Effects of Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength on Subjective Function and Motor Performance of Knees After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Q4 Medicine
Ming-Ze Liu, Xiao-Han Zhang, Lei Li, Jing-Yi Sun, Yi Qian, Chen He, Sen Guo, Hao Xu, Ya-Wei Gong, Zhuang Liu, Xiang-Yi Wang, Feng Gao, Jing-Bin Zhou
{"title":"Effects of Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength on Subjective Function and Motor Performance of Knees After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Ming-Ze Liu, Xiao-Han Zhang, Lei Li, Jing-Yi Sun, Yi Qian, Chen He, Sen Guo, Hao Xu, Ya-Wei Gong, Zhuang Liu, Xiang-Yi Wang, Feng Gao, Jing-Bin Zhou","doi":"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To evaluate the effects of knee flexor and extensor strength on the subjective function and motor performance of knees after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods A total of 53 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the National Institute of Sports Medicine,General Administration of Sport of China from June 2015 to June 2021 and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study.The patients were followed up time for at least 2 years.An isometric muscle strength test system was used to measure the strength of bilateral quadriceps and hamstring muscles.The patients were grouped according to whether the limb symmetry index (LSI) of peak torque of quadriceps and hamstring muscle reached 85% at an angular velocity of 60°/s.Specifically,26 patients were classified into group A (LSI≥85%) and 27 patients were classified into group B (LSI<85%).The subjective function and motor performance of knees were compared between the two groups. Results In terms of subjective function of knees,the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score (88.76±9.93 <i>vs.</i> 81.08±12.57,<i>P</i>=0.017) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) (86.27±8.96 <i>vs.</i> 80.22±11.31,<i>P</i>=0.036) were different between groups A and B.There was no significant difference in Lysholm score [95.0 (79.8,100.00) <i>vs.</i> 86.00 (66.00,100.00),<i>P</i>=0.238],ACL return to sports after injury scale score (66.08±22.25 <i>vs.</i> 61.12±23.53,<i>P</i>=0.434),Marx score [6.00 (4.75,7.00) <i>vs.</i> 6.00 (4.00,7.00),<i>P</i>=0.805] or Tegner activity score [8.00 (4.00,12.00) <i>vs.</i> 4.00 (2.00,12.00),<i>P</i>=0.566] between the two groups.In terms of motor performance,the single-leg triple hop LSI (0.92±0.13 <i>vs.</i> 0.81±0.18,<i>P</i>=0.016) and single-leg crossover hop LSI (0.96±0.12 <i>vs.</i> 0.84±0.22,<i>P</i>=0.021) showed significant differences between groups A and B,while there was no significant difference in single-leg hop LSI (0.90±0.18 <i>vs.</i> 0.79±0.25,<i>P</i>=0.116) between the two groups.In addition,there was no statistical significance in proprioception [30°:8.83±4.66 <i>vs.</i> 10.73±4.63,<i>P</i>=0.143;45°:6.94±3.82 <i>vs.</i> 7.66±3.93,<i>P</i>=0.504;60°:4.10 (3.20,4.72) <i>vs.</i> 3.90 (2.30,5.20),<i>P</i>=0.493] or Y-balance test results [anterior LSI:0.98 (0.84,1.02) <i>vs.</i> 0.94 (0.86,0.98),<i>P</i>=0.328;posterolateral LSI:1.00±0.08 <i>vs.</i> 0.97±0.07,<i>P</i>=0.249;posteromedial LSI:1.00 (0.97,1.03) <i>vs.</i> 0.96 (0.93,1.03),<i>P</i>=0.179] between groups A and B. Conclusion The patients with good symmetry of quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction had better subjective function and movement performance of knees than the patients with poor symmetry,which was mainly reflected in the IKDC score,KOOS,single-leg triple hop,and single-leg crossover hop.</p>","PeriodicalId":6919,"journal":{"name":"中国医学科学院学报","volume":"46 6","pages":"805-813"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医学科学院学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of knee flexor and extensor strength on the subjective function and motor performance of knees after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods A total of 53 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the National Institute of Sports Medicine,General Administration of Sport of China from June 2015 to June 2021 and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study.The patients were followed up time for at least 2 years.An isometric muscle strength test system was used to measure the strength of bilateral quadriceps and hamstring muscles.The patients were grouped according to whether the limb symmetry index (LSI) of peak torque of quadriceps