Flood-driven survival and growth of dominant C4 grasses helps set their distributions along tallgrass prairie moisture gradients.

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
American Journal of Botany Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1002/ajb2.16457
Robert W Wernerehl, Thomas J Givnish
{"title":"Flood-driven survival and growth of dominant C<sub>4</sub> grasses helps set their distributions along tallgrass prairie moisture gradients.","authors":"Robert W Wernerehl, Thomas J Givnish","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>Five C<sub>4</sub> grasses (Bouteloua curtipendula, Schizachyrium scoparium, Andropogon gerardii, Sorghastrum nutans, Spartina pectinata) dominate different portions of a moisture gradient from dry to wet tallgrass prairies in the Upper Midwest of the United States. We hypothesized that their distributions may partly reflect differences in flooding tolerance and context-specific growth relative to each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested these ideas with greenhouse flooding and drought experiments, outdoor mesocosm experiments, and a natural experiment involving a month-long flood in two wet-mesic prairies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bouteloua promptly succumbed to inundation, so flooding intolerance likely excludes it from wet and wet-mesic prairies. Competition is likely to exclude short-statured Bouteloua from productive mesic sites. Schizachyrium is excluded from wet prairies by low flooding tolerance, demonstrated by all experiments. Sorghastrum had low flooding tolerance in both greenhouse and natural experiments, suggesting that physiological intolerance excludes it from wet prairies. Spartina had by far the greatest growth under the wettest mesocosm conditions; this and comparisons of species growth in monocultures vs. mixtures suggests that competition helps it dominate wet prairies. Indeed, quadrat presence of Spartina increased by 57% two years after flooding of two prairies, while that of upland grasses declined by 44%. The high flooding tolerance, lack of significant differences from other species in drought tolerance, and tall stature of Andropogon suggest that broad physiological tolerance combined with competitive ability allows it to thrive across the prairie moisture gradient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flooding helps shape the distributions of dominant prairie grasses, and its effects may become more important as extreme rain events continue to increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":" ","pages":"e16457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise: Five C4 grasses (Bouteloua curtipendula, Schizachyrium scoparium, Andropogon gerardii, Sorghastrum nutans, Spartina pectinata) dominate different portions of a moisture gradient from dry to wet tallgrass prairies in the Upper Midwest of the United States. We hypothesized that their distributions may partly reflect differences in flooding tolerance and context-specific growth relative to each other.

Methods: We tested these ideas with greenhouse flooding and drought experiments, outdoor mesocosm experiments, and a natural experiment involving a month-long flood in two wet-mesic prairies.

Results: Bouteloua promptly succumbed to inundation, so flooding intolerance likely excludes it from wet and wet-mesic prairies. Competition is likely to exclude short-statured Bouteloua from productive mesic sites. Schizachyrium is excluded from wet prairies by low flooding tolerance, demonstrated by all experiments. Sorghastrum had low flooding tolerance in both greenhouse and natural experiments, suggesting that physiological intolerance excludes it from wet prairies. Spartina had by far the greatest growth under the wettest mesocosm conditions; this and comparisons of species growth in monocultures vs. mixtures suggests that competition helps it dominate wet prairies. Indeed, quadrat presence of Spartina increased by 57% two years after flooding of two prairies, while that of upland grasses declined by 44%. The high flooding tolerance, lack of significant differences from other species in drought tolerance, and tall stature of Andropogon suggest that broad physiological tolerance combined with competitive ability allows it to thrive across the prairie moisture gradient.

Conclusions: Flooding helps shape the distributions of dominant prairie grasses, and its effects may become more important as extreme rain events continue to increase.

优势C4草在洪水驱动下的生存和生长有助于确定其沿高草草原水分梯度的分布。
前提:五种C4禾草(boueloua curtipendula, Schizachyrium scoparium, Andropogon gerardii, Sorghastrum nutans, Spartina pectinata)在美国中西部上游高草草原从干到湿的水分梯度中占主导地位。我们假设它们的分布可能在一定程度上反映了洪水耐受性和环境特异性生长的差异。方法:通过温室洪涝和干旱试验、室外环境试验和两个湿润草原为期一个月的洪水自然试验来验证这些观点。结果:boueloua迅速屈服于洪水,因此洪水不耐受可能将其排除在潮湿和湿润草原之外。竞争可能会将身材矮小的布特卢排除在高产的音乐网站之外。所有的实验都证明,schizachydium因耐涝性低而被排除在潮湿的草原之外。在温室试验和自然试验中,高粱具有较低的耐涝性,表明其生理不耐性将其排除在湿草原之外。在最湿润的中环境条件下,米草属植物的生长速度最快;这一点,以及在单一栽培和混合栽培中物种生长的比较表明,竞争有助于它在潮湿的草原上占据主导地位。事实上,在两个草原被洪水淹没两年后,米草属植物的样方存在增加了57%,而旱地草的样方存在减少了44%。高的耐涝性、与其他物种的耐旱性差异不显著以及高大的体型表明,广泛的生理耐受性与竞争能力相结合,使其能够跨越草原水分梯度茁壮成长。结论:洪水有助于形成优势草原牧草的分布,并且随着极端降雨事件的持续增加,其影响可能变得更加重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信