A network analysis of rumination on loneliness and the relationship with depression

Jingyi Luo, Nichol M. L. Wong, Ruibin Zhang, Jingsong Wu, Robin Shao, Chetwyn C. H. Chan, Tatia M. C. Lee
{"title":"A network analysis of rumination on loneliness and the relationship with depression","authors":"Jingyi Luo, Nichol M. L. Wong, Ruibin Zhang, Jingsong Wu, Robin Shao, Chetwyn C. H. Chan, Tatia M. C. Lee","doi":"10.1038/s44220-024-00350-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous literature has suggested a significant association between loneliness and depression. Importantly, research has shown that rumination can modulate the loneliness–depression relationship. However, most studies only treated loneliness, rumination or depression as unitary constructs. Considering the heterogeneity of the three concepts, we examined the relationship between specific loneliness, rumination items and depressive symptoms using the network analysis approach. In a large community adult sample (N = 900), we constructed the loneliness–depression and loneliness–rumination–depression network using a cross-sectional design. The results suggested that loneliness has no robust association with depressive symptoms. Instead, a connection between a specific ruminative thought (‘think about how alone you are’) and a specific loneliness item (‘how often do you feel alone’) is essential in maintaining the loneliness–rumination–depression network (partial r = 0.307). Our findings indicate that ruminating on the feeling of loneliness is the key underlying factor modulating the loneliness–depression relationship. Interventions for depression should focus on ameliorating ruminative thoughts, especially on loneliness feelings. In a network analysis investigating associations among loneliness, rumination and depressive symptoms, the authors find that ruminating specifically on loneliness modulated the relationship between loneliness and depression.","PeriodicalId":74247,"journal":{"name":"Nature mental health","volume":"3 1","pages":"46-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00350-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00350-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous literature has suggested a significant association between loneliness and depression. Importantly, research has shown that rumination can modulate the loneliness–depression relationship. However, most studies only treated loneliness, rumination or depression as unitary constructs. Considering the heterogeneity of the three concepts, we examined the relationship between specific loneliness, rumination items and depressive symptoms using the network analysis approach. In a large community adult sample (N = 900), we constructed the loneliness–depression and loneliness–rumination–depression network using a cross-sectional design. The results suggested that loneliness has no robust association with depressive symptoms. Instead, a connection between a specific ruminative thought (‘think about how alone you are’) and a specific loneliness item (‘how often do you feel alone’) is essential in maintaining the loneliness–rumination–depression network (partial r = 0.307). Our findings indicate that ruminating on the feeling of loneliness is the key underlying factor modulating the loneliness–depression relationship. Interventions for depression should focus on ameliorating ruminative thoughts, especially on loneliness feelings. In a network analysis investigating associations among loneliness, rumination and depressive symptoms, the authors find that ruminating specifically on loneliness modulated the relationship between loneliness and depression.

Abstract Image

孤独反刍与抑郁关系的网络分析
以前的文献表明孤独和抑郁之间存在显著的联系。重要的是,研究表明,沉思可以调节孤独与抑郁的关系。然而,大多数研究只将孤独、沉思或抑郁作为单一的结构。考虑到这三个概念的异质性,我们使用网络分析方法研究了特定孤独、反刍项目和抑郁症状之间的关系。在一个大型社区成人样本中(N = 900),我们使用横断面设计构建了孤独-抑郁和孤独-沉思-抑郁网络。结果表明,孤独与抑郁症状没有明显的联系。相反,一个特定的沉思想法(“想想你有多孤独”)和一个特定的孤独项目(“你多久感到孤独”)之间的联系对于维持孤独-沉思-抑郁网络至关重要(部分r = 0.307)。我们的研究结果表明,对孤独感的反思是调节孤独-抑郁关系的关键潜在因素。对抑郁症的干预应侧重于改善沉思的想法,尤其是孤独感。在一项调查孤独、沉思和抑郁症状之间关系的网络分析中,作者发现,对孤独的沉思调节了孤独和抑郁之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信