Comprehensive analysis of phytochemical extraction of betalains from Beta vulgaris L. pomace using conventional, enzyme-assisted and ultrasonic-assisted methods

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Akashdeep Kaur, Gargi Ghoshal
{"title":"Comprehensive analysis of phytochemical extraction of betalains from Beta vulgaris L. pomace using conventional, enzyme-assisted and ultrasonic-assisted methods","authors":"Akashdeep Kaur,&nbsp;Gargi Ghoshal","doi":"10.1007/s11694-024-02997-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Beetroot pomace, rich in bioactive components, offers versatile applications in betalain extraction through various methodologies, including ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE), conventional extraction (CE), and enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE). In CE, accurately weighed pomace powder (PP) was homogenized with deionized water, forming slurry which underwent conventional heating at 30–60 °C for 20–60 min. EAE involved mixing pomace powder with xylanase enzyme and distilled water under various time-temperature conditions. UAE utilized amplitudes of 20, 30 and 40% for durations ranging from 10 to 60 min. The comparison of UAE, EAE and CE methods demonstrated that UAE exhibited elevated levels of betalains, total phenols, flavonoids, minerals and total antioxidants, which were confirmed through FTIR, LCMS and SEM analyses. Optimizing UAE conditions significantly enhanced phytochemical extraction from beetroot pomace, with betacyanins, betaxanthins and total betalains increasing by 54, 11 and 36%, respectively, compared to EAE and CE. Total phenols (193.26 mg GAE/g) and antioxidant activity (53.23%) were also notably higher, demonstrating UAE’s superior extraction efficacy. SEM analysis confirmed enhanced porosity in UAE-treated pomace, supporting its efficient utilization. Conclusion, UAE demonstrates superior extraction efficacy over EAE and CE methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","volume":"19 1","pages":"656 - 670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11694-024-02997-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beetroot pomace, rich in bioactive components, offers versatile applications in betalain extraction through various methodologies, including ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE), conventional extraction (CE), and enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE). In CE, accurately weighed pomace powder (PP) was homogenized with deionized water, forming slurry which underwent conventional heating at 30–60 °C for 20–60 min. EAE involved mixing pomace powder with xylanase enzyme and distilled water under various time-temperature conditions. UAE utilized amplitudes of 20, 30 and 40% for durations ranging from 10 to 60 min. The comparison of UAE, EAE and CE methods demonstrated that UAE exhibited elevated levels of betalains, total phenols, flavonoids, minerals and total antioxidants, which were confirmed through FTIR, LCMS and SEM analyses. Optimizing UAE conditions significantly enhanced phytochemical extraction from beetroot pomace, with betacyanins, betaxanthins and total betalains increasing by 54, 11 and 36%, respectively, compared to EAE and CE. Total phenols (193.26 mg GAE/g) and antioxidant activity (53.23%) were also notably higher, demonstrating UAE’s superior extraction efficacy. SEM analysis confirmed enhanced porosity in UAE-treated pomace, supporting its efficient utilization. Conclusion, UAE demonstrates superior extraction efficacy over EAE and CE methods.

Abstract Image

采用常规法、酶辅助法和超声辅助法对甜菜渣中甜菜素的植物化学提取进行综合分析
甜菜根渣富含生物活性成分,通过各种方法,包括超声辅助提取(UAE),常规提取(CE)和酶辅助提取(EAE),在甜菜素提取中提供了多种应用。在CE中,精确称重的渣渣粉(PP)用去离子水均质,形成浆料,在30-60℃下常规加热20-60 min。EAE是将渣渣粉与木聚糖酶和蒸馏水在不同的时间温度条件下混合。阿联酋利用了20、30和40%的振幅,持续时间从10到60分钟不等。阿联酋、EAE和CE方法的比较表明,阿联酋表现出β素、总酚类、类黄酮、矿物质和总抗氧化剂的水平升高,这一点通过FTIR、LCMS和SEM分析得到了证实。优化UAE条件可显著提高甜菜根渣的植物化学成分提取率,与EAE和CE相比,甜菜青素、甜菜黄素和总甜菜素分别提高了54.4%、11%和36%。总酚含量(193.26 mg GAE/g)和抗氧化活性(53.23%)均显著提高,表明UAE具有较好的提取效果。扫描电镜分析证实,阿联酋处理过的渣土孔隙度增加,支持其高效利用。结论UAE法提取效果优于EAE法和CE法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
425
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal publishes new measurement results, characteristic properties, differentiating patterns, measurement methods and procedures for such purposes as food process innovation, product development, quality control, and safety assurance. The journal encompasses all topics related to food property measurement and characterization, including all types of measured properties of food and food materials, features and patterns, measurement principles and techniques, development and evaluation of technologies, novel uses and applications, and industrial implementation of systems and procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信