Advancing forest carbon projections requires improved convergence between ecological and economic models

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Madisen R. Fuller, Manaswini Ganjam, Justin S. Baker, Robert C. Abt
{"title":"Advancing forest carbon projections requires improved convergence between ecological and economic models","authors":"Madisen R. Fuller,&nbsp;Manaswini Ganjam,&nbsp;Justin S. Baker,&nbsp;Robert C. Abt","doi":"10.1186/s13021-024-00290-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forests have the potential to contribute significantly to global climate policy efforts through enhanced carbon sequestration and storage in terrestrial systems and wood products. Projections models simulate changes future in forest carbon fluxes under different environmental, economic, and policy conditions and can inform landowners and policymakers on how to best utilize global forests for mitigating climate change. However, forest carbon modeling frameworks are often developed and applied in a highly disciplinary manner, e.g., with ecological and economic modeling communities typically operating in silos or through soft model linkages through input–output parametric relationships. Recent disciplinary divides between economic and ecological research communities confound policy guidance on levers to increase forest carbon sinks and enhance ecosystem resilience to global change. This paper reviews and summarizes the expansive literature on forest carbon modeling within economic and ecological disciplines, discusses the benefits and limitations of commonly used models, and proposes a convergence approach to better integrating ecological and economic systems frameworks. More specifically, we highlight the critical feedback loops that exist when economic and ecological carbon models operate independently and discuss the benefits of a more integrated approach. We then describe an iterative approach that involves the sharing of methodology, perspectives, and data between the regimented model types. An integrated approach can reduce the limitations or disciplinary bias of forest carbon models by exploiting and merging their relative strengths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-024-00290-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-024-00290-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forests have the potential to contribute significantly to global climate policy efforts through enhanced carbon sequestration and storage in terrestrial systems and wood products. Projections models simulate changes future in forest carbon fluxes under different environmental, economic, and policy conditions and can inform landowners and policymakers on how to best utilize global forests for mitigating climate change. However, forest carbon modeling frameworks are often developed and applied in a highly disciplinary manner, e.g., with ecological and economic modeling communities typically operating in silos or through soft model linkages through input–output parametric relationships. Recent disciplinary divides between economic and ecological research communities confound policy guidance on levers to increase forest carbon sinks and enhance ecosystem resilience to global change. This paper reviews and summarizes the expansive literature on forest carbon modeling within economic and ecological disciplines, discusses the benefits and limitations of commonly used models, and proposes a convergence approach to better integrating ecological and economic systems frameworks. More specifically, we highlight the critical feedback loops that exist when economic and ecological carbon models operate independently and discuss the benefits of a more integrated approach. We then describe an iterative approach that involves the sharing of methodology, perspectives, and data between the regimented model types. An integrated approach can reduce the limitations or disciplinary bias of forest carbon models by exploiting and merging their relative strengths.

推进森林碳预测需要改善生态模型和经济模型之间的衔接
森林有可能通过加强陆地系统和木材产品的碳固存和储存,为全球气候政策努力作出重大贡献。预估模型模拟了不同环境、经济和政策条件下森林碳通量的未来变化,可以为土地所有者和决策者提供关于如何最好地利用全球森林减缓气候变化的信息。然而,森林碳模型框架往往以高度纪律的方式开发和应用,例如,生态和经济模型社区通常在筒仓中运作,或通过投入产出参数关系的软模型联系。最近经济研究界和生态研究界之间的学科分歧混淆了增加森林碳汇和增强生态系统对全球变化的适应能力的政策指导。本文回顾和总结了经济和生态学科中关于森林碳模型的大量文献,讨论了常用模型的优点和局限性,并提出了一种更好地整合生态和经济系统框架的收敛方法。更具体地说,我们强调了经济和生态碳模型独立运行时存在的关键反馈回路,并讨论了更综合方法的好处。然后,我们描述了一种迭代方法,该方法涉及在规范化模型类型之间共享方法、透视图和数据。综合方法可以通过利用和合并森林碳模型的相对优势来减少其局限性或学科偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信