Status of Sepsis Care in European Hospitals: Results from an International Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Christian S Scheer, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Ricard Ferrer, Evgeny A Idelevich, Djillali Annane, Antonio Artigas, Abdullah Tarik Aslan, Gabriella Bottari, Hjalmar R Bouma, Vladimir Černý, Renata Curić Radivojević, Konstantina Dakou, Ken Dewitte, Mohamed Elbahnasawy, Matthias Gründling, Mohan Gurjar, Johanna Hästbacka, Miltiadis Kyprianou, Said Laribi, Annmarie Lassen, Konstantin Lebedinskii, Jan Máca, Manu L N G Malbrain, Gianpaola Monti, Marlies Ostermann, Michael Osthoff, José-Artur Paiva, Michela Sabbatucci, Jakub Śmiechowicz, Mihai Gabriel Ştefan, Marcus Vollmer, Natalija Vuković, Kyriakos Zaragkoulias, Konrad Reinhart, Adam Linder, Daniela Filipescu
{"title":"Status of Sepsis Care in European Hospitals: Results from an International Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Christian S Scheer, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Ricard Ferrer, Evgeny A Idelevich, Djillali Annane, Antonio Artigas, Abdullah Tarik Aslan, Gabriella Bottari, Hjalmar R Bouma, Vladimir Černý, Renata Curić Radivojević, Konstantina Dakou, Ken Dewitte, Mohamed Elbahnasawy, Matthias Gründling, Mohan Gurjar, Johanna Hästbacka, Miltiadis Kyprianou, Said Laribi, Annmarie Lassen, Konstantin Lebedinskii, Jan Máca, Manu L N G Malbrain, Gianpaola Monti, Marlies Ostermann, Michael Osthoff, José-Artur Paiva, Michela Sabbatucci, Jakub Śmiechowicz, Mihai Gabriel Ştefan, Marcus Vollmer, Natalija Vuković, Kyriakos Zaragkoulias, Konrad Reinhart, Adam Linder, Daniela Filipescu","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202406-1167OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Early detection, standardized therapy, adequate infrastructure, and strategies for quality improvement should constitute essential components of every hospital's sepsis plan. <b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the extent to which recommendations from the sepsis guidelines are implemented and the availability of infrastructure for the care of patients with sepsis in acute-care hospitals. <b>Methods:</b> A multidisciplinary cross-sectional questionnaire was used to investigate sepsis care in hospitals. This included the use of sepsis definitions, the implementation of sepsis guideline recommendations, diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure, antibiotic stewardship, and quality improvement initiatives (QIIs) in hospitals. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> A total of 1,023 hospitals in 69 countries were included. Most of them, 835 (81.6%), were in Europe. Sepsis screening was used in 54.2% of emergency departments (EDs), 47.9% of wards, and 61.7% of ICUs. Sepsis management was standardized in 57.3% of EDs, 45.2% of wards, and 70.7% of ICUs. The implementation of comprehensive QIIs was associated with increased screening (EDs, +33.3%; wards, +44.4%; ICUs, +23.8% absolute difference) and increased standardized sepsis management (EDs, +33.6%; wards, +40.0%; ICUs, +17.7% absolute difference) compared with hospitals without QIIs. A total of 9.8% of hospitals had implemented ongoing QIIs, and 4.6% had invested in sepsis programs. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings indicate that there is considerable room for improvement in a large number of mainly European hospitals, particularly with regard to early identification and standardized management of sepsis, the availability of guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure, and the implementation of QIIs. Further efforts are required to implement a more comprehensive and appropriate quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"587-599"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202406-1167OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Early detection, standardized therapy, adequate infrastructure, and strategies for quality improvement should constitute essential components of every hospital's sepsis plan. Objectives: To investigate the extent to which recommendations from the sepsis guidelines are implemented and the availability of infrastructure for the care of patients with sepsis in acute-care hospitals. Methods: A multidisciplinary cross-sectional questionnaire was used to investigate sepsis care in hospitals. This included the use of sepsis definitions, the implementation of sepsis guideline recommendations, diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure, antibiotic stewardship, and quality improvement initiatives (QIIs) in hospitals. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1,023 hospitals in 69 countries were included. Most of them, 835 (81.6%), were in Europe. Sepsis screening was used in 54.2% of emergency departments (EDs), 47.9% of wards, and 61.7% of ICUs. Sepsis management was standardized in 57.3% of EDs, 45.2% of wards, and 70.7% of ICUs. The implementation of comprehensive QIIs was associated with increased screening (EDs, +33.3%; wards, +44.4%; ICUs, +23.8% absolute difference) and increased standardized sepsis management (EDs, +33.6%; wards, +40.0%; ICUs, +17.7% absolute difference) compared with hospitals without QIIs. A total of 9.8% of hospitals had implemented ongoing QIIs, and 4.6% had invested in sepsis programs. Conclusions: The findings indicate that there is considerable room for improvement in a large number of mainly European hospitals, particularly with regard to early identification and standardized management of sepsis, the availability of guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure, and the implementation of QIIs. Further efforts are required to implement a more comprehensive and appropriate quality of care.

欧洲医院脓毒症护理状况:来自国际横断面调查的结果。
理由:早期发现、标准化治疗、充足的基础设施和质量改进战略应构成每家医院败血症计划的基本组成部分。目的:调查脓毒症指南建议的实施程度,以及急性医院脓毒症患者护理基础设施的可用性。方法:采用多学科横断面调查问卷对医院脓毒症护理进行调查。这包括脓毒症定义的使用、脓毒症指南建议的实施、诊断和治疗基础设施、抗生素管理和医院质量改进举措。测量结果和主要结果:包括69个国家的1023家医院。其中835人(81.6%)来自欧洲。54.2%的急诊科(EDs)、47.9%的病房和61.7%的重症监护病房(icu)采用了脓毒症筛查。57.3%的急诊科、45.2%的病房和70.7%的icu的脓毒症管理标准化。综合质量改善计划(qi)的实施与筛查增加相关(ed +33.3%;病房+ 44.4%;icu +23.8%绝对差异)和标准化脓毒症管理增加(EDs +33.6%;病房+ 40.0%;icu: +17.7%的绝对差异)与没有qi的医院相比。9.8%的医院实施了持续的质量评价指标,4.6%的医院投资了败血症项目。结论:研究结果表明,在以欧洲为主的大量医院中,特别是在败血症的早期识别和标准化管理、指南的可用性、诊断和治疗基础设施以及qi的实施方面,仍有相当大的改进空间。需要作出进一步努力,以实现更全面和适当的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信