and hamstring muscle reached 85% at an angular velocity of 60°/s.Specifically,26 patients were classified into group A (LSI≥85%) and 27 patients were classified into group B (LSI<85%).The subjective function and motor performance of knees were compared between the two groups. Results In terms of subjective function of knees,the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score (88.76±9.93 vs. 81.08±12.57,P=0.017) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) (86.27±8.96 vs. 80.22±11.31,P=0.036) were different between groups A and B.There was no significant difference in Lysholm score [95.0 (79.8,100.00) vs. 86.00 (66.00,100.00),P=0.238],ACL return to sports after injury scale score (66.08±22.25 vs. 61.12±23.53,P=0.434),Marx score [6.00 (4.75,7.00) vs. 6.00 (4.00,7.00),P=0.805] or Tegner activity score [8.00 (4.00,12.00) vs. 4.00 (2.00,12.00),P=0.566] between the two groups.In terms of motor performance,the single-leg triple hop LSI (0.92±0.13 vs. 0.81±0.18,P=0.016) and single-leg crossover hop LSI (0.96±0.12 vs. 0.84±0.22,P=0.021) showed significant differences between groups A and B,while there was no significant difference in single-leg hop LSI (0.90±0.18 vs. 0.79±0.25,P=0.116) between the two groups.In addition,there was no statistical significance in proprioception [30°:8.83±4.66 vs. 10.73±4.63,P=0.143;45°:6.94±3.82 vs. 7.66±3.93,P=0.504;60°:4.10 (3.20,4.72) vs. 3.90 (2.30,5.20),P=0.493] or Y-balance test results [anterior LSI:0.98 (0.84,1.02) vs. 0.94 (0.86,0.98),P=0.328;posterolateral LSI:1.00±0.08 vs. 0.97±0.07,P=0.249;posteromedial LSI:1.00 (0.97,1.03) vs. 0.96 (0.93,1.03),P=0.179] between groups A and B. Conclusion The patients with good symmetry of quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction had better subjective function and movement performance of knees than the patients with poor symmetry,which was mainly reflected in the IKDC score,KOOS,single-leg triple hop,and single-leg crossover hop.

前交叉韧带重建后膝关节屈伸肌力对膝关节主观功能和运动性能的影响。
目的探讨前交叉韧带重建后膝关节屈伸肌力对膝关节主观功能和运动性能的影响。方法选取2015年6月至2021年6月在中国体育总局国家运动医学研究所行前交叉韧带重建术的患者53例,符合入选标准。随访时间至少2年。采用等长肌力测试系统测量双侧股四头肌和腘绳肌的肌力。在60°/s角速度下,根据股四头肌和腘绳肌峰值扭矩肢体对称指数(LSI)是否达到85%进行分组。其中,26例患者被分为A组(LSI≥85%),27例患者被分为B组(LSIvs)。81.08±12.57,P = 0.017)和骨关节炎膝盖受伤,结果分数(三星)(86.27±8.96和80.22±11.31,P = 0.036)不同团体之间,B.There Lysholm分数的差异不显著(95.0(79.8,100.00)和86.00 (66.00,100.00),P = 0.238), ACL回归运动受伤后量表得分(66.08±22.25和61.12±23.53,P = 0.434),马克思得分(6.00(4.75,7.00)和6.00 (4.00,7.00),P = 0.805)或Tegner活动得分(8.00(4.00,12.00)和4.00 (2.00,12.00),P = 0.566),两组之间。在运动性能方面,单腿三跳LSI(0.92±0.13 vs. 0.81±0.18,P=0.016)和单腿跨跳LSI(0.96±0.12 vs. 0.84±0.22,P=0.021)在A组和B组之间有显著差异,而单腿跨跳LSI(0.90±0.18 vs. 0.79±0.25,P=0.116)在两组之间无显著差异。此外,在本体感觉没有统计学意义(30°:8.83±4.66和10.73±4.63,P = 0.143; 45°:6.94±3.82和7.66±3.93,P = 0.504; 60°:4.10(3.20,4.72)和3.90 (2.30,5.20),P = 0.493)或Y-balance测试结果(前大规模集成电路:0.98(0.84,1.02)和0.94 (0.86,0.98),P = 0.328;后外侧的大规模集成电路:1.00±0.08和0.97±0.07,P = 0.249;后中的大规模集成电路:1.00(0.97,1.03)和0.96 (0.93,1.03),P = 0.179)组A和b之间结论患者股四头肌和腿部肌肉的好对称对比对称性差的患者,前交叉韧带重建后力量组患者的膝关节主观功能和运动表现更好,主要体现在IKDC评分、oos、单腿三跳、单腿交叉跳等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国医学科学院学报
中国医学科学院学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6813
期刊介绍: Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae was founded in February 1979. It is a comprehensive medical academic journal published in China and abroad, supervised by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The journal mainly reports the latest research results, work progress and dynamics in the fields of basic medicine, clinical medicine, pharmacy, preventive medicine, biomedicine, medical teaching and research, aiming to promote the exchange of medical information and improve the academic level of medicine. At present, the journal has been included in 10 famous foreign retrieval systems and their databases [Medline (PubMed online version), Elsevier, EMBASE, CA, WPRIM, ExtraMED, IC, JST, UPD and EBSCO-ASP]; and has been included in important domestic retrieval systems and databases [China Science Citation Database (Documentation and Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), China Core Journals Overview (Peking University Library), China Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Database (China Science and Technology Core Journals) (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information), China Science and Technology Journal Paper and Citation Database (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信