Does cyber dating abuse victimization predict next-day alcohol and cannabis use among college students?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Meagan J Brem, T J Shaw, Allison Tobar-Santamaria
{"title":"Does cyber dating abuse victimization predict next-day alcohol and cannabis use among college students?","authors":"Meagan J Brem, T J Shaw, Allison Tobar-Santamaria","doi":"10.1111/ajad.13672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Cyber dating abuse (CDA) is prevalent on college campuses, with 43% of college students experiencing CDA each year. Yet, the potential impacts of CDA victimization on college students' health outcomes remain poorly understood. Informed by the self-medication hypothesis and longitudinal data linking dating abuse to substance use outcomes, the present study tested the hypothesis that CDA victimization positively associates with college students' next-day alcohol use (number of drinks consumed, odds of any drinking) and odds of cannabis use (yes/no). We also explored whether CDA's association with next-day substance use varied as a function of gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Daily data on alcohol use, cannabis use, and CDA victimization were collected across 60 consecutive days from 236 undergraduates who were in dating relationships (73.73% cisgender women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel modeling revealed gender differences. Among men, CDA victimization predicted next-day cannabis use (aOR = 7.34, p < .001), but negatively related to the number of drinks consumed the following day (B = -2.63, p < .001). Among women, CDA victimization did not relate to next-day cannabis or alcohol use. Regardless of gender, CDA victimization was unrelated to the odds of any drinking.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>College men are more likely to use cannabis the day after experiencing CDA victimization relative to other days. Targeting CDA and related aftermath may benefit college-based substance use intervention.</p><p><strong>Scientific significance: </strong>This is the first study to identify that cannabis use occurs subsequent to CDA victimization, which can inform college-based CDA and cannabis use prevention programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal on Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.13672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Cyber dating abuse (CDA) is prevalent on college campuses, with 43% of college students experiencing CDA each year. Yet, the potential impacts of CDA victimization on college students' health outcomes remain poorly understood. Informed by the self-medication hypothesis and longitudinal data linking dating abuse to substance use outcomes, the present study tested the hypothesis that CDA victimization positively associates with college students' next-day alcohol use (number of drinks consumed, odds of any drinking) and odds of cannabis use (yes/no). We also explored whether CDA's association with next-day substance use varied as a function of gender.

Methods: Daily data on alcohol use, cannabis use, and CDA victimization were collected across 60 consecutive days from 236 undergraduates who were in dating relationships (73.73% cisgender women).

Results: Multilevel modeling revealed gender differences. Among men, CDA victimization predicted next-day cannabis use (aOR = 7.34, p < .001), but negatively related to the number of drinks consumed the following day (B = -2.63, p < .001). Among women, CDA victimization did not relate to next-day cannabis or alcohol use. Regardless of gender, CDA victimization was unrelated to the odds of any drinking.

Discussion and conclusions: College men are more likely to use cannabis the day after experiencing CDA victimization relative to other days. Targeting CDA and related aftermath may benefit college-based substance use intervention.

Scientific significance: This is the first study to identify that cannabis use occurs subsequent to CDA victimization, which can inform college-based CDA and cannabis use prevention programming.

网络约会虐待受害者是否预示着大学生第二天会使用酒精和大麻?
背景和目的:网络约会虐待(CDA)在大学校园很普遍,每年有43%的大学生经历过CDA。然而,CDA受害对大学生健康结果的潜在影响仍然知之甚少。根据自我药物治疗假设和将约会滥用与物质使用结果联系起来的纵向数据,本研究验证了CDA受害与大学生第二天饮酒(饮酒数量、饮酒几率)和大麻使用几率(是/否)呈正相关的假设。我们还探讨了CDA与第二天药物使用的关系是否因性别而异。方法:连续60天收集236名有约会关系的大学生(73.73%为顺性女性)的每日酒精使用、大麻使用和CDA受害数据。结果:多层次模型揭示了性别差异。在男性中,CDA受害预测第二天的大麻使用(aOR = 7.34, p)。讨论和结论:大学生男性在经历CDA受害后的第二天使用大麻的可能性高于其他日子。针对CDA和相关后果可能有利于以大学为基础的药物使用干预。科学意义:这是第一个确定大麻使用发生在CDA受害之后的研究,这可以为基于大学的CDA和大麻使用预防规划提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Addictions is the official journal of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry. The Academy encourages research on the etiology, prevention, identification, and treatment of substance abuse; thus, the journal provides a forum for the dissemination of information in the extensive field of addiction. Each issue of this publication covers a wide variety of topics ranging from codependence to genetics, epidemiology to dual diagnostics, etiology to neuroscience, and much more. Features of the journal, all written by experts in the field, include special overview articles, clinical or basic research papers, clinical updates, and book reviews within the area of addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信