A cross-sectional study of differences in medication for opioid use disorder receipt among pregnant people enrolled in Medicaid in Oregon, United States.

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/add.16752
Camille C Cioffi, Ann Martinez Acevedo, Deborah J Cohen, Menolly R Kaufman, Kea Parker, Mishka Terplan, Stephan R Lindner
{"title":"A cross-sectional study of differences in medication for opioid use disorder receipt among pregnant people enrolled in Medicaid in Oregon, United States.","authors":"Camille C Cioffi, Ann Martinez Acevedo, Deborah J Cohen, Menolly R Kaufman, Kea Parker, Mishka Terplan, Stephan R Lindner","doi":"10.1111/add.16752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Medication is the gold standard to support a healthy pregnancy for pregnant people with opioid use disorder (OUD). This study measured inequities and differences in OUD medication treatment among pregnant people in Oregon, USA.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants and measurements: </strong>Our study population consisted of Medicaid enrollees across the US state of Oregon who had at least one live hospital birth between 2012 and 2020 and one diagnosis of OUD prenatally (n = 4363). We measured differences in demographic characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, location) among those with and without medication for OUD in the prenatal through 3-months postpartum period (any medication use, and by type), and compared exclusive methadone versus buprenorphine receipt. We report unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Adjusted odds ratios for medication for OUD were lower among American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people compared with White pregnant people [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42, 0.83)], younger pregnant people compared with those aged 30-34 years [aOR, ages 15-19: 0.1 (95 CI = 0.06, 0.18); aOR, ages 20-24: 0.58 (95 CI = 0.49, 0.69)] and rural pregnant people compared with those in urban communities [aOR 0.58 (95 CI = 0.5-0.67)]. Rural pregnant people with OUD also had lower odds of methadone receipt [aOR 0.23 (95 CI = 0.17, 0.3)] and higher odds of buprenorphine receipt [aOR 3.99 (95 CI = 2.97, 5.35)] than other people in this study. Among those who received medication, Black pregnant people had increased odds of receiving methadone compared with buprenorphine [aOR 2.09 (95 CI = 1.1-3.97)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Oregon, USA, inequities in receipt of any medication for opioid use disorder were observed among pregnant people who identified as American Indian or Alaska Native, younger than 25, and living in rural communities. Black pregnant people in Oregon, USA, were more likely to receive methadone than buprenorphine.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16752","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Medication is the gold standard to support a healthy pregnancy for pregnant people with opioid use disorder (OUD). This study measured inequities and differences in OUD medication treatment among pregnant people in Oregon, USA.

Design, setting, participants and measurements: Our study population consisted of Medicaid enrollees across the US state of Oregon who had at least one live hospital birth between 2012 and 2020 and one diagnosis of OUD prenatally (n = 4363). We measured differences in demographic characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, location) among those with and without medication for OUD in the prenatal through 3-months postpartum period (any medication use, and by type), and compared exclusive methadone versus buprenorphine receipt. We report unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios.

Findings: Adjusted odds ratios for medication for OUD were lower among American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people compared with White pregnant people [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42, 0.83)], younger pregnant people compared with those aged 30-34 years [aOR, ages 15-19: 0.1 (95 CI = 0.06, 0.18); aOR, ages 20-24: 0.58 (95 CI = 0.49, 0.69)] and rural pregnant people compared with those in urban communities [aOR 0.58 (95 CI = 0.5-0.67)]. Rural pregnant people with OUD also had lower odds of methadone receipt [aOR 0.23 (95 CI = 0.17, 0.3)] and higher odds of buprenorphine receipt [aOR 3.99 (95 CI = 2.97, 5.35)] than other people in this study. Among those who received medication, Black pregnant people had increased odds of receiving methadone compared with buprenorphine [aOR 2.09 (95 CI = 1.1-3.97)].

Conclusions: In Oregon, USA, inequities in receipt of any medication for opioid use disorder were observed among pregnant people who identified as American Indian or Alaska Native, younger than 25, and living in rural communities. Black pregnant people in Oregon, USA, were more likely to receive methadone than buprenorphine.

在美国俄勒冈州参加医疗补助计划的孕妇中,阿片类药物使用障碍药物收据差异的横断面研究。
背景和目的:药物治疗是支持阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)孕妇健康妊娠的金标准。本研究测量了美国俄勒冈州孕妇OUD药物治疗的不公平和差异。设计、设置、参与者和测量:我们的研究人群包括美国俄勒冈州医疗补助计划的参保者,他们在2012年至2020年期间至少有一次活产,产前诊断为OUD (n = 4363)。我们测量了在产前至产后3个月期间(任何药物使用和类型)接受和未接受OUD药物治疗的患者的人口统计学特征(年龄、种族、民族、地区)的差异,并比较了单独接受美沙酮和丁丙诺啡的差异。我们报告未调整和调整的优势比。结果:与白人孕妇相比,美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民孕妇治疗OUD的调整优势比更低[调整优势比(aOR) 0.59(95%可信区间[CI] = 0.42, 0.83)],年轻孕妇与30-34岁孕妇相比[aOR, 15-19岁:0.1 (95 CI = 0.06, 0.18);aOR, 20-24岁:0.58 (95 CI = 0.49, 0.69)],农村孕妇与城市社区孕妇相比[aOR = 0.58 (95 CI = 0.5-0.67)]。农村孕妇OUD患者接受美沙酮的几率低于其他人群[aOR = 0.23 (95 CI = 0.17, 0.3)],接受丁丙诺啡的几率高于其他人群[aOR = 3.99 (95 CI = 2.97, 5.35)]。在接受药物治疗的孕妇中,黑人孕妇接受美沙酮的几率高于丁丙诺啡[比值比2.09 (95 CI = 1.1-3.97)]。结论:在美国俄勒冈州,居住在农村社区的25岁以下的美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民孕妇在接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗方面存在不公平现象。美国俄勒冈州的黑人孕妇接受美沙酮治疗的可能性大于丁丙诺啡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信