Meat yields and primal cut weights from beef carcasses can be predicted with similar accuracies using in-abattoir 3D measurements or EUROP classification grade.

IF 7.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Holly Nisbet, Nicola Lambe, Gemma A Miller, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson, David Barclay, Alexander Wheaton, Carol-Anne Duthie
{"title":"Meat yields and primal cut weights from beef carcasses can be predicted with similar accuracies using in-abattoir 3D measurements or EUROP classification grade.","authors":"Holly Nisbet, Nicola Lambe, Gemma A Miller, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson, David Barclay, Alexander Wheaton, Carol-Anne Duthie","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three-dimensional (3D) measurements extracted from beef carcass images were used to predict the weight of four saleable meat yield (SMY) traits (total SMY and the SMY of the forequarter, flank, and hindquarter) and four primal cuts (sirloin, ribeye, topside and rump). Data were collected at two UK abattoirs using time-of-flight cameras and manual bone out methods. Predictions were made for 484 carcasses, using multiple linear regression (MLR) or machine learning (ML) techniques. Model inputs included breed type, sex, and abattoir as fixed effects, and cold carcass weight, visually assessed EUROP fat and conformation classes, and 3D measurements as covariates. Machine learning techniques were only used for models including 3D measurements. The CCW and fixed effects resulted in high accuracy (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.90, RMSE = 2.12-3.96 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.56-0.67, RMSE = 0.36-0.91 kg), and including the EUROP covariates increased accuracies (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75-0.96, RMSE = 2.00-3.11 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58-0.79, RMSE = 0.36-0.79 kg). The 3D measurement covariates and abattoir resulted in moderate accuracy (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.39-0.58, RMSE = 3.26-10.31 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.33-0.52, RMSE = 0.44-1.14 kg) and high accuracy when combined with CCW and all fixed effects (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.95, RMSE = 1.81-3.42 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52-0.74, RMSE = 0.40-0.81 kg). The best ML models resulted in similar accuracies to the MLR models. Models including 3D measurements produced similar accuracies to models built using conventional data recorded at the abattoir, indicting the potential for automated prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"222 ","pages":"109738"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) measurements extracted from beef carcass images were used to predict the weight of four saleable meat yield (SMY) traits (total SMY and the SMY of the forequarter, flank, and hindquarter) and four primal cuts (sirloin, ribeye, topside and rump). Data were collected at two UK abattoirs using time-of-flight cameras and manual bone out methods. Predictions were made for 484 carcasses, using multiple linear regression (MLR) or machine learning (ML) techniques. Model inputs included breed type, sex, and abattoir as fixed effects, and cold carcass weight, visually assessed EUROP fat and conformation classes, and 3D measurements as covariates. Machine learning techniques were only used for models including 3D measurements. The CCW and fixed effects resulted in high accuracy (SMY R2 = 0.72-0.90, RMSE = 2.12-3.96 kg, primal R2 = 0.56-0.67, RMSE = 0.36-0.91 kg), and including the EUROP covariates increased accuracies (SMY R2 = 0.75-0.96, RMSE = 2.00-3.11 kg, primal R2 = 0.58-0.79, RMSE = 0.36-0.79 kg). The 3D measurement covariates and abattoir resulted in moderate accuracy (SMY MLR R2 = 0.39-0.58, RMSE = 3.26-10.31 kg, primal MLR R2 = 0.33-0.52, RMSE = 0.44-1.14 kg) and high accuracy when combined with CCW and all fixed effects (SMY MLR R2 = 0.72-0.95, RMSE = 1.81-3.42 kg, primal MLR R2 = 0.52-0.74, RMSE = 0.40-0.81 kg). The best ML models resulted in similar accuracies to the MLR models. Models including 3D measurements produced similar accuracies to models built using conventional data recorded at the abattoir, indicting the potential for automated prediction.

肉类产量和牛肉胴体的原始切割重量可以使用屠宰场内3D测量或EUROP分类等级以类似的精度预测。
从牛肉胴体图像中提取的三维(3D)测量数据用于预测四种可售肉产量(SMY)性状(总SMY以及前躯、侧腹和后躯的SMY)和四种主要部位(牛里脊、肋眼、上躯和臀部)的重量。数据是在英国的两个屠宰场用飞行时间照相机和人工剔骨方法收集的。使用多元线性回归(MLR)或机器学习(ML)技术对484具尸体进行了预测。模型输入包括品种类型、性别和屠宰场作为固定影响因素,冷胴体重、目测EUROP脂肪和构象等级,以及三维测量作为协变量。机器学习技术仅用于包括3D测量在内的模型。CCW和固定效应具有较高的准确度(SMY R2 = 0.72 ~ 0.90, RMSE = 2.12 ~ 3.96 kg,原始R2 = 0.56 ~ 0.67, RMSE = 0.36 ~ 0.91 kg),而包含EUROP协变量则提高了准确度(SMY R2 = 0.75 ~ 0.96, RMSE = 2.00 ~ 3.11 kg,原始R2 = 0.58 ~ 0.79, RMSE = 0.36 ~ 0.79 kg)。三维测量协变量和屠宰场的准确度中等(smmy MLR R2 = 0.39 ~ 0.58, RMSE = 3.26 ~ 10.31 kg,原始MLR R2 = 0.33 ~ 0.52, RMSE = 0.44 ~ 1.14 kg),与CCW和所有固定效应联合使用时准确度较高(smmy MLR R2 = 0.72 ~ 0.95, RMSE = 1.81 ~ 3.42 kg,原始MLR R2 = 0.52 ~ 0.74, RMSE = 0.40 ~ 0.81 kg)。最好的ML模型产生了与MLR模型相似的精度。包括3D测量在内的模型产生的精度与使用屠宰场记录的传统数据建立的模型相似,表明自动化预测的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meat Science
Meat Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
282
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信