Psychometric analysis of the resonance concept inventory†

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Grace C. Tetschner and Sachin Nedungadi
{"title":"Psychometric analysis of the resonance concept inventory†","authors":"Grace C. Tetschner and Sachin Nedungadi","doi":"10.1039/D4RP00170B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Many undergraduate chemistry students hold alternate conceptions related to resonance—an important and fundamental topic of organic chemistry. To help address these alternate conceptions, an organic chemistry instructor could administer the resonance concept inventory (RCI), which is a multiple-choice assessment that was designed to identify resonance-related alternate conceptions held by organic chemistry students. In this study, two iterations of the RCI were administered to undergraduate organic chemistry students: the RCI-Pilot (<em>N</em> = 484) and the RCI-Final (<em>N</em> = 595). Evidence was collected to support the quality of the RCI items, the validity of the data obtained with the RCI based on internal structure, and the reliability of the data obtained with the RCI. Classical test theory (CTT) was utilized to determine the quality of the items. To gather validity evidence, the Rasch model was used and a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis was conducted. Reliability estimates were made using McDonald's Omega. Since validity and reliability evidence was gathered for the assessment scores, the data obtained in this study supports the use of the 14-item RCI for detecting student alternate conceptions with resonance.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 1","pages":" 231-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d4rp00170b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many undergraduate chemistry students hold alternate conceptions related to resonance—an important and fundamental topic of organic chemistry. To help address these alternate conceptions, an organic chemistry instructor could administer the resonance concept inventory (RCI), which is a multiple-choice assessment that was designed to identify resonance-related alternate conceptions held by organic chemistry students. In this study, two iterations of the RCI were administered to undergraduate organic chemistry students: the RCI-Pilot (N = 484) and the RCI-Final (N = 595). Evidence was collected to support the quality of the RCI items, the validity of the data obtained with the RCI based on internal structure, and the reliability of the data obtained with the RCI. Classical test theory (CTT) was utilized to determine the quality of the items. To gather validity evidence, the Rasch model was used and a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis was conducted. Reliability estimates were made using McDonald's Omega. Since validity and reliability evidence was gathered for the assessment scores, the data obtained in this study supports the use of the 14-item RCI for detecting student alternate conceptions with resonance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信