Photometric Comparison of Metis and LASCO-C2 Polarized Brightness Images

IF 2.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Alberto M. Vásquez, Federico A. Nuevo, Aleksandr Burtovoi, Philippe Lamy, Marco Romoli, Hugo Gilardy, Richard A. Frazin, Nishtha Sachdeva, Ward B. Manchester IV, Lucia Abbo, Yara De Leo, Federica Frassati, Giovanna Jerse, Federico Landini, Giuliana Russano, Clementina Sasso, Roberto Susino, Michela Uslenghi
{"title":"Photometric Comparison of Metis and LASCO-C2 Polarized Brightness Images","authors":"Alberto M. Vásquez,&nbsp;Federico A. Nuevo,&nbsp;Aleksandr Burtovoi,&nbsp;Philippe Lamy,&nbsp;Marco Romoli,&nbsp;Hugo Gilardy,&nbsp;Richard A. Frazin,&nbsp;Nishtha Sachdeva,&nbsp;Ward B. Manchester IV,&nbsp;Lucia Abbo,&nbsp;Yara De Leo,&nbsp;Federica Frassati,&nbsp;Giovanna Jerse,&nbsp;Federico Landini,&nbsp;Giuliana Russano,&nbsp;Clementina Sasso,&nbsp;Roberto Susino,&nbsp;Michela Uslenghi","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02370-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Metis coronagraph onboard Solar Orbiter and the LASCO-C2 coronagraph onboard SoHO both acquire white light polarized brightness (pB) images of the solar corona. When the Sun–Solar Orbiter distance is less than 0.85 AU, i.e., outside orbital segments around aphelia, the range of elongations covered by the fields-of-view of the two instruments overlap significantly, allowing a quantitative comparison of their images. We report on such a comparison during September 2022, with images taken during a superior conjunction of the two spacecraft with the Sun, as well as close to that event. In each comparison, the two instruments observed the corona from opposite viewpoints, within <span>\\(\\approx 1^{\\circ }\\)</span> in both Carrington longitude and latitude, with Metis at a distance of about half an astronomical unit from the Sun. We find that the Metis measurements are systematically larger than those of LASCO-C2 throughout the corona, with the Metis-to-C2 ratio of pB exhibiting a median value of <span>\\(\\approx 1.6\\)</span>. The discrepancy is observed comparing essentially simultaneous observations, so it cannot be explained as an effect of coronal dynamics. Synthetic images of the solar corona computed from a stationary three-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamic model, replicating the geometry of the observations, are photometrically consistent. This rules out the small departure of the two instruments from observing from opposite viewpoints, or their different distance to the Sun, as the cause of their discrepant measurements. We conclude that the reported discrepancy has its root in the calibration methods of the two instruments, which should be further investigated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"300 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02370-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Metis coronagraph onboard Solar Orbiter and the LASCO-C2 coronagraph onboard SoHO both acquire white light polarized brightness (pB) images of the solar corona. When the Sun–Solar Orbiter distance is less than 0.85 AU, i.e., outside orbital segments around aphelia, the range of elongations covered by the fields-of-view of the two instruments overlap significantly, allowing a quantitative comparison of their images. We report on such a comparison during September 2022, with images taken during a superior conjunction of the two spacecraft with the Sun, as well as close to that event. In each comparison, the two instruments observed the corona from opposite viewpoints, within \(\approx 1^{\circ }\) in both Carrington longitude and latitude, with Metis at a distance of about half an astronomical unit from the Sun. We find that the Metis measurements are systematically larger than those of LASCO-C2 throughout the corona, with the Metis-to-C2 ratio of pB exhibiting a median value of \(\approx 1.6\). The discrepancy is observed comparing essentially simultaneous observations, so it cannot be explained as an effect of coronal dynamics. Synthetic images of the solar corona computed from a stationary three-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamic model, replicating the geometry of the observations, are photometrically consistent. This rules out the small departure of the two instruments from observing from opposite viewpoints, or their different distance to the Sun, as the cause of their discrepant measurements. We conclude that the reported discrepancy has its root in the calibration methods of the two instruments, which should be further investigated.

Metis和LASCO-C2偏振亮度图像的光度比较
太阳轨道飞行器上的Metis日冕仪和SoHO上的LASCO-C2日冕仪都获得了太阳日冕的白光偏振亮度(pB)图像。当太阳-太阳轨道器距离小于0.85天文单位时,即在非helia周围的轨道段外,两台仪器的视场所覆盖的延伸范围明显重叠,从而可以对它们的图像进行定量比较。我们将在2022年9月报告这样的比较,在两个航天器与太阳的优越连接期间以及接近该事件时拍摄的图像。在每次比较中,两种仪器从相反的角度观察日冕,在卡灵顿经度和纬度的\(\approx 1^{\circ }\)范围内,梅蒂斯距离太阳大约半个天文单位。我们发现,在整个日冕中,Metis的测量值系统地大于LASCO-C2的测量值,Metis与c2的pB比值的中值为\(\approx 1.6\)。这种差异是比较基本上同时观测到的,因此不能解释为日冕动力学的影响。从一个固定的三维磁流体动力学模型计算的日冕合成图像,复制了观测的几何形状,在光度上是一致的。这就排除了两种仪器从相反的角度观测的微小偏差,或者它们到太阳的距离不同,是导致它们测量结果不一致的原因。我们认为,报告的差异根源在于两种仪器的校准方法,这需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solar Physics
Solar Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
17.90%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Solar Physics was founded in 1967 and is the principal journal for the publication of the results of fundamental research on the Sun. The journal treats all aspects of solar physics, ranging from the internal structure of the Sun and its evolution to the outer corona and solar wind in interplanetary space. Papers on solar-terrestrial physics and on stellar research are also published when their results have a direct bearing on our understanding of the Sun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信