Differentiation between renal cell carcinoma metastases to the pancreas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with renal cell carcinoma on CT or MRI.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Marie-Joy Nduwimana, Ceylan Colak, Cem Bilgin, Blake A Kassmeyer, Candice M Bolan, Christine O Menias, Sudhakar K Venkatesh
{"title":"Differentiation between renal cell carcinoma metastases to the pancreas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with renal cell carcinoma on CT or MRI.","authors":"Marie-Joy Nduwimana, Ceylan Colak, Cem Bilgin, Blake A Kassmeyer, Candice M Bolan, Christine O Menias, Sudhakar K Venkatesh","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04787-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether renal cell carcinoma metastases (RCC-Mets) to the pancreas can be differentiated from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in patients with RCC on CT or MRI at presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with biopsy-proven RCC-Mets (n = 102) or PNETs (n = 32) at diagnosis or after nephrectomy for RCC. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was assessed in 95 patients with independent reads by two radiologists, with discrepancies resolved by consensus for final analysis. The remaining 39 cases underwent consensus reads by two different radiologists for final analysis. The CT/MRI images were reviewed for number, size, regional distribution, parenchymal location (exophytic or intrapancreatic), contrast-enhancement, and enhancement pattern of pancreatic lesions in the available phases. Statistical tests were conducted using two sample t-tests and Pearson's chi-squared test for numeric and categorical variables respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group comprised of 134 patients (90 males) with 265 lesions (229 RCC-Mets and 36 PNETs). Patients with PNETs were significantly younger (62 ± 12 years vs. 67 ± 9 years, p = 0.013). Inter-observer agreement for CT/MRI features was excellent across multiple imaging variables (k = 0.86-1.00). Most PNETs were single lesions (88 vs. 63%, p = 0.008), smaller in size (14 mm vs. 23 mm, p = 0.042), more common in the body and tail (81 vs. 57%, p = 0.01), showed homogeneous contrast enhancement (64-79% vs. 39-49%, p < 0.01-0.03), less T1-hypointense (80 vs. 99%, p = 0.002) and more DWI hyperintense (71 vs. 58%, p < 0.001) compared to RCC-Mets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNETs are typically single, occur in distal pancreas, and enhance homogeneously compared to RCC-Mets which are often multiple, occur in the proximal pancreas, and enhance heterogeneously.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04787-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether renal cell carcinoma metastases (RCC-Mets) to the pancreas can be differentiated from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in patients with RCC on CT or MRI at presentation.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with biopsy-proven RCC-Mets (n = 102) or PNETs (n = 32) at diagnosis or after nephrectomy for RCC. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was assessed in 95 patients with independent reads by two radiologists, with discrepancies resolved by consensus for final analysis. The remaining 39 cases underwent consensus reads by two different radiologists for final analysis. The CT/MRI images were reviewed for number, size, regional distribution, parenchymal location (exophytic or intrapancreatic), contrast-enhancement, and enhancement pattern of pancreatic lesions in the available phases. Statistical tests were conducted using two sample t-tests and Pearson's chi-squared test for numeric and categorical variables respectively.

Results: The study group comprised of 134 patients (90 males) with 265 lesions (229 RCC-Mets and 36 PNETs). Patients with PNETs were significantly younger (62 ± 12 years vs. 67 ± 9 years, p = 0.013). Inter-observer agreement for CT/MRI features was excellent across multiple imaging variables (k = 0.86-1.00). Most PNETs were single lesions (88 vs. 63%, p = 0.008), smaller in size (14 mm vs. 23 mm, p = 0.042), more common in the body and tail (81 vs. 57%, p = 0.01), showed homogeneous contrast enhancement (64-79% vs. 39-49%, p < 0.01-0.03), less T1-hypointense (80 vs. 99%, p = 0.002) and more DWI hyperintense (71 vs. 58%, p < 0.001) compared to RCC-Mets.

Conclusion: PNETs are typically single, occur in distal pancreas, and enhance homogeneously compared to RCC-Mets which are often multiple, occur in the proximal pancreas, and enhance heterogeneously.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信