Zoe Memel, Amy Yu, Cynthia Fenton, Timothy Wen, Roxanna A Irani, Li Zhang, Uma Mahadevan
{"title":"The Effect of Low-dose Aspirin on Disease Activity in Pregnant Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Zoe Memel, Amy Yu, Cynthia Fenton, Timothy Wen, Roxanna A Irani, Li Zhang, Uma Mahadevan","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Low-dose aspirin (LDA) is recommended for pregnant individuals at elevated risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). However, regular aspirin use may raise concerns of increased disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of LDA use in pregnant IBD patients and the effect of LDA on IBD disease activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included were individuals with IBD and pregnancy followed by Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) between 1/1/2013-12/31/2022. LDA use was ascertained from medication lists during pregnancy. Primary outcome was IBD flare during pregnancy or six months postpartum, defined as IBD-related hospitalization or surgery, new therapy initiation, elevated fecal calprotectin, or new active endoscopic disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 320 pregnancies in women with IBD (232 patients), 90 (28%) were prescribed aspirin during pregnancy. The percentage of women with IBD flare during pregnancy or postpartum was similar among those who were and were not prescribed aspirin (20% vs 26%, p=0.36). Individuals on aspirin were older (35 vs 34 median years), more likely to have preterm birth (21% vs 14%), higher parity (2 vs 1), and cesarean delivery (50% vs 27%) than individuals not on LDA, (all p<0.01). Both groups had similar rates of HDP, though individuals on LDA had higher rates of preeclampsia (10% vs 4.3%, p=0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately one-third of patients with IBD cared for in a MFM practice were prescribed LDA during pregnancy. The use of aspirin among pregnant patients with IBD was not associated with an increased risk of disease activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003304","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Low-dose aspirin (LDA) is recommended for pregnant individuals at elevated risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). However, regular aspirin use may raise concerns of increased disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of LDA use in pregnant IBD patients and the effect of LDA on IBD disease activity.
Methods: Included were individuals with IBD and pregnancy followed by Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) between 1/1/2013-12/31/2022. LDA use was ascertained from medication lists during pregnancy. Primary outcome was IBD flare during pregnancy or six months postpartum, defined as IBD-related hospitalization or surgery, new therapy initiation, elevated fecal calprotectin, or new active endoscopic disease.
Results: Among 320 pregnancies in women with IBD (232 patients), 90 (28%) were prescribed aspirin during pregnancy. The percentage of women with IBD flare during pregnancy or postpartum was similar among those who were and were not prescribed aspirin (20% vs 26%, p=0.36). Individuals on aspirin were older (35 vs 34 median years), more likely to have preterm birth (21% vs 14%), higher parity (2 vs 1), and cesarean delivery (50% vs 27%) than individuals not on LDA, (all p<0.01). Both groups had similar rates of HDP, though individuals on LDA had higher rates of preeclampsia (10% vs 4.3%, p=0.10).
Conclusion: Approximately one-third of patients with IBD cared for in a MFM practice were prescribed LDA during pregnancy. The use of aspirin among pregnant patients with IBD was not associated with an increased risk of disease activity.
目的:低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)推荐用于妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)风险升高的孕妇。然而,定期使用阿司匹林可能会增加炎症性肠病(IBD)患者疾病活动性的担忧。我们的目的是评估妊娠IBD患者使用LDA的流行程度以及LDA对IBD疾病活动性的影响。方法:纳入2013年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间接受母胎医学(MFM)治疗的IBD和妊娠患者。LDA的使用是从怀孕期间的药物清单中确定的。主要结局是妊娠期或产后6个月IBD发作,定义为IBD相关住院或手术、新治疗开始、粪便钙保护蛋白升高或新的活动性内窥镜疾病。结果:320例妊娠IBD患者(232例)中,90例(28%)在妊娠期间服用阿司匹林。妊娠期或产后IBD发作的女性比例在服用和未服用阿司匹林的女性中相似(20% vs 26%, p=0.36)。服用阿司匹林的患者比不服用LDA的患者年龄更大(35岁vs 34岁),更容易早产(21% vs 14%),胎次更高(2 vs 1),剖宫产(50% vs 27%),(所有结论:在MFM实践中护理的IBD患者中约有三分之一在怀孕期间服用LDA。妊娠IBD患者使用阿司匹林与疾病活动风险增加无关。
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.