Unraveling the Atomistic Mechanism of Electrostatic Lateral Association of Peptide β‐Sheet Structures and Its Role in Nanofiber Growth and Hydrogelation
Mohamed A. N. Soliman, Abdulwahhab Khedr, Tarsem Sahota, Rachel Armitage, Raymond Allan, Katie Laird, Natalie Allcock, Fatmah I. Ghuloum, Mahetab H. Amer, Reem Alazragi, Charlotte J. C. Edwards‐Gayle, Jacek K. Wychowaniec, Attilio V. Vargiu, Mohamed A. Elsawy
{"title":"Unraveling the Atomistic Mechanism of Electrostatic Lateral Association of Peptide β‐Sheet Structures and Its Role in Nanofiber Growth and Hydrogelation","authors":"Mohamed A. N. Soliman, Abdulwahhab Khedr, Tarsem Sahota, Rachel Armitage, Raymond Allan, Katie Laird, Natalie Allcock, Fatmah I. Ghuloum, Mahetab H. Amer, Reem Alazragi, Charlotte J. C. Edwards‐Gayle, Jacek K. Wychowaniec, Attilio V. Vargiu, Mohamed A. Elsawy","doi":"10.1002/smll.202408213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guiding molecular assembly of peptides into rationally engineered nanostructures remains a major hurdle against the development of functional peptide‐based nanomaterials. Various non‐covalent interactions come into play to drive the formation and stabilization of these assemblies, of which electrostatic interactions are key. Here, the atomistic mechanisms by which electrostatic interactions contribute toward controlling self‐assembly and lateral association of ultrashort β‐sheet forming peptides are deciphered. Our results show that this is governed by charge distribution and ionic complementarity, both affecting the interaction patterns between charged residues: terminal, core, and/or terminal‐to‐core attraction/repulsion. Controlling electrostatic interactions enabled fine‐tuning nanofiber morphology for the 16 examined peptides, resulting into versatile nanostructures ranging from extended thin fibrils and thick bundles to twisted helical “braids” and short pseudocrystalline nanosheets. This in turn affected the physical appearance and viscoelasticity of the formed materials, varying from turbid colloidal dispersions and viscous solutions to soft and stiff self‐supportive hydrogels, as revealed from oscillatory rheology. Atomistic mechanisms of electrostatic interaction patterns were confirmed by molecular dynamic simulations, validating molecular and nanoscopic characterization of the developed materials. In essence, detailed mechanisms of electrostatic interactions emphasizing the impact of charge distribution and ionic complementarity on self‐assembly, nanostructure formation, and hydrogelation are reported.","PeriodicalId":228,"journal":{"name":"Small","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202408213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Guiding molecular assembly of peptides into rationally engineered nanostructures remains a major hurdle against the development of functional peptide‐based nanomaterials. Various non‐covalent interactions come into play to drive the formation and stabilization of these assemblies, of which electrostatic interactions are key. Here, the atomistic mechanisms by which electrostatic interactions contribute toward controlling self‐assembly and lateral association of ultrashort β‐sheet forming peptides are deciphered. Our results show that this is governed by charge distribution and ionic complementarity, both affecting the interaction patterns between charged residues: terminal, core, and/or terminal‐to‐core attraction/repulsion. Controlling electrostatic interactions enabled fine‐tuning nanofiber morphology for the 16 examined peptides, resulting into versatile nanostructures ranging from extended thin fibrils and thick bundles to twisted helical “braids” and short pseudocrystalline nanosheets. This in turn affected the physical appearance and viscoelasticity of the formed materials, varying from turbid colloidal dispersions and viscous solutions to soft and stiff self‐supportive hydrogels, as revealed from oscillatory rheology. Atomistic mechanisms of electrostatic interaction patterns were confirmed by molecular dynamic simulations, validating molecular and nanoscopic characterization of the developed materials. In essence, detailed mechanisms of electrostatic interactions emphasizing the impact of charge distribution and ionic complementarity on self‐assembly, nanostructure formation, and hydrogelation are reported.
期刊介绍:
Small serves as an exceptional platform for both experimental and theoretical studies in fundamental and applied interdisciplinary research at the nano- and microscale. The journal offers a compelling mix of peer-reviewed Research Articles, Reviews, Perspectives, and Comments.
With a remarkable 2022 Journal Impact Factor of 13.3 (Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics, 2023), Small remains among the top multidisciplinary journals, covering a wide range of topics at the interface of materials science, chemistry, physics, engineering, medicine, and biology.
Small's readership includes biochemists, biologists, biomedical scientists, chemists, engineers, information technologists, materials scientists, physicists, and theoreticians alike.