinese brief version: Rasch analysis.","authors":"Yi Jing Tsai, Chi Chen Chen, Yu Yun Hsu, Chuan Chuan Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-07078-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-risk pregnancy leads to uncertainty and stress in pregnant women due to the threatened of mother and fetus health. The Uncertainty Stress Scale High-Risk Pregnancy Version, a 54-item Chinese version (USS-HRPV-C), has been widely used to assess the uncertainty and stress that women experience during pregnancy. However, the length of the scale may result in a burden for respondents. Thus, a brief version of the USS-HRPV-C is needed for a concise and vigorous assessment. The aim of this study was to shorten the USS-HRPV-C and validate the brief version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a cross-sectional design. A convenience sample of 200 women with high-risk pregnancies completed the 54-item USS-HRPV- C. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch model to examine the construct validity of the short version of the USS-HRPV-C. Rasch analysis was used with a stepwise approach to select items with better goodness-of-fit and no differential item functioning (DIF). Additionally, Cronbachs' α and Pearson correlations to evaluate the internal consistency of the original and brief versions. Test analysis modules (TAM) and Lavaan packages in R were used for data analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of CFA supported a two-factor structure of the HRPV-C. Using the Rasch analysis, we reduced the USS-HRPV-C scale from 54 to 17 items. The selected 17 items were robust without displaying differential item functioning. Further, the 17-item short version exhibited satisfactory fit statistics that infit and outfit mean square ranged between 0.71 and 1.35, respectively. Internal consistency of Cronbach's α for the short version of the USS-HRPV-C scale ranged was 0.90 and 0.92 for the subscales of uncertainty and stress respectively. Both subscales of the brief version were significantly related to the original version of USS-HRPV-C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed a 17-item brief version of the USS-HRPV-C scale, which has demonstrated its satisfactory psychometric properties. Healthcare providers can use the validated brief version of the USS-HRPV-C to proficiently assess women's psychosocial stress and uncertainty during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-07078-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-risk pregnancy leads to uncertainty and stress in pregnant women due to the threatened of mother and fetus health. The Uncertainty Stress Scale High-Risk Pregnancy Version, a 54-item Chinese version (USS-HRPV-C), has been widely used to assess the uncertainty and stress that women experience during pregnancy. However, the length of the scale may result in a burden for respondents. Thus, a brief version of the USS-HRPV-C is needed for a concise and vigorous assessment. The aim of this study was to shorten the USS-HRPV-C and validate the brief version.

Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design. A convenience sample of 200 women with high-risk pregnancies completed the 54-item USS-HRPV- C. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch model to examine the construct validity of the short version of the USS-HRPV-C. Rasch analysis was used with a stepwise approach to select items with better goodness-of-fit and no differential item functioning (DIF). Additionally, Cronbachs' α and Pearson correlations to evaluate the internal consistency of the original and brief versions. Test analysis modules (TAM) and Lavaan packages in R were used for data analyses.

Results: The results of CFA supported a two-factor structure of the HRPV-C. Using the Rasch analysis, we reduced the USS-HRPV-C scale from 54 to 17 items. The selected 17 items were robust without displaying differential item functioning. Further, the 17-item short version exhibited satisfactory fit statistics that infit and outfit mean square ranged between 0.71 and 1.35, respectively. Internal consistency of Cronbach's α for the short version of the USS-HRPV-C scale ranged was 0.90 and 0.92 for the subscales of uncertainty and stress respectively. Both subscales of the brief version were significantly related to the original version of USS-HRPV-C.

Conclusions: This study developed a 17-item brief version of the USS-HRPV-C scale, which has demonstrated its satisfactory psychometric properties. Healthcare providers can use the validated brief version of the USS-HRPV-C to proficiently assess women's psychosocial stress and uncertainty during pregnancy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信