Machine learning models provide modest accuracy in predicting clinical impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome type 2 in Canadian sow herds.
Dylan John Melmer, Terri L O'Sullivan, Amy Greer, Davor Ojkic, Robert Friendship, Zvonimir Poljak
{"title":"Machine learning models provide modest accuracy in predicting clinical impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome type 2 in Canadian sow herds.","authors":"Dylan John Melmer, Terri L O'Sullivan, Amy Greer, Davor Ojkic, Robert Friendship, Zvonimir Poljak","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the predictive potential of the open reading frame 5 nucleotide sequence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus and the basic demographic data on the severity of the impact on selected production parameters during clinical PRRS outbreaks in Ontario sow herds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective longitudinal study of clinical outbreaks in Ontario sow herds at various points between September 5, 2009, and February 5, 2019, was conducted using herds as units of analysis. Data were gathered from study sow farms in Ontario at the start of each clinical outbreak. Six machine learning models and 2 different genetic input structures of open reading frame 5 sequences were utilized to predict the impact on abortion and preweaning mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extreme boosting machine learning models with genetic data represented through 2-dimensional multiple correspondence analysis had the highest accuracy when predicting clinical outcomes (60.8% [SD = 12.4%] and 74.4% [SD = 13.2%]) for abortion and preweaning mortality outcomes, respectively. The mean sensitivity of classifying outbreaks with a high impact on abortion was 50%, with a specificity of 89.2%. The mean sensitivity of classifying outbreaks with high preweaning mortality was 56.2%, with a specificity of 85.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data and methods utilized herein exhibited improvement in accuracy over the baseline; however, this increase was not sufficient to warrant field implementation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Predictive models based on observed data could assist practitioners in linking the genetics of the PRRS virus with clinical impact in clinical settings. Models trained in this study show promise for PRRS clinical impact prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the predictive potential of the open reading frame 5 nucleotide sequence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus and the basic demographic data on the severity of the impact on selected production parameters during clinical PRRS outbreaks in Ontario sow herds.
Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study of clinical outbreaks in Ontario sow herds at various points between September 5, 2009, and February 5, 2019, was conducted using herds as units of analysis. Data were gathered from study sow farms in Ontario at the start of each clinical outbreak. Six machine learning models and 2 different genetic input structures of open reading frame 5 sequences were utilized to predict the impact on abortion and preweaning mortality.
Results: Extreme boosting machine learning models with genetic data represented through 2-dimensional multiple correspondence analysis had the highest accuracy when predicting clinical outcomes (60.8% [SD = 12.4%] and 74.4% [SD = 13.2%]) for abortion and preweaning mortality outcomes, respectively. The mean sensitivity of classifying outbreaks with a high impact on abortion was 50%, with a specificity of 89.2%. The mean sensitivity of classifying outbreaks with high preweaning mortality was 56.2%, with a specificity of 85.2%.
Conclusions: The data and methods utilized herein exhibited improvement in accuracy over the baseline; however, this increase was not sufficient to warrant field implementation.
Clinical relevance: Predictive models based on observed data could assist practitioners in linking the genetics of the PRRS virus with clinical impact in clinical settings. Models trained in this study show promise for PRRS clinical impact prediction.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.