Hand Preferences in Olive Baboons (Papio anubis) During Cognitive Performance on Match-to-Sample Tasks and Natural Behaviors.

IF 2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Logan R Brownell, Jessica F Cantlon, Caroline M DeLong
{"title":"Hand Preferences in Olive Baboons (Papio anubis) During Cognitive Performance on Match-to-Sample Tasks and Natural Behaviors.","authors":"Logan R Brownell, Jessica F Cantlon, Caroline M DeLong","doi":"10.1002/ajp.23728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An individual shows handedness when they consistently prefer one hand over the other for tasks that can be performed with either hand. Humans have a population-level right-hand preference, and past research shows that a variety of nonhuman primate species also show hand preferences. More complex manual tasks elicit stronger hand preferences than less complex manual tasks, but not much is known about hand preferences during a cognitive task in nonhuman primates. The current study investigated hand preferences in olive baboons (Papio anubis). Seven baboons participated in a match-to-sample task on a touchscreen computer. We recorded each baboon's hand use as they touched the start box, sample stimulus, choice stimulus, and which hand they used to retrieve the food reward. All 10 baboons in the troop were also observed in their outdoor zoo habitat, where they were carrying out natural behaviors. In the current study, the touchscreen task was cognitively demanding, without being manually complex, as the baboon simply touched the screen. The direction and strength of hand preference were calculated using z-scores and handedness index (HI) scores for each individual baboon. When completing the cognitive task, five baboons were left-handed, and two baboons were right-handed. Five of the baboons had strong preferences (three left-handed and two right-handed) and two had weak preferences. When engaging in natural behaviors, eight baboons were left-handed, one baboon was right-handed, and one baboon was ambiguously handed. Two of the baboons had strong preferences (one right-handed and one left-handed), and eight had weak preferences. Four of the seven baboons had consistent hand preferences when completing the cognitive task and when engaging in natural behaviors in their habitat. These results show that similar to manually complex tasks, a complex cognitive task such as match-to-sample elicits stronger and more directional hand preferences than natural behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"87 1","pages":"e23728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An individual shows handedness when they consistently prefer one hand over the other for tasks that can be performed with either hand. Humans have a population-level right-hand preference, and past research shows that a variety of nonhuman primate species also show hand preferences. More complex manual tasks elicit stronger hand preferences than less complex manual tasks, but not much is known about hand preferences during a cognitive task in nonhuman primates. The current study investigated hand preferences in olive baboons (Papio anubis). Seven baboons participated in a match-to-sample task on a touchscreen computer. We recorded each baboon's hand use as they touched the start box, sample stimulus, choice stimulus, and which hand they used to retrieve the food reward. All 10 baboons in the troop were also observed in their outdoor zoo habitat, where they were carrying out natural behaviors. In the current study, the touchscreen task was cognitively demanding, without being manually complex, as the baboon simply touched the screen. The direction and strength of hand preference were calculated using z-scores and handedness index (HI) scores for each individual baboon. When completing the cognitive task, five baboons were left-handed, and two baboons were right-handed. Five of the baboons had strong preferences (three left-handed and two right-handed) and two had weak preferences. When engaging in natural behaviors, eight baboons were left-handed, one baboon was right-handed, and one baboon was ambiguously handed. Two of the baboons had strong preferences (one right-handed and one left-handed), and eight had weak preferences. Four of the seven baboons had consistent hand preferences when completing the cognitive task and when engaging in natural behaviors in their habitat. These results show that similar to manually complex tasks, a complex cognitive task such as match-to-sample elicits stronger and more directional hand preferences than natural behaviors.

在匹配样本任务和自然行为的认知表现中,橄榄狒狒的手偏好。
当一个人总是喜欢用一只手而不是另一只手来完成可以用两只手完成的任务时,就会表现出用手性。人类有惯用右手的习惯,过去的研究表明,多种非人类灵长类动物也表现出惯用右手的习惯。更复杂的手工任务比不那么复杂的手工任务更容易引起手的偏好,但在非人类灵长类动物的认知任务中,对手的偏好知之甚少。目前的研究调查了橄榄狒狒(Papio anubis)的手部偏好。七只狒狒在触摸屏电脑上参与了一项匹配样本的任务。我们记录了每只狒狒触摸起始盒子、样本刺激、选择刺激时的手的使用情况,以及它们用来取回食物奖励的那只手。团队中的所有10只狒狒也在它们的户外动物园栖息地进行了观察,在那里它们进行了自然行为。在目前的研究中,触屏任务需要认知能力,不需要手动操作,因为狒狒只是触摸屏幕。使用z分数和手性指数(HI)分数计算每只狒狒的手偏好方向和强度。在完成认知任务时,5只狒狒是左撇子,2只狒狒是右撇子。其中5只狒狒有强烈的偏好(3只惯用左手,2只惯用右手),2只偏好较弱。在从事自然行为时,8只狒狒是左撇子,1只狒狒是右撇子,1只狒狒是模棱两可的左撇子。两只狒狒有强烈的偏好(一只惯用右手,一只惯用左手),八只偏好较弱。七只狒狒中有四只在完成认知任务和在栖息地从事自然行为时具有一致的手部偏好。这些结果表明,与手动复杂任务类似,与自然行为相比,复杂的认知任务(如匹配样本)会引发更强、更有方向性的手部偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike. Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信