Ultrasound Assessment of Muscle and Fascia Properties and the Effects of Spasticity and Botulinum Toxin Injections on Spastic Muscles in Chronic Stroke Survivors.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Elaine M Magat, Kelly Horstmann, Gerard E Francisco, Sheng Li
{"title":"Ultrasound Assessment of Muscle and Fascia Properties and the Effects of Spasticity and Botulinum Toxin Injections on Spastic Muscles in Chronic Stroke Survivors.","authors":"Elaine M Magat, Kelly Horstmann, Gerard E Francisco, Sheng Li","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to objectively quantify changes in muscle properties in chronic stroke survivors and the effects of spasticity and botulinum toxin injections on muscle properties using ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this cross-sectional observational study, 24 stroke subjects with history of botulinum toxin injections to biceps brachii muscles but without botulinum toxin injections to the triceps were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve subjects had spastic triceps, and the other half did not. Twenty subjects had spasticity in wrist flexors, and 11 subjects received botulinum toxin injections to the flexor carpii ulnaris. On average, a significant decrease in muscle thickness (16.5% loss in triceps), a thicker fascia with higher echo intensity was noted on muscles in the paretic limb. Percent muscle loss was significantly less (11.0%) in spastic triceps than in nonspastic triceps (22.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in muscle and fascia properties in spastic flexor carpii ulnaris with and without botulinum toxin injection. Spasticity did not correlate significantly with muscle loss, fascia thickness, or echo intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results provided evidence that muscles on the spastic-paretic side had less muscle mass, thicker fascia, and greater echo intensity. Our results showed that spasticity helped maintain muscle mass but failed to reveal additional muscle loss after botulinum toxin injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"527-533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to objectively quantify changes in muscle properties in chronic stroke survivors and the effects of spasticity and botulinum toxin injections on muscle properties using ultrasonography.

Design: In this cross-sectional observational study, 24 stroke subjects with history of botulinum toxin injections to biceps brachii muscles but without botulinum toxin injections to the triceps were included.

Results: Twelve subjects had spastic triceps, and the other half did not. Twenty subjects had spasticity in wrist flexors, and 11 subjects received botulinum toxin injections to the flexor carpii ulnaris. On average, a significant decrease in muscle thickness (16.5% loss in triceps), a thicker fascia with higher echo intensity was noted on muscles in the paretic limb. Percent muscle loss was significantly less (11.0%) in spastic triceps than in nonspastic triceps (22.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in muscle and fascia properties in spastic flexor carpii ulnaris with and without botulinum toxin injection. Spasticity did not correlate significantly with muscle loss, fascia thickness, or echo intensity.

Conclusions: Our results provided evidence that muscles on the spastic-paretic side had less muscle mass, thicker fascia, and greater echo intensity. Our results showed that spasticity helped maintain muscle mass but failed to reveal additional muscle loss after botulinum toxin injection.

慢性中风幸存者肌肉和筋膜特性的超声评估以及痉挛和肉毒杆菌毒素注射对痉挛肌肉的影响。
目的:利用超声技术客观量化慢性脑卒中幸存者肌肉特性的变化以及痉挛和肉毒毒素注射(BoNTi)对肌肉特性的影响。设计:在这项横断面观察性研究中,纳入了24例有肱二头肌(BB) BoNTi病史但没有肱三头肌(TRI) BoNTi的卒中受试者。结果:12例有痉挛性TRI,另一半无。腕屈肌痉挛20例,尺侧腕屈肌BoNTi治疗11例。平均而言,肌肉厚度明显减少(TRI减少16.5%),瘫肢体肌肉筋膜增厚,回声强度更高。痉挛性TRI的肌肉损失(PML)百分比(11.0%)明显低于非痉挛性TRI(22.1%)。在有和没有BoNTi的痉挛性FCU中,肌肉和筋膜特性无统计学差异。痉挛与肌肉损失、筋膜厚度或回声强度无显著相关性。结论:痉挛性麻痹侧肌肉质量较小,筋膜较厚,回声强度较大。我们的研究结果表明,痉挛有助于维持肌肉质量,但未能揭示肉毒杆菌毒素注射后额外的肌肉损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信