A review of kilovoltage radiotherapy treatment in the United Kingdom: quality control, radiation dosimetry, treatment equipment, and workload.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Antony L Palmer, Jason Brimelow, Patrick Downes, Mayur Munshi, David Nash, Bhupinder Rai, Andrew R White
{"title":"A review of kilovoltage radiotherapy treatment in the United Kingdom: quality control, radiation dosimetry, treatment equipment, and workload.","authors":"Antony L Palmer, Jason Brimelow, Patrick Downes, Mayur Munshi, David Nash, Bhupinder Rai, Andrew R White","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To survey kilovoltage (kV) radiotherapy in the United Kingdom, updating a 2016 study, focussing on radiotherapy physics, including equipment quality control (QC) and radiation dosimetry, with information on installed equipment and clinical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All UK radiotherapy physics departments (n = 68) were invited to complete a comprehensive survey. An analysis of the installed equipment base, patient numbers, clinical activity, QC testing, and radiation dosimetry processes were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>91% of centres (n = 62) responded to the survey. kV radiotherapy was available in 70% of UK radiotherapy departments, with a wide variation in workload; 7-436 patients/centre annually. There has been an increase in centres using treatment calculation software rather than manual methods, up from 36% in 2016 to 50% currently. Only 50% of centres use an independent calculation check method. There was an increase in the use of the addendum to the UK dosimetry code of practice, enabling medium energy calibration in-air rather than at depth in phantom, citing \"clinical relevance.\" Appropriate levels of QC testing were being conducted at UK centres, with Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) Report 81 cited as a primary source of guidance. Good consensus for the frequency and tolerance values used for QC was seen across UK centres.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A comprehensive review of consensus practice for QC and dosimetry in kV radiotherapy across the United Kingdom is presented, with supporting information on equipment installation and clinical use.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Updated data are presented on kV radiotherapy treatment in the United Kingdom, with focus on physics aspects of QC and dosimetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"392-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To survey kilovoltage (kV) radiotherapy in the United Kingdom, updating a 2016 study, focussing on radiotherapy physics, including equipment quality control (QC) and radiation dosimetry, with information on installed equipment and clinical activity.

Methods: All UK radiotherapy physics departments (n = 68) were invited to complete a comprehensive survey. An analysis of the installed equipment base, patient numbers, clinical activity, QC testing, and radiation dosimetry processes were undertaken.

Results: 91% of centres (n = 62) responded to the survey. kV radiotherapy was available in 70% of UK radiotherapy departments, with a wide variation in workload; 7-436 patients/centre annually. There has been an increase in centres using treatment calculation software rather than manual methods, up from 36% in 2016 to 50% currently. Only 50% of centres use an independent calculation check method. There was an increase in the use of the addendum to the UK dosimetry code of practice, enabling medium energy calibration in-air rather than at depth in phantom, citing "clinical relevance." Appropriate levels of QC testing were being conducted at UK centres, with Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) Report 81 cited as a primary source of guidance. Good consensus for the frequency and tolerance values used for QC was seen across UK centres.

Conclusions: A comprehensive review of consensus practice for QC and dosimetry in kV radiotherapy across the United Kingdom is presented, with supporting information on equipment installation and clinical use.

Advances in knowledge: Updated data are presented on kV radiotherapy treatment in the United Kingdom, with focus on physics aspects of QC and dosimetry.

英国千伏(kV)放射治疗综述:质量控制、辐射剂量学、治疗设备和工作量。
目的:调查英国的千伏(kV)放疗,更新2016年的一项研究,重点关注放疗物理,包括设备质量控制(QC)和辐射剂量学,以及已安装设备和临床活动的信息。方法:邀请英国所有放疗物理系(68家)进行全面调查。对已安装的设备基础、患者数量、临床活动、质量控制测试和辐射剂量测定过程进行了分析。结果:91%的中心(n = 62)回应了调查。英国70%的放疗部门提供千伏放疗,但工作量差异很大;每年7至436名病人/中心。使用治疗计算软件而不是人工方法的中心有所增加,从2016年的36%增加到当前研究的50%。只有50%的中心使用不同于主要方法的计算检查方法。英国剂量学实践规范附录的使用也有所增加,允许在空气中而不是在幽灵深处进行介质能量校准,理由是“临床相关性”。英国各中心正在进行适当水平的质量控制测试,IPEM报告81被引用为指导的主要来源。在英国各中心,对用于质量控制的频率和公差值达成了良好的共识。结论:对全英国千伏放射治疗质量控制和剂量学的共识实践进行了全面审查,并提供了设备安装和临床使用的支持信息。知识进展:英国kV放射治疗的最新数据,重点是QC和剂量学的物理方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信