The comparative efficacy and safety of Tiger II versus judkins catheters in coronary angiogram via the radial artery access: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Acta cardiologica Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1080/00015385.2024.2442799

Ahmed Aljabali, Mohmmad M Alawajneh, Arafat Hammad, Danh Nguyen, Abdel Rahman Alkasabrah, Khaled Abuein, Ahmed M Altibi

{"title":"The comparative efficacy and safety of Tiger II versus judkins catheters in coronary angiogram via the radial artery access: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmed Aljabali, Mohmmad M Alawajneh, Arafat Hammad, Danh Nguyen, Abdel Rahman Alkasabrah, Khaled Abuein, Ahmed M Altibi","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2024.2442799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Trans-radial coronary angiogram (TR-CAG) has gained popularity due to lower complication rates compared to transfemoral access. Operators can use either conventional catheters, such as Judkins, or single dedicated catheters, such as Tiger-II. This meta-analysis compared the safety and efficacy of Tiger-II versus Judkins catheters in TR-CAG.Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through February 2024 for studies comparing Tiger-II and Judkins catheters in TR-CAG. Fixed- and random-effect models pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs). Primary outcomes included fluoroscopy time and contrast volume. Secondary outcomes included procedural time, radiation exposure, procedural success, radial artery vasospasm, and crossover rate.Results: Seven studies with 2879 patients (1799 in Tiger-II and 1080 in Judkins) were included. Tiger-II use significantly reduced fluoroscopy time (SMD = -0.50 min, 95% CI [-0.80, -0.19], p < 0.01), procedural time (MD = -2.00 min, 95% CI [-2.35, -1.66], p < 0.01), and contrast volume (MD = -7.48 ml, 95% CI [-12.66, -2.29], p < 0.01). Radial artery spasm incidence was also lower (OR = 0.30, 95% CI [0.12, 0.75], p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure, procedural success, or crossover rate.Conclusion: Tiger-II catheters offer reduced fluoroscopy time, procedural time, contrast volume, and radial artery spasm rates in TR-CAG.","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cardiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2024.2442799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trans-radial coronary angiogram (TR-CAG) has gained popularity due to lower complication rates compared to transfemoral access. Operators can use either conventional catheters, such as Judkins, or single dedicated catheters, such as Tiger-II. This meta-analysis compared the safety and efficacy of Tiger-II versus Judkins catheters in TR-CAG.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through February 2024 for studies comparing Tiger-II and Judkins catheters in TR-CAG. Fixed- and random-effect models pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs). Primary outcomes included fluoroscopy time and contrast volume. Secondary outcomes included procedural time, radiation exposure, procedural success, radial artery vasospasm, and crossover rate.

Results: Seven studies with 2879 patients (1799 in Tiger-II and 1080 in Judkins) were included. Tiger-II use significantly reduced fluoroscopy time (SMD = -0.50 min, 95% CI [-0.80, -0.19], p < 0.01), procedural time (MD = -2.00 min, 95% CI [-2.35, -1.66], p < 0.01), and contrast volume (MD = -7.48 ml, 95% CI [-12.66, -2.29], p < 0.01). Radial artery spasm incidence was also lower (OR = 0.30, 95% CI [0.12, 0.75], p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure, procedural success, or crossover rate.

Conclusion: Tiger-II catheters offer reduced fluoroscopy time, procedural time, contrast volume, and radial artery spasm rates in TR-CAG.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Acta cardiologica 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

115

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Acta Cardiologica is an international journal. It publishes bi-monthly original, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease including observational studies, clinical trials, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance and tutorials.