Comparative analysis of milk casein hydrolysates from cow, water buffalo, goat and sheep: effects of flavourzyme and neutrase on formation of bioactive peptides
{"title":"Comparative analysis of milk casein hydrolysates from cow, water buffalo, goat and sheep: effects of flavourzyme and neutrase on formation of bioactive peptides","authors":"Abdullah Mohammed Naji, Mustafa Çam","doi":"10.1007/s11694-024-02972-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The casein hydrolysates of cow (CwC), water buffalo (WBuC), goat (GoC), and sheep (ShC) were obtained using neutrase (CwCN, BuCN, GoCN, and ShCN) and flavourzyme (CwCF, BuCF, GoCF, and ShCF). Untreated caseins and their respective enzyme (flavourzyme and neutrase) treated hydrolysates were compared in terms of selected bioactivities, free amino acids, and molecular weight distributions, etc. The enzymes displayed varied activities for 4 casein types. Flavourzyme was more aggressive than neutrase in the formation of peptides and free amino acids. The highest and the lowest degree of hydrolysis were determined for GoCF (166.8 mg tryptone /g casein) and ShCN (37.4 mg tryptone /g casein), respectively. Both enzymes significantly reduced the molecular weights of peptides in hydrolysates. The higher amounts of free amino acids were determined in flavourzyme treated caseins compared to neutrase treated ones; the highest was in ShCF (92.89 mg amino acid/g casein). The polypeptide ratio in ShC was 78.3%, but after treatment with flavourzyme and neutrase, the polypeptide ratio in hydrolysates were diminished to 23.5 and 25.3%, respectively, for ShCF and ShCN. The highest proportion of peptides in hydrolysates were oligopeptides (between 0.5 and 2.5 kDa), ranging from 67 to 76.7% for 8 enzyme treated caseins. FTIR spectra indicated modifications in caseins in amide I and II bands. Compared to their respective enzyme treated hydrolysates, the untreated caseins (CoC, WBuC, GoC, and ShC) displayed higher lipase inhibition activities (GoC having the highest inhibition, 66.34%). In the case of α-amylase inhibition, flavourzyme generated higher results for WBuCF (91.09%) and CwCF (86.96%) than their neutrase treated analogs. On the other hand, neutrase generated higher results for GoCN (67.3%) and ShCN (55.77%) than their flavourzyme treated analogs. Regarding ACE inhibition activity, GoCN and WBuCF displayed the highest results as 93.3% and 80.32%, respectively. The study demonstrated the promising potential of casein hydrolysates from different sources for the formulation of functional foods to combat chronic diseases including hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, obesity, and hypertension.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","volume":"19 1","pages":"341 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11694-024-02972-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The casein hydrolysates of cow (CwC), water buffalo (WBuC), goat (GoC), and sheep (ShC) were obtained using neutrase (CwCN, BuCN, GoCN, and ShCN) and flavourzyme (CwCF, BuCF, GoCF, and ShCF). Untreated caseins and their respective enzyme (flavourzyme and neutrase) treated hydrolysates were compared in terms of selected bioactivities, free amino acids, and molecular weight distributions, etc. The enzymes displayed varied activities for 4 casein types. Flavourzyme was more aggressive than neutrase in the formation of peptides and free amino acids. The highest and the lowest degree of hydrolysis were determined for GoCF (166.8 mg tryptone /g casein) and ShCN (37.4 mg tryptone /g casein), respectively. Both enzymes significantly reduced the molecular weights of peptides in hydrolysates. The higher amounts of free amino acids were determined in flavourzyme treated caseins compared to neutrase treated ones; the highest was in ShCF (92.89 mg amino acid/g casein). The polypeptide ratio in ShC was 78.3%, but after treatment with flavourzyme and neutrase, the polypeptide ratio in hydrolysates were diminished to 23.5 and 25.3%, respectively, for ShCF and ShCN. The highest proportion of peptides in hydrolysates were oligopeptides (between 0.5 and 2.5 kDa), ranging from 67 to 76.7% for 8 enzyme treated caseins. FTIR spectra indicated modifications in caseins in amide I and II bands. Compared to their respective enzyme treated hydrolysates, the untreated caseins (CoC, WBuC, GoC, and ShC) displayed higher lipase inhibition activities (GoC having the highest inhibition, 66.34%). In the case of α-amylase inhibition, flavourzyme generated higher results for WBuCF (91.09%) and CwCF (86.96%) than their neutrase treated analogs. On the other hand, neutrase generated higher results for GoCN (67.3%) and ShCN (55.77%) than their flavourzyme treated analogs. Regarding ACE inhibition activity, GoCN and WBuCF displayed the highest results as 93.3% and 80.32%, respectively. The study demonstrated the promising potential of casein hydrolysates from different sources for the formulation of functional foods to combat chronic diseases including hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, obesity, and hypertension.
期刊介绍:
This interdisciplinary journal publishes new measurement results, characteristic properties, differentiating patterns, measurement methods and procedures for such purposes as food process innovation, product development, quality control, and safety assurance.
The journal encompasses all topics related to food property measurement and characterization, including all types of measured properties of food and food materials, features and patterns, measurement principles and techniques, development and evaluation of technologies, novel uses and applications, and industrial implementation of systems and procedures.