Like, share, and follow!: Usage of social media by pathology residency programs in the COVID-19 era.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Katsiaryna Khatskevich, Clare F Hartman, Joon Cha, Angela Nguyen, Ashley Mason, Rahul Mhaskar, Tiffany G Baker
{"title":"Like, share, and follow!: Usage of social media by pathology residency programs in the COVID-19 era.","authors":"Katsiaryna Khatskevich, Clare F Hartman, Joon Cha, Angela Nguyen, Ashley Mason, Rahul Mhaskar, Tiffany G Baker","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Social media platforms like Facebook, X (formally Twitter), and Instagram bridge pathology programs with other health professionals, prospective students, and the public, but the extent of social media usage by residency programs remains unexplored. This study investigates the current landscape of social media utilization by pathology programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Match Data from 2022, 139 anatomic and clinical pathology residency programs were analyzed and categorized into 3 prestige tiers based on Doximity ratings. There were 32,067 posts examined between January 2018 and August 2022. Statistical analyses, including analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc analysis, were performed to evaluate likes/views about post type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>X emerged as the most used platform (68%), focusing on pathology education (27.02%). Instagram centered on resident life (25.84%), while Facebook showcased person-specific posts (35.61%). Notably, there was a correlation between program prestige and the number of posts on X and Instagram, with the most prestigious programs posting more frequently than those considered more intermediate or low in prestige rank.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media is vital in connecting pathology programs with various stakeholders. Despite seasonal fluctuations, the overall utilization of social media continues to rise, underscoring its value as a long-term resource for pathology education and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Social media platforms like Facebook, X (formally Twitter), and Instagram bridge pathology programs with other health professionals, prospective students, and the public, but the extent of social media usage by residency programs remains unexplored. This study investigates the current landscape of social media utilization by pathology programs.

Methods: Using the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Match Data from 2022, 139 anatomic and clinical pathology residency programs were analyzed and categorized into 3 prestige tiers based on Doximity ratings. There were 32,067 posts examined between January 2018 and August 2022. Statistical analyses, including analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc analysis, were performed to evaluate likes/views about post type.

Results: X emerged as the most used platform (68%), focusing on pathology education (27.02%). Instagram centered on resident life (25.84%), while Facebook showcased person-specific posts (35.61%). Notably, there was a correlation between program prestige and the number of posts on X and Instagram, with the most prestigious programs posting more frequently than those considered more intermediate or low in prestige rank.

Conclusions: Social media is vital in connecting pathology programs with various stakeholders. Despite seasonal fluctuations, the overall utilization of social media continues to rise, underscoring its value as a long-term resource for pathology education and communication.

点赞、分享和关注!: COVID-19时代病理学住院医师项目对社交媒体的使用。
目的:像Facebook, X(正式的Twitter)和Instagram这样的社交媒体平台将病理学项目与其他健康专业人员,未来的学生和公众联系起来,但住院医师项目使用社交媒体的程度仍未得到探索。本研究通过病理学项目调查了社交媒体使用的现状。方法:利用2022年全国住院医师匹配计划(NRMP)匹配数据,对139个解剖和临床病理学住院医师项目进行分析,并根据邻域度评分将其分为3个威望等级。2018年1月至2022年8月期间,共审查了32067个职位。统计分析,包括方差分析和Tukey诚实显著差异事后分析,评估喜欢/观点的帖子类型。结果:X是使用最多的平台(68%),重点是病理教育(27.02%)。Instagram以居民生活为中心(25.84%),而Facebook则展示个人特定的帖子(35.61%)。值得注意的是,节目声望与X和Instagram上的帖子数量之间存在相关性,最负盛名的节目比那些被认为在声望排名中较低或较低的节目发布的频率更高。结论:社交媒体在将病理学项目与各种利益相关者联系起来方面至关重要。尽管有季节性波动,但社交媒体的整体使用率仍在持续上升,这凸显了其作为病理学教育和传播的长期资源的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信